TSTP Solution File: LCL512+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : LCL512+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:11:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.26s 1.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   25 (  12   ~;   8   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   2 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(hilbert_equivalence_1,conjecture,
    equivalence_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',hilbert_equivalence_1) ).

fof(kn2,axiom,
    ( kn2
  <=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X4,X5),X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',kn2) ).

fof(op_equiv,axiom,
    ( op_equiv
   => ! [X1,X2] : equiv(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_equiv) ).

fof(equivalence_1,axiom,
    ( equivalence_1
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X1,X2),implies(X1,X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',equivalence_1) ).

fof(rosser_kn2,axiom,
    kn2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_kn2) ).

fof(rosser_op_equiv,axiom,
    op_equiv,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+5.ax',rosser_op_equiv) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equivalence_1,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hilbert_equivalence_1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( ( ~ kn2
        | is_a_theorem(implies(and(X6,X7),X6)) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(esk34_0,esk35_0),esk34_0))
        | kn2 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kn2])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ op_equiv
      | equiv(X3,X4) = and(implies(X3,X4),implies(X4,X3)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_equiv])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ equivalence_1
        | is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X3,X4),implies(X3,X4))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(esk27_0,esk28_0),implies(esk27_0,esk28_0)))
        | equivalence_1 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equivalence_1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equivalence_1,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1))
    | ~ kn2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    kn2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_kn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( equiv(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ op_equiv ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    op_equiv,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_op_equiv]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( equivalence_1
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(esk27_0,esk28_0),implies(esk27_0,esk28_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equivalence_1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) = equiv(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(esk27_0,esk28_0),implies(esk27_0,esk28_0))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X1,X2),implies(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : LCL512+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 09:25:45 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.26/1.44  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.26/1.44  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.26/1.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.26/1.44  
% 0.26/1.44  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.26/1.44  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.26/1.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 43
% 0.26/1.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 41
% 0.26/1.44  # Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.26/1.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 0.26/1.44  # Processed clauses                    : 3
% 0.26/1.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.26/1.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2
% 0.26/1.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2
% 0.26/1.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.26/1.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/1.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.26/1.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.26/1.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 492
% 0.26/1.44  
% 0.26/1.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/1.44  # User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.26/1.44  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.26/1.44  # Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.26/1.44  # Maximum resident set size: 2728 pages
% 0.26/1.44  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.26/1.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.020 s
% 0.26/1.44  
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof found!
% 0.26/1.44  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/1.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object total steps             : 22
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object clause steps            : 11
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 6
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 7
% 0.26/1.44  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.26/1.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 43
% 0.26/1.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Initial clauses                      : 72
% 0.26/1.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 72
% 0.26/1.44  # Processed clauses                    : 520
% 0.26/1.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 10
% 0.26/1.44  # ...subsumed                          : 194
% 0.26/1.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 316
% 0.26/1.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 18
% 0.26/1.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 8
% 0.26/1.44  # Generated clauses                    : 1356
% 0.26/1.44  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1228
% 0.26/1.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 281
% 0.26/1.44  # Paramodulations                      : 1356
% 0.26/1.44  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 290
% 0.26/1.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 19
% 0.26/1.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/1.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.26/1.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 270
% 0.26/1.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 772
% 0.26/1.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2595
% 0.26/1.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 26
% 0.26/1.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 26674
% 0.26/1.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12390
% 0.26/1.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 491
% 0.26/1.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 58
% 0.26/1.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 13
% 0.26/1.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 9
% 0.26/1.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 18406
% 0.26/1.44  
% 0.26/1.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/1.44  # User time                : 0.058 s
% 0.26/1.44  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.26/1.44  # Total time               : 0.064 s
% 0.26/1.44  # Maximum resident set size: 4380 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------