TSTP Solution File: LCL637+1.001 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LCL637+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:48:27 EDT 2023

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 3.63s 1.95s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : LCL637+1.001 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:23:56 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.63/1.95  
% 3.63/1.95  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.63/1.95  
% 3.63/1.95  Inference rules
% 3.63/1.95  ----------------------
% 3.63/1.95  #Ref     : 0
% 3.63/1.95  #Sup     : 24
% 3.63/1.95  #Fact    : 0
% 3.63/1.95  #Define  : 0
% 3.63/1.95  #Split   : 3
% 3.63/1.95  #Chain   : 0
% 3.63/1.95  #Close   : 0
% 3.63/1.95  
% 3.63/1.95  Ordering : KBO
% 3.63/1.95  
% 3.63/1.95  Simplification rules
% 3.63/1.95  ----------------------
% 3.63/1.95  #Subsume      : 19
% 3.63/1.95  #Demod        : 32
% 3.63/1.95  #Tautology    : 2
% 3.63/1.95  #SimpNegUnit  : 18
% 3.63/1.95  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.63/1.95  
% 3.63/1.95  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.63/1.95  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.63/1.95  
% 3.63/1.95  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.63/1.95  ----------------------
% 3.63/1.96  Preprocessing        : 0.51
% 3.63/1.96  Parsing              : 0.27
% 3.63/1.96  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 3.63/1.96  Main loop            : 0.34
% 3.63/1.96  Inferencing          : 0.12
% 3.63/1.96  Reduction            : 0.09
% 3.63/1.96  Demodulation         : 0.06
% 3.63/1.96  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.63/1.96  Subsumption          : 0.10
% 3.63/1.96  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.63/1.96  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.63/1.96  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.63/1.96  Total                : 0.87
% 3.63/1.96  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.63/1.96  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.63/1.96  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.63/1.96  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------