TSTP Solution File: LCL542+1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : LCL542+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:54:34 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :  171
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  191 (  14 unt; 163 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   53 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   44 (  19   ~;  16   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   16 (  10   >;   6   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   62 (  60 usr;  60 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :  103 ( 103 usr;  94 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   2 sgn;  14   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    modus_ponens: $o ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    substitution_of_equivalents: $o ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    equiv: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    modus_tollens: $o ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    implies_1: $o ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    implies_2: $o ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    implies_3: $o ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    and_1: $o ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    and: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    and_2: $o ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    and_3: $o ).

tff(decl_36,type,
    or_1: $o ).

tff(decl_37,type,
    or: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_38,type,
    or_2: $o ).

tff(decl_39,type,
    or_3: $o ).

tff(decl_40,type,
    equivalence_1: $o ).

tff(decl_41,type,
    equivalence_2: $o ).

tff(decl_42,type,
    equivalence_3: $o ).

tff(decl_43,type,
    kn1: $o ).

tff(decl_44,type,
    kn2: $o ).

tff(decl_45,type,
    kn3: $o ).

tff(decl_46,type,
    cn1: $o ).

tff(decl_47,type,
    cn2: $o ).

tff(decl_48,type,
    cn3: $o ).

tff(decl_49,type,
    r1: $o ).

tff(decl_50,type,
    r2: $o ).

tff(decl_51,type,
    r3: $o ).

tff(decl_52,type,
    r4: $o ).

tff(decl_53,type,
    r5: $o ).

tff(decl_54,type,
    op_or: $o ).

tff(decl_55,type,
    op_and: $o ).

tff(decl_56,type,
    op_implies_and: $o ).

tff(decl_57,type,
    op_implies_or: $o ).

tff(decl_58,type,
    op_equiv: $o ).

tff(decl_59,type,
    necessitation: $o ).

tff(decl_60,type,
    necessarily: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_61,type,
    modus_ponens_strict_implies: $o ).

tff(decl_62,type,
    strict_implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_63,type,
    adjunction: $o ).

tff(decl_64,type,
    substitution_strict_equiv: $o ).

tff(decl_65,type,
    strict_equiv: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_66,type,
    axiom_K: $o ).

tff(decl_67,type,
    axiom_M: $o ).

tff(decl_68,type,
    axiom_4: $o ).

tff(decl_69,type,
    axiom_B: $o ).

tff(decl_70,type,
    possibly: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_71,type,
    axiom_5: $o ).

tff(decl_72,type,
    axiom_s1: $o ).

tff(decl_73,type,
    axiom_s2: $o ).

tff(decl_74,type,
    axiom_s3: $o ).

tff(decl_75,type,
    axiom_s4: $o ).

tff(decl_76,type,
    axiom_m1: $o ).

tff(decl_77,type,
    axiom_m2: $o ).

tff(decl_78,type,
    axiom_m3: $o ).

tff(decl_79,type,
    axiom_m4: $o ).

tff(decl_80,type,
    axiom_m5: $o ).

tff(decl_81,type,
    axiom_m6: $o ).

tff(decl_82,type,
    axiom_m7: $o ).

tff(decl_83,type,
    axiom_m8: $o ).

tff(decl_84,type,
    axiom_m9: $o ).

tff(decl_85,type,
    axiom_m10: $o ).

tff(decl_86,type,
    op_possibly: $o ).

tff(decl_87,type,
    op_necessarily: $o ).

tff(decl_88,type,
    op_strict_implies: $o ).

tff(decl_89,type,
    op_strict_equiv: $o ).

tff(decl_90,type,
    op_implies: $o ).

tff(decl_91,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

tff(decl_92,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

tff(decl_93,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

tff(decl_94,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

tff(decl_95,type,
    esk5_0: $i ).

tff(decl_96,type,
    esk6_0: $i ).

tff(decl_97,type,
    esk7_0: $i ).

tff(decl_98,type,
    esk8_0: $i ).

tff(decl_99,type,
    esk9_0: $i ).

tff(decl_100,type,
    esk10_0: $i ).

tff(decl_101,type,
    esk11_0: $i ).

tff(decl_102,type,
    esk12_0: $i ).

tff(decl_103,type,
    esk13_0: $i ).

tff(decl_104,type,
    esk14_0: $i ).

tff(decl_105,type,
    esk15_0: $i ).

tff(decl_106,type,
    esk16_0: $i ).

tff(decl_107,type,
    esk17_0: $i ).

tff(decl_108,type,
    esk18_0: $i ).

tff(decl_109,type,
    esk19_0: $i ).

tff(decl_110,type,
    esk20_0: $i ).

tff(decl_111,type,
    esk21_0: $i ).

tff(decl_112,type,
    esk22_0: $i ).

tff(decl_113,type,
    esk23_0: $i ).

tff(decl_114,type,
    esk24_0: $i ).

tff(decl_115,type,
    esk25_0: $i ).

tff(decl_116,type,
    esk26_0: $i ).

tff(decl_117,type,
    esk27_0: $i ).

tff(decl_118,type,
    esk28_0: $i ).

tff(decl_119,type,
    esk29_0: $i ).

tff(decl_120,type,
    esk30_0: $i ).

tff(decl_121,type,
    esk31_0: $i ).

tff(decl_122,type,
    esk32_0: $i ).

tff(decl_123,type,
    esk33_0: $i ).

tff(decl_124,type,
    esk34_0: $i ).

tff(decl_125,type,
    esk35_0: $i ).

tff(decl_126,type,
    esk36_0: $i ).

tff(decl_127,type,
    esk37_0: $i ).

tff(decl_128,type,
    esk38_0: $i ).

tff(decl_129,type,
    esk39_0: $i ).

tff(decl_130,type,
    esk40_0: $i ).

tff(decl_131,type,
    esk41_0: $i ).

tff(decl_132,type,
    esk42_0: $i ).

tff(decl_133,type,
    esk43_0: $i ).

tff(decl_134,type,
    esk44_0: $i ).

tff(decl_135,type,
    esk45_0: $i ).

tff(decl_136,type,
    esk46_0: $i ).

tff(decl_137,type,
    esk47_0: $i ).

tff(decl_138,type,
    esk48_0: $i ).

tff(decl_139,type,
    esk49_0: $i ).

tff(decl_140,type,
    esk50_0: $i ).

tff(decl_141,type,
    esk51_0: $i ).

tff(decl_142,type,
    esk52_0: $i ).

tff(decl_143,type,
    esk53_0: $i ).

tff(decl_144,type,
    esk54_0: $i ).

tff(decl_145,type,
    esk55_0: $i ).

tff(decl_146,type,
    esk56_0: $i ).

tff(decl_147,type,
    esk57_0: $i ).

tff(decl_148,type,
    esk58_0: $i ).

tff(decl_149,type,
    esk59_0: $i ).

tff(decl_150,type,
    esk60_0: $i ).

tff(decl_151,type,
    esk61_0: $i ).

tff(decl_152,type,
    esk62_0: $i ).

tff(decl_153,type,
    esk63_0: $i ).

tff(decl_154,type,
    esk64_0: $i ).

tff(decl_155,type,
    esk65_0: $i ).

tff(decl_156,type,
    esk66_0: $i ).

tff(decl_157,type,
    esk67_0: $i ).

tff(decl_158,type,
    esk68_0: $i ).

tff(decl_159,type,
    esk69_0: $i ).

tff(decl_160,type,
    esk70_0: $i ).

tff(decl_161,type,
    esk71_0: $i ).

tff(decl_162,type,
    esk72_0: $i ).

tff(decl_163,type,
    esk73_0: $i ).

tff(decl_164,type,
    esk74_0: $i ).

tff(decl_165,type,
    esk75_0: $i ).

tff(decl_166,type,
    esk76_0: $i ).

tff(decl_167,type,
    esk77_0: $i ).

tff(decl_168,type,
    esk78_0: $i ).

tff(decl_169,type,
    esk79_0: $i ).

tff(decl_170,type,
    esk80_0: $i ).

tff(decl_171,type,
    esk81_0: $i ).

tff(decl_172,type,
    esk82_0: $i ).

tff(decl_173,type,
    esk83_0: $i ).

tff(decl_174,type,
    esk84_0: $i ).

tff(decl_175,type,
    esk85_0: $i ).

tff(decl_176,type,
    esk86_0: $i ).

tff(decl_177,type,
    esk87_0: $i ).

tff(decl_178,type,
    esk88_0: $i ).

tff(decl_179,type,
    esk89_0: $i ).

tff(decl_180,type,
    esk90_0: $i ).

tff(decl_181,type,
    esk91_0: $i ).

tff(decl_182,type,
    esk92_0: $i ).

tff(decl_183,type,
    esk93_0: $i ).

tff(decl_184,type,
    esk94_0: $i ).

fof(necessitation,axiom,
    ( necessitation
  <=> ! [X1] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X1)
       => is_a_theorem(necessarily(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',necessitation) ).

fof(op_strict_implies,axiom,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [X1,X2] : strict_implies(X1,X2) = necessarily(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+1.ax',op_strict_implies) ).

fof(axiom_m2,axiom,
    ( axiom_m2
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X1,X2),X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_m2) ).

fof(s1_0_axiom_m2,conjecture,
    axiom_m2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_axiom_m2) ).

fof(km4b_necessitation,axiom,
    necessitation,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+3.ax',km4b_necessitation) ).

fof(s1_0_op_strict_implies,axiom,
    op_strict_implies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_strict_implies) ).

fof(and_1,axiom,
    ( and_1
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',and_1) ).

fof(hilbert_and_1,axiom,
    and_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_and_1) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X127] :
      ( ( ~ necessitation
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X127)
        | is_a_theorem(necessarily(X127)) )
      & ( is_a_theorem(esk56_0)
        | necessitation )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(esk56_0))
        | necessitation ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[necessitation])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X207,X208] :
      ( ~ op_strict_implies
      | strict_implies(X207,X208) = necessarily(implies(X207,X208)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_strict_implies])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X173,X174] :
      ( ( ~ axiom_m2
        | is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X173,X174),X173)) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(esk79_0,esk80_0),esk79_0))
        | axiom_m2 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_m2])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[s1_0_axiom_m2])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X1))
    | ~ necessitation
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    necessitation,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[km4b_necessitation]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( strict_implies(X1,X2) = necessarily(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[s1_0_op_strict_implies]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( axiom_m2
    | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(esk79_0,esk80_0),esk79_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ axiom_m2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(necessarily(X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    necessarily(implies(X1,X2)) = strict_implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X33,X34] :
      ( ( ~ and_1
        | is_a_theorem(implies(and(X33,X34),X33)) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(esk14_0,esk15_0),esk14_0))
        | and_1 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[and_1])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(esk79_0,esk80_0),esk79_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1))
    | ~ and_1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    and_1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_and_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(esk79_0,esk80_0),esk79_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : LCL542+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.09/0.29  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % DateTime   : Thu Aug 24 17:52:42 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.48  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.50  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.14/0.50  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.50  % Proof found
% 0.14/0.50  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.50  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.50  % Total time : 0.014000 s
% 0.14/0.50  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.14/0.50  % Total time : 0.017000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------