TSTP Solution File: LCL517+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : LCL517+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 13:47:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 3.01s 3.30s
% Output   : Refutation 3.01s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : LCL517+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jul  2 15:55:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.43/1.07  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.43/1.07  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.43/1.07  Process 29403 was started by sandbox on n007.cluster.edu,
% 0.43/1.07  Sat Jul  2 15:55:41 2022
% 0.43/1.07  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_29223_n007.cluster.edu".
% 0.43/1.07  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.43/1.07  
% 0.43/1.07  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.43/1.07  
% 0.43/1.07  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_29223_n007.cluster.edu
% 0.43/1.07  
% 0.43/1.07  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.43/1.07  set(auto2).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.43/1.07      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.43/1.07      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.43/1.07      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.43/1.07  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.43/1.07  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.43/1.07  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.43/1.07  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.43/1.07  clear(print_given).
% 0.43/1.07  
% 0.43/1.07  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (43 formulas)
% 0.43/1.07  
% 0.43/1.07  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.43/1.07  
% 0.43/1.07  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/1.07  
% 0.43/1.07  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.43/1.07  
% 0.43/1.07  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.43/1.07  1 modus_ponens <-> (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(X) & is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y)) -> is_a_theorem(Y))) # label(modus_ponens) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.07  2 substitution_of_equivalents <-> (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(equiv(X,Y)) -> X = Y)) # label(substitution_of_equivalents) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.07  3 modus_tollens <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(Y),not(X)),implies(X,Y)))) # label(modus_tollens) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.07  4 implies_1 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X)))) # label(implies_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.07  5 implies_2 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(X,Y)),implies(X,Y)))) # label(implies_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.07  6 implies_3 <-> (all X all Y all Z is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(X,Z))))) # label(implies_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.07  7 and_1 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),X))) # label(and_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.07  8 and_2 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),Y))) # label(and_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.07  9 and_3 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,and(X,Y))))) # label(and_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.07  10 or_1 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(X,or(X,Y)))) # label(or_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.07  11 or_2 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(Y,or(X,Y)))) # label(or_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.07  12 or_3 <-> (all X all Y all Z is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Z),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(or(X,Y),Z))))) # label(or_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.07  13 equivalence_1 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X,Y),implies(X,Y)))) # label(equivalence_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/1.07  14 equivalence_2 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X,Y),implies(Y,X)))) # label(equivalence_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  15 equivalence_3 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,X),equiv(X,Y))))) # label(equivalence_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  16 kn1 <-> (all P is_a_theorem(implies(P,and(P,P)))) # label(kn1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  17 kn2 <-> (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(and(P,Q),P))) # label(kn2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  18 kn3 <-> (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(implies(P,Q),implies(not(and(Q,R)),not(and(R,P)))))) # label(kn3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  19 cn1 <-> (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(implies(P,Q),implies(implies(Q,R),implies(P,R))))) # label(cn1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  20 cn2 <-> (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(P,implies(not(P),Q)))) # label(cn2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  21 cn3 <-> (all P is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(P),P),P))) # label(cn3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  22 r1 <-> (all P is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,P),P))) # label(r1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  23 r2 <-> (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(Q,or(P,Q)))) # label(r2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  24 r3 <-> (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,Q),or(Q,P)))) # label(r3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  25 r4 <-> (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,or(Q,R)),or(Q,or(P,R))))) # label(r4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  26 r5 <-> (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Q,R),implies(or(P,Q),or(P,R))))) # label(r5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  27 op_or -> (all X all Y or(X,Y) = not(and(not(X),not(Y)))) # label(op_or) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  28 op_and -> (all X all Y and(X,Y) = not(or(not(X),not(Y)))) # label(op_and) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  29 op_implies_and -> (all X all Y implies(X,Y) = not(and(X,not(Y)))) # label(op_implies_and) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  30 op_implies_or -> (all X all Y implies(X,Y) = or(not(X),Y)) # label(op_implies_or) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  31 op_equiv -> (all X all Y equiv(X,Y) = and(implies(X,Y),implies(Y,X))) # label(op_equiv) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  Term ordering decisions:
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  % Assigning unary symbol not kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (94).
% 1.39/1.65  Function symbol KB weights:  c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. c5=1. c6=1. c7=1. c8=1. c9=1. c10=1. c11=1. c12=1. c13=1. c14=1. c15=1. c16=1. c17=1. c18=1. c19=1. c20=1. c21=1. c22=1. c23=1. c24=1. c25=1. c26=1. c27=1. c28=1. c29=1. c30=1. c31=1. c32=1. c33=1. c34=1. c35=1. c36=1. c37=1. c38=1. c39=1. c40=1. c41=1. c42=1. c43=1. c44=1. c45=1. c46=1. c47=1. c48=1. c49=1. c50=1. c51=1. c52=1. c53=1. c54=1. c55=1. implies=1. or=1. and=1. equiv=1. not=0.
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  % Starting search at 0.02 seconds.
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  Low Water (keep): wt=37.000, iters=3438
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  Low Water (keep): wt=31.000, iters=3353
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  Low Water (keep): wt=30.000, iters=3639
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  Low Water (keep): wt=25.000, iters=3390
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  Low Water (keep): wt=24.000, iters=3402
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  Low Water (keep): wt=23.000, iters=3361
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  Low Water (keep): wt=22.000, iters=3391
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  Low Water (keep): wt=21.000, iters=3422
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  Low Water (keep): wt=20.000, iters=3555
% 1.39/1.65  
% 1.39/1.65  Low Water (keep): wt=19.000, iters=3339
% 1.39/1.65  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (keep): wt=18.000, iters=3344
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (keep): wt=17.000, iters=3358
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (keep): wt=16.000, iters=3364
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (keep): wt=15.000, iters=3382
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (displace): id=3270, wt=51.000
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (displace): id=3277, wt=49.000
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (displace): id=1614, wt=47.000
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (displace): id=2744, wt=45.000
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (displace): id=3269, wt=43.000
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (displace): id=3279, wt=41.000
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (displace): id=3465, wt=40.000
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (displace): id=3271, wt=39.000
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (displace): id=3230, wt=38.000
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (displace): id=3280, wt=37.000
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (displace): id=3281, wt=35.000
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (displace): id=10904, wt=14.000
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (displace): id=10960, wt=13.000
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (displace): id=11784, wt=11.000
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  NOTE: Back_subsumption disabled, ratio of kept to back_subsumed is 36 (0.00 of 1.16 sec).
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (displace): id=12327, wt=10.000
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (displace): id=12771, wt=9.000
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Low Water (keep): wt=14.000, iters=3346
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 3.01/3.30  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.01/3.30  % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  % Proof 1 at 2.15 (+ 0.10) seconds.
% 3.01/3.30  % Length of proof is 60.
% 3.01/3.30  % Level of proof is 21.
% 3.01/3.30  % Maximum clause weight is 14.000.
% 3.01/3.30  % Given clauses 831.
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  1 modus_ponens <-> (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(X) & is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y)) -> is_a_theorem(Y))) # label(modus_ponens) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 3.01/3.30  16 kn1 <-> (all P is_a_theorem(implies(P,and(P,P)))) # label(kn1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 3.01/3.30  17 kn2 <-> (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(and(P,Q),P))) # label(kn2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 3.01/3.30  18 kn3 <-> (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(implies(P,Q),implies(not(and(Q,R)),not(and(R,P)))))) # label(kn3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 3.01/3.30  21 cn3 <-> (all P is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(P),P),P))) # label(cn3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 3.01/3.30  22 r1 <-> (all P is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,P),P))) # label(r1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 3.01/3.30  27 op_or -> (all X all Y or(X,Y) = not(and(not(X),not(Y)))) # label(op_or) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 3.01/3.30  29 op_implies_and -> (all X all Y implies(X,Y) = not(and(X,not(Y)))) # label(op_implies_and) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 3.01/3.30  32 op_or # label(rosser_op_or) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 3.01/3.30  33 op_implies_and # label(rosser_op_implies_and) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 3.01/3.30  35 modus_ponens # label(rosser_modus_ponens) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 3.01/3.30  36 kn1 # label(rosser_kn1) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 3.01/3.30  37 kn2 # label(rosser_kn2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 3.01/3.30  38 kn3 # label(rosser_kn3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 3.01/3.30  41 -cn3 # label(luka_cn3) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 3.01/3.30  52 -kn1 | is_a_theorem(implies(A,and(A,A))) # label(kn1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(16)].
% 3.01/3.30  53 is_a_theorem(implies(A,and(A,A))).  [copy(52),unit_del(a,36)].
% 3.01/3.30  55 -kn2 | is_a_theorem(implies(and(A,B),A)) # label(kn2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(17)].
% 3.01/3.30  56 is_a_theorem(implies(and(A,B),A)).  [copy(55),unit_del(a,37)].
% 3.01/3.30  58 -r1 | is_a_theorem(implies(or(A,A),A)) # label(r1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(22)].
% 3.01/3.30  59 r1 | -is_a_theorem(implies(or(c45,c45),c45)) # label(r1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(22)].
% 3.01/3.30  66 cn3 | -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(c44),c44),c44)) # label(cn3) # label(axiom).  [clausify(21)].
% 3.01/3.30  67 -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(c44),c44),c44)).  [copy(66),unit_del(a,41)].
% 3.01/3.30  68 -modus_ponens | -is_a_theorem(A) | -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) | is_a_theorem(B) # label(modus_ponens) # label(axiom).  [clausify(1)].
% 3.01/3.30  69 -is_a_theorem(A) | -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) | is_a_theorem(B).  [copy(68),unit_del(a,35)].
% 3.01/3.30  79 -op_implies_and | not(and(A,not(B))) = implies(A,B) # label(op_implies_and) # label(axiom).  [clausify(29)].
% 3.01/3.30  80 not(and(A,not(B))) = implies(A,B).  [copy(79),unit_del(a,33)].
% 3.01/3.30  85 -op_or | or(A,B) = not(and(not(A),not(B))) # label(op_or) # label(axiom).  [clausify(27)].
% 3.01/3.30  86 or(A,B) = implies(not(A),B).  [copy(85),rewrite([80(6)]),unit_del(a,32)].
% 3.01/3.30  109 -kn3 | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(not(and(B,C)),not(and(C,A))))) # label(kn3) # label(axiom).  [clausify(18)].
% 3.01/3.30  110 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(not(and(B,C)),not(and(C,A))))).  [copy(109),unit_del(a,38)].
% 3.01/3.30  118 r1 | -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(c45),c45),c45)).  [back_rewrite(59),rewrite([86(4)])].
% 3.01/3.30  119 -r1 | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),A),A)).  [back_rewrite(58),rewrite([86(2)])].
% 3.01/3.30  129 not(and(A,implies(B,C))) = implies(A,and(B,not(C))).  [para(80(a,1),80(a,1,1,2))].
% 3.01/3.30  133 -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) | is_a_theorem(implies(not(and(B,C)),not(and(C,A)))).  [resolve(110,a,69,b)].
% 3.01/3.30  139 -r1.  [ur(119,b,67,a)].
% 3.01/3.30  140 -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(c45),c45),c45)).  [back_unit_del(118),unit_del(a,139)].
% 3.01/3.30  277 is_a_theorem(implies(not(and(and(A,A),B)),not(and(B,A)))).  [resolve(133,a,53,a)].
% 3.01/3.30  358 -is_a_theorem(not(and(and(A,A),B))) | is_a_theorem(not(and(B,A))).  [resolve(277,a,69,b)].
% 3.01/3.30  408 -is_a_theorem(implies(and(A,A),B)) | is_a_theorem(not(and(not(B),A))).  [para(80(a,1),358(a,1))].
% 3.01/3.30  704 is_a_theorem(not(and(not(A),A))).  [resolve(408,a,56,a)].
% 3.01/3.30  737 is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(A)),A)).  [para(80(a,1),704(a,1))].
% 3.01/3.30  740 is_a_theorem(implies(not(and(A,B)),implies(B,not(A)))).  [resolve(737,a,133,a),rewrite([80(6)])].
% 3.01/3.30  742 -is_a_theorem(not(not(A))) | is_a_theorem(A).  [resolve(737,a,69,b)].
% 3.01/3.30  1174 -is_a_theorem(not(and(A,B))) | is_a_theorem(implies(B,not(A))).  [resolve(740,a,69,b)].
% 3.01/3.30  1787 -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) | is_a_theorem(implies(not(B),not(A))).  [para(80(a,1),1174(a,1))].
% 3.01/3.30  4885 is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),not(and(A,B)))).  [resolve(1787,a,56,a)].
% 3.01/3.30  4886 is_a_theorem(implies(not(and(A,A)),not(A))).  [resolve(1787,a,53,a)].
% 3.01/3.30  4966 is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),implies(A,B))).  [para(80(a,1),4885(a,1,2))].
% 3.01/3.30  4973 is_a_theorem(implies(not(and(implies(A,B),C)),implies(C,A))).  [resolve(4966,a,133,a),rewrite([80(6)])].
% 3.01/3.30  5385 -is_a_theorem(not(and(A,A))) | is_a_theorem(not(A)).  [resolve(4886,a,69,b)].
% 3.01/3.30  5487 -is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),A)) | is_a_theorem(not(not(A))).  [para(80(a,1),5385(a,1))].
% 3.01/3.30  11808 -is_a_theorem(not(and(implies(A,B),C))) | is_a_theorem(implies(C,A)).  [resolve(4973,a,69,b)].
% 3.01/3.30  11827 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(not(C),A))).  [para(80(a,1),4973(a,1,1))].
% 3.01/3.30  14047 -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),C)) | is_a_theorem(implies(not(C),A)).  [para(80(a,1),11808(a,1))].
% 3.01/3.30  15365 is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(not(A),B)),implies(B,C))).  [resolve(14047,a,11827,a)].
% 3.01/3.30  16122 is_a_theorem(not(not(implies(not(A),not(A))))).  [resolve(15365,a,5487,a)].
% 3.01/3.30  16153 is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),not(A))).  [resolve(16122,a,742,a)].
% 3.01/3.30  16334 is_a_theorem(implies(not(and(not(A),B)),implies(B,A))).  [resolve(16153,a,133,a),rewrite([80(6)])].
% 3.01/3.30  17617 $F.  [ur(69,b,16334,a,c,140,a),rewrite([129(8)]),unit_del(a,53)].
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  % SZS output end Refutation
% 3.01/3.30  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Given=831. Generated=166722. Kept=17566. proofs=1.
% 3.01/3.30  Usable=822. Sos=9999. Demods=5. Limbo=33, Disabled=6784. Hints=0.
% 3.01/3.30  Megabytes=14.49.
% 3.01/3.30  User_CPU=2.15, System_CPU=0.10, Wall_clock=2.
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  ============================== end of search =========================
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  THEOREM PROVED
% 3.01/3.30  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 3.01/3.30  
% 3.01/3.30  Process 29403 exit (max_proofs) Sat Jul  2 15:55:43 2022
% 3.01/3.30  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------