TSTP Solution File: LCL644+1.001 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : LCL644+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 09:29:13 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.55s 2.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    5 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    5 (   0 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p1(esk5_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lik70giq/input.p',i_0_7) ).

cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    p1(esk5_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lik70giq/input.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p1(esk5_0),
    i_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    p1(esk5_0),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : LCL644+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 22:03:05 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.55/2.42  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.55/2.42  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.55/2.42  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.55/2.42  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S010N
% 7.55/2.42  # and selection function SelectDiffNegLit.
% 7.55/2.42  #
% 7.55/2.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 7.55/2.42  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.55/2.42  
% 7.55/2.42  # Proof found!
% 7.55/2.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.55/2.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.55/2.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.55/2.42  
% 7.55/2.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.55/2.42  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 7.55/2.42  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 7.55/2.42  # Total time               : 0.021 s
% 7.55/2.42  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.55/2.42  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------