TSTP Solution File: LCL539+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : LCL539+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 09:26:40 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.42s 2.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 21
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 68 ( 34 unt; 2 nHn; 46 RR)
% Number of literals : 111 ( 17 equ; 44 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 13 ( 11 usr; 11 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 70 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_97,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ modus_ponens
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_97) ).
cnf(i_0_68,plain,
modus_ponens,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_68) ).
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X2))
| ~ and_2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_60,plain,
and_2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_60) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1))
| ~ and_1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_59,plain,
and_1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_59) ).
cnf(i_0_10,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2))))
| ~ and_3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_61,plain,
and_3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_61) ).
cnf(i_0_40,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X1),X1))
| ~ axiom_M ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_40) ).
cnf(i_0_85,plain,
axiom_M,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_85) ).
cnf(i_0_114,plain,
( and(strict_implies(X1,X2),strict_implies(X2,X1)) = strict_equiv(X1,X2)
| ~ op_strict_equiv ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_114) ).
cnf(i_0_135,plain,
op_strict_equiv,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_135) ).
cnf(i_0_141,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ substitution_of_equivalents
| ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_141) ).
cnf(i_0_138,plain,
substitution_of_equivalents,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_138) ).
cnf(i_0_108,plain,
( and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) = equiv(X1,X2)
| ~ op_equiv ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_108) ).
cnf(i_0_70,plain,
op_equiv,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_70) ).
cnf(i_0_115,plain,
( necessarily(implies(X1,X2)) = strict_implies(X1,X2)
| ~ op_strict_implies ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_115) ).
cnf(i_0_136,plain,
op_strict_implies,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_136) ).
cnf(i_0_143,plain,
( substitution_strict_equiv
| is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(esk90_0,esk91_0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_143) ).
cnf(i_0_137,negated_conjecture,
~ substitution_strict_equiv,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_137) ).
cnf(i_0_142,plain,
( substitution_strict_equiv
| esk91_0 != esk90_0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tn5skqyl/lgb.p',i_0_142) ).
cnf(c_0_165,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ modus_ponens
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1)) ),
i_0_97 ).
cnf(c_0_166,plain,
modus_ponens,
i_0_68 ).
cnf(c_0_167,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X2))
| ~ and_2 ),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_168,plain,
and_2,
i_0_60 ).
cnf(c_0_169,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1))
| ~ and_1 ),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_170,plain,
and_1,
i_0_59 ).
cnf(c_0_171,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2))))
| ~ and_3 ),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_172,plain,
and_3,
i_0_61 ).
cnf(c_0_173,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X1),X1))
| ~ axiom_M ),
i_0_40 ).
cnf(c_0_174,plain,
axiom_M,
i_0_85 ).
cnf(c_0_175,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_165,c_0_166])]) ).
cnf(c_0_176,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X2)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_167,c_0_168])]) ).
cnf(c_0_177,plain,
( and(strict_implies(X1,X2),strict_implies(X2,X1)) = strict_equiv(X1,X2)
| ~ op_strict_equiv ),
i_0_114 ).
cnf(c_0_178,plain,
op_strict_equiv,
i_0_135 ).
cnf(c_0_179,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_169,c_0_170])]) ).
cnf(c_0_180,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ substitution_of_equivalents
| ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_141 ).
cnf(c_0_181,plain,
substitution_of_equivalents,
i_0_138 ).
cnf(c_0_182,plain,
( and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) = equiv(X1,X2)
| ~ op_equiv ),
i_0_108 ).
cnf(c_0_183,plain,
op_equiv,
i_0_70 ).
cnf(c_0_184,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,and(X1,X2)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_171,c_0_172])]) ).
cnf(c_0_185,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X1),X1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_173,c_0_174])]) ).
cnf(c_0_186,plain,
( necessarily(implies(X1,X2)) = strict_implies(X1,X2)
| ~ op_strict_implies ),
i_0_115 ).
cnf(c_0_187,plain,
op_strict_implies,
i_0_136 ).
cnf(c_0_188,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(and(X2,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_175,c_0_176]) ).
cnf(c_0_189,plain,
and(strict_implies(X1,X2),strict_implies(X2,X1)) = strict_equiv(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_177,c_0_178])]) ).
cnf(c_0_190,plain,
( substitution_strict_equiv
| is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(esk90_0,esk91_0)) ),
i_0_143 ).
cnf(c_0_191,negated_conjecture,
~ substitution_strict_equiv,
i_0_137 ).
cnf(c_0_192,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(and(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_175,c_0_179]) ).
cnf(c_0_193,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_180,c_0_181])]) ).
cnf(c_0_194,plain,
and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) = equiv(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_182,c_0_183])]) ).
cnf(c_0_195,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,and(X2,X1)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_175,c_0_184]) ).
cnf(c_0_196,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_175,c_0_185]) ).
cnf(c_0_197,plain,
necessarily(implies(X1,X2)) = strict_implies(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_186,c_0_187])]) ).
cnf(c_0_198,plain,
( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X2,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_188,c_0_189]) ).
cnf(c_0_199,plain,
is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(esk90_0,esk91_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_190,c_0_191]) ).
cnf(c_0_200,plain,
( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_192,c_0_189]) ).
cnf(c_0_201,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ is_a_theorem(and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_193,c_0_194]) ).
cnf(c_0_202,plain,
( is_a_theorem(and(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_175,c_0_195]) ).
cnf(c_0_203,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_196,c_0_197]) ).
cnf(c_0_204,plain,
is_a_theorem(strict_implies(esk91_0,esk90_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_198,c_0_199]) ).
cnf(c_0_205,plain,
is_a_theorem(strict_implies(esk90_0,esk91_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_200,c_0_199]) ).
cnf(c_0_206,plain,
( substitution_strict_equiv
| esk91_0 != esk90_0 ),
i_0_142 ).
cnf(c_0_207,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_201,c_0_202]) ).
cnf(c_0_208,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(esk91_0,esk90_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_203,c_0_204]) ).
cnf(c_0_209,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(esk90_0,esk91_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_203,c_0_205]) ).
cnf(c_0_210,plain,
esk91_0 != esk90_0,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_206,c_0_191]) ).
cnf(c_0_211,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_207,c_0_208]),c_0_209])]),c_0_210]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : LCL539+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 00:34:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.42/2.51 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.42/2.51 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.42/2.51 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.42/2.51 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 8.42/2.51 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.42/2.51 #
% 8.42/2.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 8.42/2.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.42/2.51
% 8.42/2.51 # Proof found!
% 8.42/2.51 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.42/2.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.42/2.51 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.42/2.51
% 8.42/2.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.42/2.51 # User time : 0.060 s
% 8.42/2.51 # System time : 0.005 s
% 8.42/2.51 # Total time : 0.065 s
% 8.42/2.51 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.42/2.51
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------