TSTP Solution File: LCL553+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : LCL553+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:11:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.43s 31.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 31
% Number of leaves : 24
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 133 ( 72 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 244 ( 37 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 193 ( 82 ~; 80 |; 16 &)
% ( 9 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 15 ( 13 usr; 13 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 25 ( 25 usr; 19 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 207 ( 15 sgn 50 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(op_strict_implies,axiom,
( op_strict_implies
=> ! [X1,X2] : strict_implies(X1,X2) = necessarily(implies(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+1.ax',op_strict_implies) ).
fof(adjunction,axiom,
( adjunction
<=> ! [X1,X2] :
( ( is_a_theorem(X1)
& is_a_theorem(X2) )
=> is_a_theorem(and(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',adjunction) ).
fof(op_strict_equiv,axiom,
( op_strict_equiv
=> ! [X1,X2] : strict_equiv(X1,X2) = and(strict_implies(X1,X2),strict_implies(X2,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+1.ax',op_strict_equiv) ).
fof(s1_0_op_strict_implies,axiom,
op_strict_implies,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_op_strict_implies) ).
fof(s1_0_adjunction,axiom,
adjunction,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_adjunction) ).
fof(s1_0_op_strict_equiv,axiom,
op_strict_equiv,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_op_strict_equiv) ).
fof(axiom_m1,axiom,
( axiom_m1
<=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X1,X2),and(X2,X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_m1) ).
fof(axiom_m4,axiom,
( axiom_m4
<=> ! [X1] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,and(X1,X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_m4) ).
fof(axiom_m2,axiom,
( axiom_m2
<=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X1,X2),X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_m2) ).
fof(substitution_strict_equiv,axiom,
( substitution_strict_equiv
<=> ! [X1,X2] :
( is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X1,X2))
=> X1 = X2 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',substitution_strict_equiv) ).
fof(s1_0_axiom_m1,axiom,
axiom_m1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_axiom_m1) ).
fof(axiom_m3,axiom,
( axiom_m3
<=> ! [X1,X2,X3] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(and(X1,X2),X3),and(X1,and(X2,X3)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_m3) ).
fof(s1_0_axiom_m4,axiom,
axiom_m4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_axiom_m4) ).
fof(s1_0_axiom_m2,axiom,
axiom_m2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_axiom_m2) ).
fof(s1_0_substitution_strict_equiv,axiom,
substitution_strict_equiv,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_substitution_strict_equiv) ).
fof(s1_0_axiom_m3,axiom,
axiom_m3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_axiom_m3) ).
fof(modus_ponens_strict_implies,axiom,
( modus_ponens_strict_implies
<=> ! [X1,X2] :
( ( is_a_theorem(X1)
& is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2)) )
=> is_a_theorem(X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',modus_ponens_strict_implies) ).
fof(s1_0_modus_ponens_strict_implies,axiom,
modus_ponens_strict_implies,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_modus_ponens_strict_implies) ).
fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
( op_implies_and
=> ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).
fof(axiom_m5,axiom,
( axiom_m5
<=> ! [X1,X2,X3] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(strict_implies(X1,X2),strict_implies(X2,X3)),strict_implies(X1,X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_m5) ).
fof(hilbert_op_implies_and,axiom,
op_implies_and,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).
fof(s1_0_axiom_m5,axiom,
axiom_m5,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+4.ax',s1_0_axiom_m5) ).
fof(hilbert_implies_2,conjecture,
implies_2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_implies_2) ).
fof(implies_2,axiom,
( implies_2
<=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)),implies(X1,X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_2) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ op_strict_implies
| strict_implies(X3,X4) = necessarily(implies(X3,X4)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_strict_implies])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ adjunction
| ~ is_a_theorem(X3)
| ~ is_a_theorem(X4)
| is_a_theorem(and(X3,X4)) )
& ( is_a_theorem(esk59_0)
| adjunction )
& ( is_a_theorem(esk60_0)
| adjunction )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(and(esk59_0,esk60_0))
| adjunction ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[adjunction])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_26,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ op_strict_equiv
| strict_equiv(X3,X4) = and(strict_implies(X3,X4),strict_implies(X4,X3)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_strict_equiv])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( strict_implies(X1,X2) = necessarily(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ op_strict_implies ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
op_strict_implies,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_op_strict_implies]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( is_a_theorem(and(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ adjunction ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
adjunction,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_adjunction]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( strict_equiv(X1,X2) = and(strict_implies(X1,X2),strict_implies(X2,X1))
| ~ op_strict_equiv ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
strict_implies(X1,X2) = necessarily(implies(X1,X2)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
op_strict_equiv,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_op_strict_equiv]) ).
fof(c_0_34,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ axiom_m1
| is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X3,X4),and(X4,X3))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(esk77_0,esk78_0),and(esk78_0,esk77_0)))
| axiom_m1 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_m1])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_35,plain,
! [X2] :
( ( ~ axiom_m4
| is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X2,and(X2,X2))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(esk84_0,and(esk84_0,esk84_0)))
| axiom_m4 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_m4])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_36,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ axiom_m2
| is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X3,X4),X3)) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(esk79_0,esk80_0),esk79_0))
| axiom_m2 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_m2])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_37,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ substitution_strict_equiv
| ~ is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X3,X4))
| X3 = X4 )
& ( is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(esk61_0,esk62_0))
| substitution_strict_equiv )
& ( esk61_0 != esk62_0
| substitution_strict_equiv ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[substitution_strict_equiv])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( is_a_theorem(and(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30])]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
and(necessarily(implies(X1,X2)),necessarily(implies(X2,X1))) = strict_equiv(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_32]),c_0_33])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X1,X2),and(X2,X1)))
| ~ axiom_m1 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
axiom_m1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_axiom_m1]) ).
fof(c_0_42,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ axiom_m3
| is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(and(X4,X5),X6),and(X4,and(X5,X6)))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(and(esk81_0,esk82_0),esk83_0),and(esk81_0,and(esk82_0,esk83_0))))
| axiom_m3 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_m3])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,and(X1,X1)))
| ~ axiom_m4 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
axiom_m4,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_axiom_m4]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X1,X2),X1))
| ~ axiom_m2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
axiom_m2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_axiom_m2]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X1,X2))
| ~ substitution_strict_equiv ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
substitution_strict_equiv,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_substitution_strict_equiv]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X2,X1)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,X2))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(and(X1,X2),and(X2,X1)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_32]),c_0_41])]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(and(X1,X2),X3),and(X1,and(X2,X3))))
| ~ axiom_m3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
axiom_m3,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_axiom_m3]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,and(X1,X1)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_32]),c_0_44])]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(and(X1,X2),X1))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_32]),c_0_46])]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X1,X2)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48])]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(and(X1,X2),and(X2,X1))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),c_0_50])]) ).
fof(c_0_57,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ modus_ponens_strict_implies
| ~ is_a_theorem(X3)
| ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X3,X4))
| is_a_theorem(X4) )
& ( is_a_theorem(esk57_0)
| modus_ponens_strict_implies )
& ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(esk57_0,esk58_0))
| modus_ponens_strict_implies )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(esk58_0)
| modus_ponens_strict_implies ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens_strict_implies])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(and(and(X1,X2),X3),and(X1,and(X2,X3))))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_32]),c_0_52])]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(and(X1,X1),X1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_53]),c_0_54])]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
and(X1,X2) = and(X2,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]) ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X2,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ modus_ponens_strict_implies ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_57]) ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
modus_ponens_strict_implies,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_modus_ponens_strict_implies]) ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(and(X1,and(X2,X3)),and(and(X1,X2),X3)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(and(X1,and(X2,X3)),and(and(X1,X2),X3)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_58]) ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
and(X1,X1) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_59]) ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(and(X1,X2),X2))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_60]) ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
strict_equiv(X1,X2) = strict_equiv(X2,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_60]),c_0_39]) ).
fof(c_0_67,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ op_implies_and
| implies(X3,X4) = not(and(X3,not(X4))) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_68,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X2,X1)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]),c_0_32])]) ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(and(X1,X2),and(X1,and(X1,X2)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]),c_0_65])]),c_0_66]) ).
fof(c_0_70,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ axiom_m5
| is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(strict_implies(X4,X5),strict_implies(X5,X6)),strict_implies(X4,X6))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(strict_implies(esk85_0,esk86_0),strict_implies(esk86_0,esk87_0)),strict_implies(esk85_0,esk87_0)))
| axiom_m5 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_m5])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
( implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2)))
| ~ op_implies_and ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_67]) ).
cnf(c_0_72,plain,
op_implies_and,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_implies_and]) ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
( is_a_theorem(and(X1,and(X2,X3)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(and(and(X1,X2),X3)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_58]) ).
cnf(c_0_74,plain,
and(X1,and(X1,X2)) = and(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_69]) ).
cnf(c_0_75,plain,
( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(strict_implies(X1,X2),strict_implies(X2,X3)),strict_implies(X1,X3)))
| ~ axiom_m5 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_70]) ).
cnf(c_0_76,plain,
axiom_m5,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_axiom_m5]) ).
cnf(c_0_77,plain,
not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_72])]) ).
cnf(c_0_78,plain,
( is_a_theorem(and(X1,and(X2,X3)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(and(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_79,plain,
and(necessarily(implies(X1,X2)),strict_equiv(X1,X2)) = strict_equiv(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_80,plain,
is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(and(necessarily(implies(X1,X2)),necessarily(implies(X2,X3))),necessarily(implies(X1,X3))))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_75,c_0_32]),c_0_32]),c_0_32]),c_0_32]),c_0_76])]) ).
cnf(c_0_81,plain,
not(and(not(X1),X2)) = implies(X2,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_60]) ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
( is_a_theorem(and(necessarily(implies(X1,X2)),and(strict_equiv(X1,X2),X3)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_79]) ).
cnf(c_0_83,plain,
strict_equiv(X1,X1) = necessarily(implies(X1,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_64]) ).
cnf(c_0_84,plain,
is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,X1))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_64]) ).
cnf(c_0_85,plain,
( is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(and(necessarily(implies(X1,X3)),necessarily(implies(X3,X2)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_80]) ).
cnf(c_0_86,plain,
implies(not(X1),X2) = implies(not(X2),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_81]) ).
cnf(c_0_87,plain,
( is_a_theorem(and(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(and(X2,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_50]) ).
cnf(c_0_88,plain,
( is_a_theorem(and(necessarily(implies(X1,X1)),X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_82,c_0_83]),c_0_74]),c_0_84])]) ).
cnf(c_0_89,plain,
( is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(and(necessarily(implies(X1,not(X3))),necessarily(implies(not(X2),X3)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_86]) ).
cnf(c_0_90,plain,
( is_a_theorem(and(X1,necessarily(implies(X2,X2))))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_88]) ).
cnf(c_0_91,plain,
( is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(not(X1),X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(and(necessarily(implies(not(X3),X1)),necessarily(implies(X3,X2)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_86]) ).
cnf(c_0_92,plain,
( is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,not(not(X2))))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_90]) ).
cnf(c_0_93,plain,
( is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(not(not(X1)),X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,X2))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_88]) ).
cnf(c_0_94,plain,
is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(and(not(not(X1)),X2),X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_92,c_0_54]) ).
cnf(c_0_95,plain,
( is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X1,not(X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(not(X1),X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,not(X2)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_86]) ).
cnf(c_0_96,plain,
is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(not(X1),implies(X2,not(X1))))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_94]),c_0_81]),c_0_86]) ).
cnf(c_0_97,plain,
implies(not(X1),X1) = not(not(X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_64]) ).
cnf(c_0_98,plain,
( is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X1,not(not(X1))))
| ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,not(not(X1))))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_84]) ).
cnf(c_0_99,plain,
is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(not(X1),not(not(not(X1)))))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_96,c_0_97]) ).
cnf(c_0_100,plain,
is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(not(X1),not(not(not(X1))))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_98,c_0_99]) ).
cnf(c_0_101,plain,
( is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X3,X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_102,plain,
not(not(not(X1))) = not(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_100]) ).
cnf(c_0_103,plain,
( is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,and(X2,X3)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_101,c_0_54]) ).
cnf(c_0_104,plain,
implies(X1,not(not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_102]),c_0_77]) ).
cnf(c_0_105,plain,
( is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(not(X1),X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(not(and(X2,X3)),X1))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_103,c_0_86]) ).
cnf(c_0_106,plain,
is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X1,not(not(X1)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_98,c_0_104]),c_0_84])]) ).
cnf(c_0_107,plain,
is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(not(X1),not(and(X1,X2))))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_105,c_0_84]),c_0_86]) ).
cnf(c_0_108,plain,
not(not(X1)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_106]) ).
fof(c_0_109,negated_conjecture,
~ implies_2,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hilbert_implies_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_110,plain,
is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(not(not(X1)),implies(X2,X1)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_81]) ).
cnf(c_0_111,plain,
and(X1,and(X2,X1)) = and(X2,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_60]) ).
cnf(c_0_112,plain,
not(and(X1,X2)) = implies(X1,not(X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_108]) ).
fof(c_0_113,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ implies_2
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,implies(X3,X4)),implies(X3,X4))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk9_0,implies(esk9_0,esk10_0)),implies(esk9_0,esk10_0)))
| implies_2 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_2])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_114,negated_conjecture,
~ implies_2,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_109]) ).
cnf(c_0_115,plain,
( is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3))))
| ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,not(not(X3))))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_101,c_0_110]) ).
cnf(c_0_116,plain,
implies(and(X1,not(X2)),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_111]),c_0_77]) ).
cnf(c_0_117,plain,
and(X1,X2) = not(implies(X1,not(X2))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_108,c_0_112]) ).
cnf(c_0_118,plain,
( implies_2
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk9_0,implies(esk9_0,esk10_0)),implies(esk9_0,esk10_0))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_113]) ).
cnf(c_0_119,negated_conjecture,
~ implies_2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_114]) ).
cnf(c_0_120,plain,
( is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3))))
| ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,X3))) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_104]) ).
cnf(c_0_121,plain,
implies(not(X1),X1) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_97,c_0_108]) ).
cnf(c_0_122,plain,
implies(not(X1),implies(X2,X1)) = implies(X2,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_116,c_0_117]),c_0_108]),c_0_86]) ).
cnf(c_0_123,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk9_0,implies(esk9_0,esk10_0)),implies(esk9_0,esk10_0))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_118,c_0_119]) ).
cnf(c_0_124,plain,
implies(not(X1),not(X2)) = implies(X2,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_112]) ).
cnf(c_0_125,plain,
( is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(X2)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_120,c_0_121]),c_0_122]) ).
cnf(c_0_126,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(esk9_0,esk10_0)),not(implies(esk9_0,implies(esk9_0,esk10_0))))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_123,c_0_124]) ).
cnf(c_0_127,plain,
implies(X1,implies(X1,X2)) = implies(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_122,c_0_124]),c_0_108]) ).
cnf(c_0_128,plain,
is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(X1,implies(X2,X2)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_125,c_0_84]) ).
cnf(c_0_129,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk9_0,esk10_0),implies(esk9_0,esk10_0))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_126,c_0_127]),c_0_124]) ).
cnf(c_0_130,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_128]) ).
cnf(c_0_131,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_129,c_0_130]) ).
cnf(c_0_132,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_84,c_0_131]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : LCL553+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 18:47:47 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.38/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.38/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.38/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.38/23.48 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.43/31.61 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 0.43/31.61 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.43/31.61 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.43/31.61
% 0.43/31.61 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.43/31.61 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.43/31.61 # Parsed axioms : 77
% 0.43/31.61 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 75
% 0.43/31.61 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.43/31.61 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.43/31.61 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.43/31.61 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.43/31.61 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.43/31.61 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.43/31.61 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.43/31.61 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.43/31.61 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Termbank termtop insertions : 808
% 0.43/31.61
% 0.43/31.61 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.43/31.61 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.43/31.61 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.43/31.61 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.43/31.61 # Maximum resident set size: 2848 pages
% 0.43/31.61 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_230b6c199cce1dcf6700db59e75a93feb83d1bd9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.43/31.61 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,01,20000,1.0)
% 0.43/31.61 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.43/31.61
% 0.43/31.61 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.43/31.61 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.43/31.61 # Parsed axioms : 77
% 0.43/31.61 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 75
% 0.43/31.61 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.43/31.61 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.43/31.61 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.43/31.61 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.43/31.61 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.43/31.61 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.43/31.61 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.43/31.61 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.43/31.61 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.43/31.61 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.43/31.61 # Termbank termtop insertions : 808
% 0.43/31.61
% 0.43/31.61 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.43/31.61 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.43/31.61 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.43/31.62 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.43/31.62 # Maximum resident set size: 2852 pages
% 0.43/31.62 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_48e494e00e0717ec2eabf59b73b2d711334607de for 23 seconds:
% 0.43/31.62 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,03,20000,1.0)
% 0.43/31.62 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.43/31.62
% 0.43/31.62 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.43/31.62 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.43/31.62 # Parsed axioms : 77
% 0.43/31.62 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 75
% 0.43/31.62 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.43/31.62 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.43/31.62 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.43/31.62 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.43/31.62 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.43/31.62 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.43/31.62 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.43/31.62 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.43/31.62 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Termbank termtop insertions : 808
% 0.43/31.62
% 0.43/31.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.43/31.62 # User time : 0.016 s
% 0.43/31.62 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.43/31.62 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.43/31.62 # Maximum resident set size: 2968 pages
% 0.43/31.62 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_33aa8a325940064c53b389b41203bb48a5cb5006 for 23 seconds:
% 0.43/31.62
% 0.43/31.62 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.43/31.62 # OLD status Res
% 0.43/31.62 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 0.43/31.62 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_260890dcdd2d907655d788d68835201aeffdef4a for 23 seconds:
% 0.43/31.62 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.5,,03,100,1.0)
% 0.43/31.62 # Preprocessing time : 0.008 s
% 0.43/31.62
% 0.43/31.62 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.43/31.62 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.43/31.62 # Parsed axioms : 77
% 0.43/31.62 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 75
% 0.43/31.62 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.43/31.62 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.43/31.62 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.43/31.62 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.43/31.62 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.43/31.62 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.43/31.62 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.43/31.62 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.43/31.62 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Termbank termtop insertions : 808
% 0.43/31.62
% 0.43/31.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.43/31.62 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.43/31.62 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.43/31.62 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.43/31.62 # Maximum resident set size: 2848 pages
% 0.43/31.62 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_9a428cb4e1feff5dec19b8494e78e7f0e8ede446 for 23 seconds:
% 0.43/31.62 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 0.43/31.62
% 0.43/31.62 # Proof found!
% 0.43/31.62 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.43/31.62 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.43/31.62 # Proof object total steps : 133
% 0.43/31.62 # Proof object clause steps : 95
% 0.43/31.62 # Proof object formula steps : 38
% 0.43/31.62 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.43/31.62 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.43/31.62 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.43/31.62 # Proof object initial clauses used : 24
% 0.43/31.62 # Proof object initial formulas used : 24
% 0.43/31.62 # Proof object generating inferences : 50
% 0.43/31.62 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 66
% 0.43/31.62 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.43/31.62 # Parsed axioms : 77
% 0.43/31.62 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Initial clauses : 135
% 0.43/31.62 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Initial clauses in saturation : 135
% 0.43/31.62 # Processed clauses : 9365
% 0.43/31.62 # ...of these trivial : 839
% 0.43/31.62 # ...subsumed : 6111
% 0.43/31.62 # ...remaining for further processing : 2415
% 0.43/31.62 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 144033
% 0.43/31.62 # Backward-subsumed : 120
% 0.43/31.62 # Backward-rewritten : 1280
% 0.43/31.62 # Generated clauses : 439026
% 0.43/31.62 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 400934
% 0.43/31.62 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Paramodulations : 438842
% 0.43/31.62 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Current number of processed clauses : 831
% 0.43/31.62 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 43
% 0.43/31.62 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 13
% 0.43/31.62 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.43/31.62 # Non-unit-clauses : 769
% 0.43/31.62 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 52035
% 0.43/31.62 # ...number of literals in the above : 167844
% 0.43/31.62 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Current number of archived clauses : 1584
% 0.43/31.62 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 188257
% 0.43/31.62 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 168365
% 0.43/31.62 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5979
% 0.43/31.62 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7084
% 0.43/31.62 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # BW rewrite match attempts : 109376
% 0.43/31.62 # BW rewrite match successes : 2262
% 0.43/31.62 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.43/31.62 # Termbank termtop insertions : 13471118
% 0.43/31.62
% 0.43/31.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.43/31.62 # User time : 7.014 s
% 0.43/31.62 # System time : 0.122 s
% 0.43/31.62 # Total time : 7.136 s
% 0.43/31.62 # Maximum resident set size: 163136 pages
% 0.43/46.46 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.43/46.47 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.43/46.48 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.43/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.43/46.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.43/46.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.43/46.52 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------