TSTP Solution File: LCL520+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : LCL520+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:11:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.38s 23.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   83 (  50 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  139 (  23 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   97 (  41   ~;  38   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   13 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  10 usr;  10 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;  10 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  121 (   5 sgn  36   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(op_and,axiom,
    ( op_and
   => ! [X1,X2] : and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_and) ).

fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).

fof(principia_op_and,axiom,
    op_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',principia_op_and) ).

fof(op_implies_or,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_or) ).

fof(op_or,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X1,X2] : or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_or) ).

fof(rosser_op_implies_and,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_op_implies_and) ).

fof(principia_op_implies_or,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',principia_op_implies_or) ).

fof(rosser_op_or,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_op_or) ).

fof(kn1,axiom,
    ( kn1
  <=> ! [X4] : is_a_theorem(implies(X4,and(X4,X4))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',kn1) ).

fof(rosser_kn1,axiom,
    kn1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_kn1) ).

fof(kn2,axiom,
    ( kn2
  <=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X4,X5),X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',kn2) ).

fof(modus_ponens,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X1)
          & is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) )
       => is_a_theorem(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens) ).

fof(kn3,axiom,
    ( kn3
  <=> ! [X4,X5,X6] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,X5),implies(not(and(X5,X6)),not(and(X6,X4))))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',kn3) ).

fof(rosser_kn2,axiom,
    kn2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_kn2) ).

fof(rosser_modus_ponens,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_modus_ponens) ).

fof(rosser_kn3,axiom,
    kn3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_kn3) ).

fof(principia_r3,conjecture,
    r3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',principia_r3) ).

fof(r3,axiom,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X4,X5),or(X5,X4))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r3) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ op_and
      | and(X3,X4) = not(or(not(X3),not(X4))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_and])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ op_implies_and
      | implies(X3,X4) = not(and(X3,not(X4))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2)))
    | ~ op_and ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    op_and,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_and]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ op_implies_or
      | implies(X3,X4) = or(not(X3),X4) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_or])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ op_or
      | or(X3,X4) = not(and(not(X3),not(X4))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_or])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2)))
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_op_implies_and]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_implies_or]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2)))
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_op_or]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    not(not(or(not(X1),not(not(X2))))) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25])]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X5] :
      ( ( ~ kn1
        | is_a_theorem(implies(X5,and(X5,X5))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk33_0,and(esk33_0,esk33_0)))
        | kn1 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kn1])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) = or(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    not(not(implies(X1,not(not(X2))))) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,and(X1,X1)))
    | ~ kn1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    kn1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_kn1]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    or(X1,X2) = implies(not(X1),X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_26]),c_0_32]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,and(X1,X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    implies(not(not(X1)),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,not(implies(X1,not(X1))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_26]),c_0_38]),c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    implies(X1,not(implies(X2,not(not(X3))))) = not(not(implies(X1,not(implies(X2,X3))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_35]) ).

fof(c_0_43,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( ( ~ kn2
        | is_a_theorem(implies(and(X6,X7),X6)) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(esk34_0,esk35_0),esk34_0))
        | kn2 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kn2])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_44,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ modus_ponens
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X3)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X4))
        | is_a_theorem(X4) )
      & ( is_a_theorem(esk1_0)
        | modus_ponens )
      & ( is_a_theorem(implies(esk1_0,esk2_0))
        | modus_ponens )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(esk2_0)
        | modus_ponens ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    is_a_theorem(not(not(implies(X1,not(implies(X1,not(X1))))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_40]),c_0_40]),c_0_42]) ).

fof(c_0_46,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9] :
      ( ( ~ kn3
        | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X7,X8),implies(not(and(X8,X9)),not(and(X9,X7))))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk36_0,esk37_0),implies(not(and(esk37_0,esk38_0)),not(and(esk38_0,esk36_0)))))
        | kn3 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kn3])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1))
    | ~ kn2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    kn2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_kn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_modus_ponens]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    is_a_theorem(not(not(not(not(implies(X1,not(implies(X1,not(X1))))))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_40]),c_0_40]),c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(not(and(X2,X3)),not(and(X3,X1)))))
    | ~ kn3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    kn3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_kn3]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48])]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50])]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    is_a_theorem(not(not(not(not(not(not(implies(X1,not(implies(X1,not(X1))))))))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_40]),c_0_40]),c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(not(and(X2,X3)),not(and(X3,X1))))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53])]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(X2,not(not(X3)))) = not(not(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,not(not(X2))),X3) = implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(X1,not(X2))),X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_26]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    implies(not(implies(X1,not(not(X2)))),X3) = implies(not(implies(X1,X2)),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(not(not(X2)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    is_a_theorem(not(not(not(not(not(not(not(not(implies(not(X1),not(implies(not(X1),X1)))))))))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    is_a_theorem(not(not(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,not(X3)),implies(X3,not(X1))))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_26]),c_0_26]),c_0_38]),c_0_40]),c_0_38]),c_0_40]),c_0_40]),c_0_58]) ).

fof(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r3,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[principia_r3]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,not(not(X3))))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X2,X3),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(X1,X2)),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X2),not(implies(not(X2),X2))),X1)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63]),c_0_40]),c_0_40]),c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),implies(implies(X2,not(X3)),implies(X3,X1)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_58]),c_0_35]) ).

fof(c_0_70,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( ( ~ r3
        | is_a_theorem(implies(or(X6,X7),or(X7,X6))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk48_0,esk49_0),or(esk49_0,esk48_0)))
        | r3 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r3])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_71,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r3,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(implies(X2,X3)),X2),X1)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]),c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(implies(not(X1),X1)),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_69]) ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    ( r3
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk48_0,esk49_0),or(esk49_0,esk48_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_70]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_71]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_73]) ).

cnf(c_0_77,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk48_0,esk49_0),or(esk49_0,esk48_0))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_75]) ).

cnf(c_0_78,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X2,X2),X1)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_76]),c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_79,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(not(X3),X1)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_80,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk48_0),esk49_0),implies(not(esk49_0),esk48_0))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_38]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_81,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),implies(not(X2),X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_79]) ).

cnf(c_0_82,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_81])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : LCL520+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 15:07:21 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.38/23.41  eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.38/23.41  
% 0.38/23.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.38/23.46  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.38/23.56  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 0.38/23.56  
% 0.38/23.56  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.38/23.56  # OLD status Res
% 0.38/23.56  # Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 0.38/23.56  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f6eb5f7f05126ea361481ae651a4823314e3d740 for 23 seconds:
% 0.38/23.56  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 0.38/23.56  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 0.38/23.56  
% 0.38/23.56  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.38/23.56  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.38/23.56  # Parsed axioms                        : 43
% 0.38/23.56  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 41
% 0.38/23.56  # Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.38/23.56  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 0.38/23.56  # Processed clauses                    : 3
% 0.38/23.56  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.38/23.56  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2
% 0.38/23.56  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2
% 0.38/23.56  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.38/23.56  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.38/23.56  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.38/23.56  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.38/23.56  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 492
% 0.38/23.56  
% 0.38/23.56  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/23.56  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.38/23.56  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.38/23.56  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.38/23.56  # Maximum resident set size: 2788 pages
% 0.38/23.56  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a172c605141d0894bf6fdc293a5220c6c2a32117 for 23 seconds:
% 0.38/23.56  # Preprocessing time       : 0.020 s
% 0.38/23.56  
% 0.38/23.56  # Proof found!
% 0.38/23.56  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.38/23.56  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.38/23.56  # Proof object total steps             : 83
% 0.38/23.56  # Proof object clause steps            : 54
% 0.38/23.56  # Proof object formula steps           : 29
% 0.38/23.56  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 0.38/23.56  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 0.38/23.56  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.38/23.56  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 18
% 0.38/23.56  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 18
% 0.38/23.56  # Proof object generating inferences   : 19
% 0.38/23.56  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 52
% 0.38/23.56  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.38/23.56  # Parsed axioms                        : 43
% 0.38/23.56  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Initial clauses                      : 72
% 0.38/23.56  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 72
% 0.38/23.56  # Processed clauses                    : 431
% 0.38/23.56  # ...of these trivial                  : 103
% 0.38/23.56  # ...subsumed                          : 40
% 0.38/23.56  # ...remaining for further processing  : 288
% 0.38/23.56  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Backward-rewritten                   : 189
% 0.38/23.56  # Generated clauses                    : 3059
% 0.38/23.56  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1653
% 0.38/23.56  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Paramodulations                      : 3059
% 0.38/23.56  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Current number of processed clauses  : 99
% 0.38/23.56  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 59
% 0.38/23.56  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.38/23.56  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.38/23.56  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 39
% 0.38/23.56  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 187
% 0.38/23.56  # ...number of literals in the above   : 236
% 0.38/23.56  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Current number of archived clauses   : 189
% 0.38/23.56  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 746
% 0.38/23.56  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 726
% 0.38/23.56  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 39
% 0.38/23.56  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 584
% 0.38/23.56  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3692
% 0.38/23.56  # BW rewrite match successes           : 205
% 0.38/23.56  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.38/23.56  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 74285
% 0.38/23.56  
% 0.38/23.56  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/23.56  # User time                : 0.077 s
% 0.38/23.56  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.38/23.56  # Total time               : 0.082 s
% 0.38/23.56  # Maximum resident set size: 6212 pages
% 0.38/46.43  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.38/46.45  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.38/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.38/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.38/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.38/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.38/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.38/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.38/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.38/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.38/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.38/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.38/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.38/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.38/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.38/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.38/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.38/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.38/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.38/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.38/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------