TSTP Solution File: LCL542+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : LCL542+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:48:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.50s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   49 (  20 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   77 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   59 (  28   ~;  19   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    4 (   0 usr;   3 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   3   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (  38   !;   6   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_62,type,
    sQ3_eqProxy: ( $int * $int ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_63,type,
    sQ4_eqProxy: ( $rat * $rat ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_64,type,
    sQ5_eqProxy: ( $real * $real ) > $o ).

fof(f375,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f374,f347]) ).

fof(f347,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X0),X1)),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f280,f299]) ).

fof(f299,plain,
    and_1,
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f199]) ).

fof(f199,plain,
    and_1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f40,axiom,
    and_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_and_1) ).

fof(f280,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X0),X1))
      | ~ and_1 ),
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f235]) ).

fof(f235,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X0),X1))
      | ~ and_1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f155]) ).

fof(f155,plain,
    ( ~ and_1
    | ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X0),X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f140]) ).

fof(f140,plain,
    ( and_1
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X0),X1)) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f111]) ).

fof(f111,plain,
    ( and_1
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X0),X1)) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ( and_1
  <=> ! [X1,X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_1) ).

fof(f374,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(sK1,sK0),sK1)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f372,f343]) ).

fof(f343,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f257,f269]) ).

fof(f269,plain,
    necessitation,
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f215]) ).

fof(f215,plain,
    necessitation,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f78,axiom,
    necessitation,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',km4b_necessitation) ).

fof(f257,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ necessitation
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ),
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f245]) ).

fof(f245,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ necessitation
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
      | is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f172]) ).

fof(f172,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) )
    | ~ necessitation ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f131]) ).

fof(f131,plain,
    ( necessitation
   => ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X0)
       => is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f50]) ).

fof(f50,axiom,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X0)
       => is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) )
  <=> necessitation ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',necessitation) ).

fof(f372,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(implies(and(sK1,sK0),sK1))),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f346,f370]) ).

fof(f370,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f289,f291]) ).

fof(f291,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f212]) ).

fof(f212,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f86]) ).

fof(f86,axiom,
    op_strict_implies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_strict_implies) ).

fof(f289,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ op_strict_implies
      | strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f223]) ).

fof(f223,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ op_strict_implies
      | strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f182]) ).

fof(f182,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1))
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f156]) ).

fof(f156,plain,
    ( ! [X1,X0] : strict_implies(X1,X0) = necessarily(implies(X1,X0))
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f96,plain,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [X1,X0] : strict_implies(X1,X0) = necessarily(implies(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f75]) ).

fof(f75,axiom,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [X1,X0] : strict_implies(X0,X1) = necessarily(implies(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_strict_implies) ).

fof(f346,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK1,sK0),sK1)),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f275,f259]) ).

fof(f259,plain,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f203]) ).

fof(f203,plain,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(flattening,[],[f90]) ).

fof(f90,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f89]) ).

fof(f89,conjecture,
    axiom_m2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_axiom_m2) ).

fof(f275,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK1,sK0),sK1))
    | axiom_m2 ),
    inference(literal_reordering,[],[f227]) ).

fof(f227,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK1,sK0),sK1))
    | axiom_m2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f188]) ).

fof(f188,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK1,sK0),sK1))
    | axiom_m2 ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f186,f187]) ).

fof(f187,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] : ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X1,X0),X1))
   => ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(sK1,sK0),sK1)) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f186,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] : ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X1,X0),X1))
    | axiom_m2 ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f169]) ).

fof(f169,plain,
    ( ? [X1,X0] : ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X0,X1),X0))
    | axiom_m2 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

fof(f126,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X0,X1),X0))
   => axiom_m2 ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f64]) ).

fof(f64,axiom,
    ( axiom_m2
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X0,X1),X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_m2) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : LCL542+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 02:04:05 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.46  % (31134)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.20/0.48  % (31134)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.49  % (31147)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (31134)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.50  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.50  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50  % (31134)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  % (31134)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.50  % (31134)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.50  % (31134)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  % (31134)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.20/0.50  % (31134)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.50  % (31134)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.20/0.50  % (31134)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  % (31134)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  % (31118)Success in time 0.139 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------