TSTP Solution File: LCL539+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LCL539+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.elotlRiky2 true

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:00:07 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.82s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   39
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   97 (  39 unt;  19 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  131 (  20 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  359 (  42   ~;  39   |;   1   &; 264   @)
%                                         (   7 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (  12   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   21 (  19 usr;  13 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   84 (   0   ^;  84   !;   0   ?;  84   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__60_type,type,
    sk__60: $i ).

thf(axiom_M_type,type,
    axiom_M: $o ).

thf(and_type,type,
    and: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(is_a_theorem_type,type,
    is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).

thf(necessarily_type,type,
    necessarily: $i > $i ).

thf(op_equiv_type,type,
    op_equiv: $o ).

thf(strict_implies_type,type,
    strict_implies: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(op_strict_implies_type,type,
    op_strict_implies: $o ).

thf(and_1_type,type,
    and_1: $o ).

thf(equiv_type,type,
    equiv: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(and_3_type,type,
    and_3: $o ).

thf(and_2_type,type,
    and_2: $o ).

thf(modus_ponens_type,type,
    modus_ponens: $o ).

thf(substitution_strict_equiv_type,type,
    substitution_strict_equiv: $o ).

thf(op_strict_equiv_type,type,
    op_strict_equiv: $o ).

thf(implies_type,type,
    implies: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(substitution_of_equivalents_type,type,
    substitution_of_equivalents: $o ).

thf(sk__61_type,type,
    sk__61: $i ).

thf(strict_equiv_type,type,
    strict_equiv: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(substitution_strict_equiv,axiom,
    ( substitution_strict_equiv
  <=> ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem @ ( strict_equiv @ X @ Y ) )
       => ( X = Y ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl91,plain,
    ( substitution_strict_equiv
    | ( is_a_theorem @ ( strict_equiv @ sk__60 @ sk__61 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[substitution_strict_equiv]) ).

thf(s1_0_substitution_strict_equiv,conjecture,
    substitution_strict_equiv ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ substitution_strict_equiv,
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[s1_0_substitution_strict_equiv]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl146,plain,
    ~ substitution_strict_equiv,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl720,plain,
    is_a_theorem @ ( strict_equiv @ sk__60 @ sk__61 ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl91,zip_derived_cl146]) ).

thf(s1_0_op_strict_equiv,axiom,
    op_strict_equiv ).

thf(zip_derived_cl145,plain,
    op_strict_equiv,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[s1_0_op_strict_equiv]) ).

thf(op_strict_equiv,axiom,
    ( op_strict_equiv
   => ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
        ( ( strict_equiv @ X @ Y )
        = ( and @ ( strict_implies @ X @ Y ) @ ( strict_implies @ Y @ X ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl133,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( strict_equiv @ X0 @ X1 )
        = ( and @ ( strict_implies @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( strict_implies @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
      | ~ op_strict_equiv ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[op_strict_equiv]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl659,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( strict_equiv @ X1 @ X0 )
      = ( and @ ( strict_implies @ X1 @ X0 ) @ ( strict_implies @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl145,zip_derived_cl133]) ).

thf(hilbert_and_1,axiom,
    and_1 ).

thf(zip_derived_cl68,plain,
    and_1,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[hilbert_and_1]) ).

thf(and_1,axiom,
    ( and_1
  <=> ! [X: $i,Y: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( and @ X @ Y ) @ X ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl15,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( and @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X0 ) )
      | ~ and_1 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[and_1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl695,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( and @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X0 ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl68,zip_derived_cl15]) ).

thf(hilbert_modus_ponens,axiom,
    modus_ponens ).

thf(zip_derived_cl63,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[hilbert_modus_ponens]) ).

thf(modus_ponens,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
        ( ( ( is_a_theorem @ X )
          & ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) )
       => ( is_a_theorem @ Y ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( is_a_theorem @ X0 )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X1 )
      | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[modus_ponens]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl718,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X1 )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ X0 ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl63,zip_derived_cl0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl761,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( and @ X0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ X0 ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl695,zip_derived_cl718]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl765,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( strict_equiv @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ ( strict_implies @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl659,zip_derived_cl761]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl771,plain,
    is_a_theorem @ ( strict_implies @ sk__60 @ sk__61 ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl720,zip_derived_cl765]) ).

thf(s1_0_op_strict_implies,axiom,
    op_strict_implies ).

thf(zip_derived_cl143,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[s1_0_op_strict_implies]) ).

thf(op_strict_implies,axiom,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
        ( ( strict_implies @ X @ Y )
        = ( necessarily @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl132,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( strict_implies @ X0 @ X1 )
        = ( necessarily @ ( implies @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[op_strict_implies]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl658,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( strict_implies @ X1 @ X0 )
      = ( necessarily @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl143,zip_derived_cl132]) ).

thf(km4b_axiom_M,axiom,
    axiom_M ).

thf(zip_derived_cl137,plain,
    axiom_M,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[km4b_axiom_M]) ).

thf(axiom_M,axiom,
    ( axiom_M
  <=> ! [X: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( necessarily @ X ) @ X ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl94,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( necessarily @ X0 ) @ X0 ) )
      | ~ axiom_M ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[axiom_M]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl689,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( necessarily @ X0 ) @ X0 ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl137,zip_derived_cl94]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl718_001,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X1 )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ X0 ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl63,zip_derived_cl0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl735,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( necessarily @ X0 ) )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ X0 ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl689,zip_derived_cl718]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl737,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( strict_implies @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl658,zip_derived_cl735]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl772,plain,
    is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ sk__60 @ sk__61 ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl771,zip_derived_cl737]) ).

thf(hilbert_and_3,axiom,
    and_3 ).

thf(zip_derived_cl70,plain,
    and_3,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[hilbert_and_3]) ).

thf(and_3,axiom,
    ( and_3
  <=> ! [X: $i,Y: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ Y @ ( and @ X @ Y ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl19,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X0 @ ( implies @ X1 @ ( and @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) )
      | ~ and_3 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[and_3]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl697,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ ( implies @ X0 @ ( and @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl70,zip_derived_cl19]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl718_002,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X1 )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ X0 ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl63,zip_derived_cl0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl815,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X1 )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X0 @ ( and @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl697,zip_derived_cl718]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl718_003,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X1 )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ X0 ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl63,zip_derived_cl0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl842,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X1 )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X0 )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ ( and @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl815,zip_derived_cl718]) ).

thf(hilbert_op_equiv,axiom,
    op_equiv ).

thf(zip_derived_cl62,plain,
    op_equiv,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[hilbert_op_equiv]) ).

thf(op_equiv,axiom,
    ( op_equiv
   => ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
        ( ( equiv @ X @ Y )
        = ( and @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( equiv @ X0 @ X1 )
        = ( and @ ( implies @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
      | ~ op_equiv ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[op_equiv]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl688,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( equiv @ X1 @ X0 )
      = ( and @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) @ ( implies @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl62,zip_derived_cl59]) ).

thf(substitution_of_equivalents,axiom,
    substitution_of_equivalents ).

thf(zip_derived_cl77,plain,
    substitution_of_equivalents,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[substitution_of_equivalents]) ).

thf(substitution_of_equivalents_004,axiom,
    ( substitution_of_equivalents
  <=> ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem @ ( equiv @ X @ Y ) )
       => ( X = Y ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( equiv @ X0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ substitution_of_equivalents ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[substitution_of_equivalents]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl707,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X0 )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( equiv @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl77,zip_derived_cl4]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl745,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( and @ ( implies @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl688,zip_derived_cl707]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl852,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl842,zip_derived_cl745]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl873,plain,
    ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ sk__61 @ sk__60 ) )
    | ( sk__61 = sk__60 ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl772,zip_derived_cl852]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl720_005,plain,
    is_a_theorem @ ( strict_equiv @ sk__60 @ sk__61 ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl91,zip_derived_cl146]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl659_006,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( strict_equiv @ X1 @ X0 )
      = ( and @ ( strict_implies @ X1 @ X0 ) @ ( strict_implies @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl145,zip_derived_cl133]) ).

thf(hilbert_and_2,axiom,
    and_2 ).

thf(zip_derived_cl69,plain,
    and_2,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[hilbert_and_2]) ).

thf(and_2,axiom,
    ( and_2
  <=> ! [X: $i,Y: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( and @ X @ Y ) @ Y ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl17,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( and @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X1 ) )
      | ~ and_2 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[and_2]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl696,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( and @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X0 ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl69,zip_derived_cl17]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl718_007,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X1 )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ X0 ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl63,zip_derived_cl0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl778,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( and @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ X0 ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl696,zip_derived_cl718]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl782,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( strict_equiv @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ ( strict_implies @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl659,zip_derived_cl778]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl784,plain,
    is_a_theorem @ ( strict_implies @ sk__61 @ sk__60 ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl720,zip_derived_cl782]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl737_008,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( strict_implies @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl658,zip_derived_cl735]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl786,plain,
    is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ sk__61 @ sk__60 ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl784,zip_derived_cl737]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl878,plain,
    sk__61 = sk__60,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl873,zip_derived_cl786]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl90,plain,
    ( substitution_strict_equiv
    | ( sk__60 != sk__61 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[substitution_strict_equiv]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl146_009,plain,
    ~ substitution_strict_equiv,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl719,plain,
    sk__60 != sk__61,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl90,zip_derived_cl146]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl879,plain,
    $false,
    inference('simplify_reflect-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl878,zip_derived_cl719]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : LCL539+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.elotlRiky2 true
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 03:33:06 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.63  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.63  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.63  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.20/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo17_bce.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo8.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.82  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.20/0.82  % BCE start: 147
% 0.20/0.82  % BCE eliminated: 4
% 0.20/0.82  % PE start: 143
% 0.20/0.82  logic: eq
% 0.20/0.82  % PE eliminated: 81
% 0.20/0.82  % done 106 iterations in 0.069s
% 0.20/0.82  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.20/0.82  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.82  
% 0.20/0.82  
% 0.20/0.82  % Terminating...
% 1.85/0.95  % Runner terminated.
% 1.86/0.96  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------