TSTP Solution File: LCL538+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LCL538+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:48:19 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 7.41s 2.70s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :  171
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  194 (  16 unt; 163 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  16   ~;  15   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   16 (  10   >;   6   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   62 (  60 usr;  60 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :  103 ( 103 usr;  94 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (;  22   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ is_a_theorem > strict_implies > strict_equiv > or > implies > equiv > and > #nlpp > possibly > not > necessarily > substitution_strict_equiv > substitution_of_equivalents > r5 > r4 > r3 > r2 > r1 > or_3 > or_2 > or_1 > op_strict_implies > op_strict_equiv > op_possibly > op_or > op_necessarily > op_implies_or > op_implies_and > op_implies > op_equiv > op_and > necessitation > modus_tollens > modus_ponens_strict_implies > modus_ponens > kn3 > kn2 > kn1 > implies_3 > implies_2 > implies_1 > equivalence_3 > equivalence_2 > equivalence_1 > cn3 > cn2 > cn1 > axiom_s4 > axiom_s3 > axiom_s2 > axiom_s1 > axiom_m9 > axiom_m8 > axiom_m7 > axiom_m6 > axiom_m5 > axiom_m4 > axiom_m3 > axiom_m2 > axiom_m10 > axiom_m1 > axiom_M > axiom_K > axiom_B > axiom_5 > axiom_4 > and_3 > and_2 > and_1 > adjunction > #skF_33 > #skF_41 > #skF_60 > #skF_57 > #skF_52 > #skF_76 > #skF_67 > #skF_49 > #skF_20 > #skF_18 > #skF_17 > #skF_78 > #skF_94 > #skF_11 > #skF_86 > #skF_31 > #skF_15 > #skF_69 > #skF_25 > #skF_55 > #skF_87 > #skF_38 > #skF_36 > #skF_80 > #skF_56 > #skF_54 > #skF_43 > #skF_79 > #skF_19 > #skF_40 > #skF_48 > #skF_7 > #skF_37 > #skF_71 > #skF_10 > #skF_16 > #skF_85 > #skF_47 > #skF_92 > #skF_65 > #skF_26 > #skF_81 > #skF_53 > #skF_14 > #skF_51 > #skF_5 > #skF_45 > #skF_46 > #skF_39 > #skF_72 > #skF_6 > #skF_13 > #skF_61 > #skF_2 > #skF_68 > #skF_82 > #skF_84 > #skF_3 > #skF_1 > #skF_89 > #skF_21 > #skF_9 > #skF_32 > #skF_64 > #skF_50 > #skF_90 > #skF_8 > #skF_30 > #skF_42 > #skF_77 > #skF_4 > #skF_22 > #skF_93 > #skF_29 > #skF_28 > #skF_35 > #skF_70 > #skF_66 > #skF_24 > #skF_27 > #skF_23 > #skF_63 > #skF_88 > #skF_44 > #skF_83 > #skF_59 > #skF_73 > #skF_91 > #skF_58 > #skF_12 > #skF_62 > #skF_34 > #skF_75 > #skF_74

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(implies_2,type,
    implies_2: $o ).

tff(r1,type,
    r1: $o ).

tff(axiom_s1,type,
    axiom_s1: $o ).

tff(equiv,type,
    equiv: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_33',type,
    '#skF_33': $i ).

tff('#skF_41',type,
    '#skF_41': $i ).

tff(r3,type,
    r3: $o ).

tff('#skF_60',type,
    '#skF_60': $i ).

tff(op_possibly,type,
    op_possibly: $o ).

tff('#skF_57',type,
    '#skF_57': $i ).

tff('#skF_52',type,
    '#skF_52': $i ).

tff(equivalence_2,type,
    equivalence_2: $o ).

tff('#skF_76',type,
    '#skF_76': $i ).

tff(axiom_m8,type,
    axiom_m8: $o ).

tff('#skF_67',type,
    '#skF_67': $i ).

tff('#skF_49',type,
    '#skF_49': $i ).

tff(and_2,type,
    and_2: $o ).

tff(axiom_4,type,
    axiom_4: $o ).

tff('#skF_20',type,
    '#skF_20': $i ).

tff(op_implies_or,type,
    op_implies_or: $o ).

tff('#skF_18',type,
    '#skF_18': $i ).

tff('#skF_17',type,
    '#skF_17': $i ).

tff('#skF_78',type,
    '#skF_78': $i ).

tff(adjunction,type,
    adjunction: $o ).

tff('#skF_94',type,
    '#skF_94': $i ).

tff(r5,type,
    r5: $o ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': $i ).

tff(kn3,type,
    kn3: $o ).

tff('#skF_86',type,
    '#skF_86': $i ).

tff('#skF_31',type,
    '#skF_31': $i ).

tff('#skF_15',type,
    '#skF_15': $i ).

tff('#skF_69',type,
    '#skF_69': $i ).

tff('#skF_25',type,
    '#skF_25': $i ).

tff(axiom_m3,type,
    axiom_m3: $o ).

tff(cn2,type,
    cn2: $o ).

tff(axiom_K,type,
    axiom_K: $o ).

tff('#skF_55',type,
    '#skF_55': $i ).

tff('#skF_87',type,
    '#skF_87': $i ).

tff(possibly,type,
    possibly: $i > $i ).

tff(r4,type,
    r4: $o ).

tff('#skF_38',type,
    '#skF_38': $i ).

tff('#skF_36',type,
    '#skF_36': $i ).

tff('#skF_80',type,
    '#skF_80': $i ).

tff(axiom_B,type,
    axiom_B: $o ).

tff('#skF_56',type,
    '#skF_56': $i ).

tff(op_strict_equiv,type,
    op_strict_equiv: $o ).

tff('#skF_54',type,
    '#skF_54': $i ).

tff(axiom_5,type,
    axiom_5: $o ).

tff('#skF_43',type,
    '#skF_43': $i ).

tff('#skF_79',type,
    '#skF_79': $i ).

tff(op_and,type,
    op_and: $o ).

tff('#skF_19',type,
    '#skF_19': $i ).

tff('#skF_40',type,
    '#skF_40': $i ).

tff('#skF_48',type,
    '#skF_48': $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff('#skF_37',type,
    '#skF_37': $i ).

tff(and_3,type,
    and_3: $o ).

tff(is_a_theorem,type,
    is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).

tff(op_implies_and,type,
    op_implies_and: $o ).

tff(op_strict_implies,type,
    op_strict_implies: $o ).

tff('#skF_71',type,
    '#skF_71': $i ).

tff(equivalence_1,type,
    equivalence_1: $o ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': $i ).

tff(kn2,type,
    kn2: $o ).

tff('#skF_16',type,
    '#skF_16': $i ).

tff('#skF_85',type,
    '#skF_85': $i ).

tff(equivalence_3,type,
    equivalence_3: $o ).

tff(and_1,type,
    and_1: $o ).

tff('#skF_47',type,
    '#skF_47': $i ).

tff('#skF_92',type,
    '#skF_92': $i ).

tff('#skF_65',type,
    '#skF_65': $i ).

tff(cn1,type,
    cn1: $o ).

tff('#skF_26',type,
    '#skF_26': $i ).

tff('#skF_81',type,
    '#skF_81': $i ).

tff(necessitation,type,
    necessitation: $o ).

tff('#skF_53',type,
    '#skF_53': $i ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': $i ).

tff('#skF_51',type,
    '#skF_51': $i ).

tff(or_1,type,
    or_1: $o ).

tff(implies_3,type,
    implies_3: $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff('#skF_45',type,
    '#skF_45': $i ).

tff(axiom_s4,type,
    axiom_s4: $o ).

tff('#skF_46',type,
    '#skF_46': $i ).

tff('#skF_39',type,
    '#skF_39': $i ).

tff(or,type,
    or: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(modus_tollens,type,
    modus_tollens: $o ).

tff('#skF_72',type,
    '#skF_72': $i ).

tff(r2,type,
    r2: $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': $i ).

tff(not,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_61',type,
    '#skF_61': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_68',type,
    '#skF_68': $i ).

tff(axiom_m2,type,
    axiom_m2: $o ).

tff(modus_ponens,type,
    modus_ponens: $o ).

tff('#skF_82',type,
    '#skF_82': $i ).

tff('#skF_84',type,
    '#skF_84': $i ).

tff(op_or,type,
    op_or: $o ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff(substitution_of_equivalents,type,
    substitution_of_equivalents: $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(axiom_s3,type,
    axiom_s3: $o ).

tff(substitution_strict_equiv,type,
    substitution_strict_equiv: $o ).

tff(axiom_M,type,
    axiom_M: $o ).

tff(strict_implies,type,
    strict_implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_89',type,
    '#skF_89': $i ).

tff('#skF_21',type,
    '#skF_21': $i ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i ).

tff('#skF_32',type,
    '#skF_32': $i ).

tff(necessarily,type,
    necessarily: $i > $i ).

tff(axiom_m4,type,
    axiom_m4: $o ).

tff('#skF_64',type,
    '#skF_64': $i ).

tff(op_equiv,type,
    op_equiv: $o ).

tff('#skF_50',type,
    '#skF_50': $i ).

tff('#skF_90',type,
    '#skF_90': $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i ).

tff('#skF_30',type,
    '#skF_30': $i ).

tff(modus_ponens_strict_implies,type,
    modus_ponens_strict_implies: $o ).

tff(axiom_m7,type,
    axiom_m7: $o ).

tff('#skF_42',type,
    '#skF_42': $i ).

tff(axiom_s2,type,
    axiom_s2: $o ).

tff('#skF_77',type,
    '#skF_77': $i ).

tff(or_3,type,
    or_3: $o ).

tff(op_necessarily,type,
    op_necessarily: $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff('#skF_22',type,
    '#skF_22': $i ).

tff(strict_equiv,type,
    strict_equiv: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_93',type,
    '#skF_93': $i ).

tff(kn1,type,
    kn1: $o ).

tff(axiom_m6,type,
    axiom_m6: $o ).

tff('#skF_29',type,
    '#skF_29': $i ).

tff('#skF_28',type,
    '#skF_28': $i ).

tff('#skF_35',type,
    '#skF_35': $i ).

tff('#skF_70',type,
    '#skF_70': $i ).

tff('#skF_66',type,
    '#skF_66': $i ).

tff('#skF_24',type,
    '#skF_24': $i ).

tff('#skF_27',type,
    '#skF_27': $i ).

tff('#skF_23',type,
    '#skF_23': $i ).

tff(and,type,
    and: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_63',type,
    '#skF_63': $i ).

tff(axiom_m1,type,
    axiom_m1: $o ).

tff('#skF_88',type,
    '#skF_88': $i ).

tff(implies_1,type,
    implies_1: $o ).

tff('#skF_44',type,
    '#skF_44': $i ).

tff('#skF_83',type,
    '#skF_83': $i ).

tff(axiom_m10,type,
    axiom_m10: $o ).

tff(op_implies,type,
    op_implies: $o ).

tff(implies,type,
    implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_59',type,
    '#skF_59': $i ).

tff(axiom_m9,type,
    axiom_m9: $o ).

tff('#skF_73',type,
    '#skF_73': $i ).

tff('#skF_91',type,
    '#skF_91': $i ).

tff(cn3,type,
    cn3: $o ).

tff(or_2,type,
    or_2: $o ).

tff('#skF_58',type,
    '#skF_58': $i ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': $i ).

tff(axiom_m5,type,
    axiom_m5: $o ).

tff('#skF_62',type,
    '#skF_62': $i ).

tff('#skF_34',type,
    '#skF_34': $i ).

tff('#skF_75',type,
    '#skF_75': $i ).

tff('#skF_74',type,
    '#skF_74': $i ).

tff(f_489,negated_conjecture,
    ~ modus_ponens_strict_implies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_modus_ponens_strict_implies) ).

tff(f_305,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens_strict_implies
  <=> ! [X,Y] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X)
          & is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X,Y)) )
       => is_a_theorem(Y) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',modus_ponens_strict_implies) ).

tff(f_484,axiom,
    op_strict_implies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s1_0_op_strict_implies) ).

tff(f_437,axiom,
    ( op_strict_implies
   => ! [X,Y] : ( strict_implies(X,Y) = necessarily(implies(X,Y)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+1.ax',op_strict_implies) ).

tff(f_475,axiom,
    axiom_M,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+3.ax',km4b_axiom_M) ).

tff(f_328,axiom,
    ( axiom_M
  <=> ! [X] : is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X),X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL007+0.ax',axiom_M) ).

tff(f_247,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_modus_ponens) ).

tff(f_60,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X,Y] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X)
          & is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y)) )
       => is_a_theorem(Y) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens) ).

tff(c_294,plain,
    ~ modus_ponens_strict_implies,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_489]) ).

tff(c_166,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem('#skF_58')
    | modus_ponens_strict_implies ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_305]) ).

tff(c_322,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem('#skF_58'),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_294,c_166]) ).

tff(c_170,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem('#skF_57')
    | modus_ponens_strict_implies ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_305]) ).

tff(c_320,plain,
    is_a_theorem('#skF_57'),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_294,c_170]) ).

tff(c_168,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies('#skF_57','#skF_58'))
    | modus_ponens_strict_implies ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_305]) ).

tff(c_321,plain,
    is_a_theorem(strict_implies('#skF_57','#skF_58')),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_294,c_168]) ).

tff(c_288,plain,
    op_strict_implies,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_484]) ).

tff(c_266,plain,
    ! [X_107,Y_108] :
      ( ( necessarily(implies(X_107,Y_108)) = strict_implies(X_107,Y_108) )
      | ~ op_strict_implies ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_437]) ).

tff(c_299,plain,
    ! [X_107,Y_108] : ( necessarily(implies(X_107,Y_108)) = strict_implies(X_107,Y_108) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_288,c_266]) ).

tff(c_276,plain,
    axiom_M,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_475]) ).

tff(c_192,plain,
    ! [X_75] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X_75),X_75))
      | ~ axiom_M ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_328]) ).

tff(c_313,plain,
    ! [X_75] : is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X_75),X_75)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_276,c_192]) ).

tff(c_128,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_247]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [Y_2,X_1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(Y_2)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_1,Y_2))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X_1)
      | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_60]) ).

tff(c_1238,plain,
    ! [Y_217,X_218] :
      ( is_a_theorem(Y_217)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_218,Y_217))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X_218) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_128,c_2]) ).

tff(c_1274,plain,
    ! [X_219] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X_219)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(X_219)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_313,c_1238]) ).

tff(c_2053,plain,
    ! [X_295,Y_296] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(X_295,Y_296))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X_295,Y_296)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_299,c_1274]) ).

tff(c_2093,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies('#skF_57','#skF_58')),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_321,c_2053]) ).

tff(c_413,plain,
    ! [Y_2,X_1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(Y_2)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_1,Y_2))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X_1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_128,c_2]) ).

tff(c_2096,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem('#skF_58')
    | ~ is_a_theorem('#skF_57') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2093,c_413]) ).

tff(c_2099,plain,
    is_a_theorem('#skF_58'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_320,c_2096]) ).

tff(c_2101,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_322,c_2099]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : LCL538+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 14:31:34 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 7.41/2.70  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.41/2.70  
% 7.41/2.70  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.66/2.74  
% 7.66/2.74  Inference rules
% 7.66/2.74  ----------------------
% 7.66/2.74  #Ref     : 0
% 7.66/2.74  #Sup     : 395
% 7.66/2.74  #Fact    : 0
% 7.66/2.74  #Define  : 0
% 7.66/2.74  #Split   : 66
% 7.66/2.74  #Chain   : 0
% 7.66/2.74  #Close   : 0
% 7.66/2.74  
% 7.66/2.74  Ordering : KBO
% 7.66/2.74  
% 7.66/2.74  Simplification rules
% 7.66/2.74  ----------------------
% 7.66/2.74  #Subsume      : 20
% 7.66/2.74  #Demod        : 157
% 7.66/2.74  #Tautology    : 97
% 7.66/2.74  #SimpNegUnit  : 14
% 7.66/2.74  #BackRed      : 0
% 7.66/2.74  
% 7.66/2.74  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 7.66/2.74  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 7.66/2.74  
% 7.66/2.74  Timing (in seconds)
% 7.66/2.74  ----------------------
% 7.66/2.75  Preprocessing        : 0.70
% 7.66/2.75  Parsing              : 0.34
% 7.66/2.75  CNF conversion       : 0.07
% 7.66/2.75  Main loop            : 0.93
% 7.66/2.75  Inferencing          : 0.30
% 7.66/2.75  Reduction            : 0.33
% 7.66/2.75  Demodulation         : 0.23
% 7.66/2.75  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 7.66/2.75  Subsumption          : 0.17
% 7.66/2.75  Abstraction          : 0.04
% 7.66/2.75  MUC search           : 0.00
% 7.66/2.75  Cooper               : 0.00
% 7.66/2.75  Total                : 1.69
% 7.66/2.75  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 7.66/2.75  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 7.66/2.75  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 7.66/2.75  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------