TSTP Solution File: LCL501+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : LCL501+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:11:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.64s 56.82s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.64s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 17
% Number of leaves : 29
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 140 ( 63 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 262 ( 32 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 218 ( 96 ~; 89 |; 15 &)
% ( 11 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 12 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 19 ( 17 usr; 17 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 29 ( 29 usr; 24 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 207 ( 9 sgn 68 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(op_implies_or,axiom,
( op_implies_or
=> ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_or) ).
fof(op_and,axiom,
( op_and
=> ! [X1,X2] : and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_and) ).
fof(principia_op_implies_or,axiom,
op_implies_or,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_op_implies_or) ).
fof(op_or,axiom,
( op_or
=> ! [X1,X2] : or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_or) ).
fof(principia_op_and,axiom,
op_and,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_op_and) ).
fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
( op_implies_and
=> ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).
fof(r2,axiom,
( r2
<=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(X5,or(X4,X5))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r2) ).
fof(rosser_op_or,axiom,
op_or,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',rosser_op_or) ).
fof(rosser_op_implies_and,axiom,
op_implies_and,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',rosser_op_implies_and) ).
fof(principia_r2,axiom,
r2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_r2) ).
fof(r4,axiom,
( r4
<=> ! [X4,X5,X6] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X4,or(X5,X6)),or(X5,or(X4,X6)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r4) ).
fof(r1,axiom,
( r1
<=> ! [X4] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X4,X4),X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r1) ).
fof(r3,axiom,
( r3
<=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X4,X5),or(X5,X4))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r3) ).
fof(modus_ponens,axiom,
( modus_ponens
<=> ! [X1,X2] :
( ( is_a_theorem(X1)
& is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) )
=> is_a_theorem(X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens) ).
fof(op_equiv,axiom,
( op_equiv
=> ! [X1,X2] : equiv(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_equiv) ).
fof(principia_r4,axiom,
r4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_r4) ).
fof(rosser_kn3,conjecture,
kn3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',rosser_kn3) ).
fof(principia_r1,axiom,
r1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_r1) ).
fof(principia_r3,axiom,
r3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_r3) ).
fof(principia_modus_ponens,axiom,
modus_ponens,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_modus_ponens) ).
fof(implies_1,axiom,
( implies_1
<=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_1) ).
fof(equivalence_3,axiom,
( equivalence_3
<=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X1),equiv(X1,X2)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',equivalence_3) ).
fof(principia_op_equiv,axiom,
op_equiv,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_op_equiv) ).
fof(r5,axiom,
( r5
<=> ! [X4,X5,X6] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X5,X6),implies(or(X4,X5),or(X4,X6)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r5) ).
fof(kn3,axiom,
( kn3
<=> ! [X4,X5,X6] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,X5),implies(not(and(X5,X6)),not(and(X6,X4))))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',kn3) ).
fof(substitution_of_equivalents,axiom,
( substitution_of_equivalents
<=> ! [X1,X2] :
( is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2))
=> X1 = X2 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',substitution_of_equivalents) ).
fof(principia_r5,axiom,
r5,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_r5) ).
fof(substitution_of_equivalents_001,axiom,
substitution_of_equivalents,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',substitution_of_equivalents) ).
fof(modus_tollens,axiom,
( modus_tollens
<=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X2),not(X1)),implies(X1,X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_tollens) ).
fof(c_0_29,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ op_implies_or
| implies(X3,X4) = or(not(X3),X4) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_or])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_30,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ op_and
| and(X3,X4) = not(or(not(X3),not(X4))) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_and])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2)
| ~ op_implies_or ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
op_implies_or,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_implies_or]) ).
fof(c_0_33,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ op_or
| or(X3,X4) = not(and(not(X3),not(X4))) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_or])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2)))
| ~ op_and ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
op_and,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_and]) ).
fof(c_0_37,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ op_implies_and
| implies(X3,X4) = not(and(X3,not(X4))) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_38,plain,
! [X6,X7] :
( ( ~ r2
| is_a_theorem(implies(X7,or(X6,X7))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk47_0,or(esk46_0,esk47_0)))
| r2 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r2])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2)))
| ~ op_or ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
and(X1,X2) = not(implies(X1,not(X2))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36])]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
op_or,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_op_or]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2)))
| ~ op_implies_and ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
op_implies_and,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_op_implies_and]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1)))
| ~ r2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
or(X1,X2) = not(not(implies(not(X1),not(not(X2))))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41])]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
r2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r2]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43])]) ).
fof(c_0_48,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9] :
( ( ~ r4
| is_a_theorem(implies(or(X7,or(X8,X9)),or(X8,or(X7,X9)))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk50_0,or(esk51_0,esk52_0)),or(esk51_0,or(esk50_0,esk52_0))))
| r4 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r4])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_49,plain,
! [X5] :
( ( ~ r1
| is_a_theorem(implies(or(X5,X5),X5)) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk45_0,esk45_0),esk45_0))
| r1 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r1])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_50,plain,
! [X6,X7] :
( ( ~ r3
| is_a_theorem(implies(or(X6,X7),or(X7,X6))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk48_0,esk49_0),or(esk49_0,esk48_0)))
| r3 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r3])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_51,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ modus_ponens
| ~ is_a_theorem(X3)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X4))
| is_a_theorem(X4) )
& ( is_a_theorem(esk1_0)
| modus_ponens )
& ( is_a_theorem(implies(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| modus_ponens )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(esk2_0)
| modus_ponens ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,not(not(implies(not(X2),not(not(X1))))))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_46])]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
not(not(implies(X1,not(not(X2))))) = implies(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_40]) ).
fof(c_0_54,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ op_equiv
| equiv(X3,X4) = and(implies(X3,X4),implies(X4,X3)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_equiv])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3))))
| ~ r4 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
r4,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r4]) ).
fof(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
~ kn3,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[rosser_kn3]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X1),X1))
| ~ r1 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_49]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
r1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r1]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1)))
| ~ r3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]) ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
r3,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r3]) ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ modus_ponens ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
modus_ponens,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_modus_ponens]) ).
fof(c_0_64,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ implies_1
| is_a_theorem(implies(X3,implies(X4,X3))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk7_0,implies(esk8_0,esk7_0)))
| implies_1 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_1])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(not(X2),X1))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
implies(not(not(X1)),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_45]),c_0_53]) ).
fof(c_0_67,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ equivalence_3
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,X4),implies(implies(X4,X3),equiv(X3,X4)))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk31_0,esk32_0),implies(implies(esk32_0,esk31_0),equiv(esk31_0,esk32_0))))
| equivalence_3 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equivalence_3])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_68,plain,
( equiv(X1,X2) = and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1))
| ~ op_equiv ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_54]) ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
op_equiv,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_equiv]) ).
fof(c_0_70,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9] :
( ( ~ r5
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X8,X9),implies(or(X7,X8),or(X7,X9)))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk54_0,esk55_0),implies(or(esk53_0,esk54_0),or(esk53_0,esk55_0))))
| r5 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r5])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(implies(not(X1),not(not(not(not(implies(not(X2),not(not(X3)))))))))),not(not(implies(not(X2),not(not(not(not(implies(not(X1),not(not(X3)))))))))))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_56])]) ).
fof(c_0_72,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9] :
( ( ~ kn3
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X7,X8),implies(not(and(X8,X9)),not(and(X9,X7))))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk36_0,esk37_0),implies(not(and(esk37_0,esk38_0)),not(and(esk38_0,esk36_0)))))
| kn3 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kn3])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_73,negated_conjecture,
~ kn3,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_57]) ).
cnf(c_0_74,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(implies(not(X1),not(not(X1))))),X1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_45]),c_0_59])]) ).
cnf(c_0_75,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(implies(not(X1),not(not(X2))))),not(not(implies(not(X2),not(not(X1))))))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_61])]) ).
cnf(c_0_76,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63])]) ).
cnf(c_0_77,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1)))
| ~ implies_1 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_64]) ).
cnf(c_0_78,plain,
( implies_1
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk7_0,implies(esk8_0,esk7_0))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_64]) ).
cnf(c_0_79,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_65,c_0_66]) ).
fof(c_0_80,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ substitution_of_equivalents
| ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X3,X4))
| X3 = X4 )
& ( is_a_theorem(equiv(esk3_0,esk4_0))
| substitution_of_equivalents )
& ( esk3_0 != esk4_0
| substitution_of_equivalents ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[substitution_of_equivalents])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_81,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X1),equiv(X1,X2))))
| ~ equivalence_3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_67]) ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
equiv(X1,X2) = not(implies(implies(X1,X2),not(implies(X2,X1)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_40]),c_0_69])]) ).
cnf(c_0_83,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2))))
| ~ r5 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_70]) ).
cnf(c_0_84,plain,
r5,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r5]) ).
cnf(c_0_85,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),implies(not(X2),X3)),implies(not(X2),implies(not(X1),X3)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_53]),c_0_53]),c_0_53]),c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_86,plain,
( kn3
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk36_0,esk37_0),implies(not(and(esk37_0,esk38_0)),not(and(esk38_0,esk36_0))))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_72]) ).
cnf(c_0_87,negated_conjecture,
~ kn3,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_73]) ).
cnf(c_0_88,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X1),X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_89,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),implies(not(X2),X1))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_75,c_0_53]),c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_90,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ implies_1
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_77]) ).
cnf(c_0_91,plain,
implies_1,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_79])]) ).
cnf(c_0_92,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2))
| ~ substitution_of_equivalents ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_80]) ).
cnf(c_0_93,plain,
substitution_of_equivalents,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[substitution_of_equivalents]) ).
cnf(c_0_94,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X1),not(implies(implies(X1,X2),not(implies(X2,X1)))))))
| ~ equivalence_3 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_82]) ).
fof(c_0_95,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ modus_tollens
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X4),not(X3)),implies(X3,X4))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk6_0),not(esk5_0)),implies(esk5_0,esk6_0)))
| modus_tollens ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_tollens])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_96,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(not(not(implies(not(X3),not(not(X1))))),not(not(implies(not(X3),not(not(X2)))))))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_45]),c_0_45]),c_0_84])]) ).
cnf(c_0_97,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(not(X2),X3)),implies(not(X2),implies(X1,X3)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_66]),c_0_66]) ).
cnf(c_0_98,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk36_0,esk37_0),implies(not(not(implies(esk37_0,not(esk38_0)))),not(not(implies(esk38_0,not(esk36_0))))))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_40]),c_0_40]),c_0_87]) ).
cnf(c_0_99,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X1)) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_88]) ).
cnf(c_0_100,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X2),X1)) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_89]) ).
cnf(c_0_101,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_91])]) ).
cnf(c_0_102,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ is_a_theorem(equiv(X1,X2)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_92,c_0_93])]) ).
cnf(c_0_103,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),not(implies(implies(X2,X1),not(implies(X1,X2))))))
| ~ equivalence_3
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1)) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_94]) ).
cnf(c_0_104,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)))
| ~ modus_tollens ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_95]) ).
cnf(c_0_105,plain,
( modus_tollens
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk6_0),not(esk5_0)),implies(esk5_0,esk6_0))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_95]) ).
cnf(c_0_106,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_66]) ).
cnf(c_0_107,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(not(X3),X1),implies(not(X3),X2)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_96,c_0_53]),c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_108,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),implies(X2,X3)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,implies(not(X1),X3))) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_97]) ).
cnf(c_0_109,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk36_0,esk37_0),implies(implies(esk37_0,not(esk38_0)),not(not(implies(esk38_0,not(esk36_0))))))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_98,c_0_66]) ).
cnf(c_0_110,plain,
implies(X1,implies(X2,not(not(X3)))) = not(not(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)))),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_111,plain,
( is_a_theorem(not(X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,not(X1))) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_99,c_0_66]) ).
cnf(c_0_112,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_100,c_0_101]) ).
cnf(c_0_113,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ is_a_theorem(not(implies(implies(X1,X2),not(implies(X2,X1))))) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_102,c_0_82]) ).
cnf(c_0_114,plain,
( is_a_theorem(not(implies(implies(X1,X2),not(implies(X2,X1)))))
| ~ equivalence_3
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_103]) ).
cnf(c_0_115,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,not(X2)),implies(X2,not(X1))))
| ~ modus_tollens ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_104,c_0_66]) ).
cnf(c_0_116,plain,
modus_tollens,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_105,c_0_106])]) ).
cnf(c_0_117,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),implies(not(X1),X3)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X3)) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_107]) ).
cnf(c_0_118,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)),implies(X2,implies(X1,X3)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_97,c_0_66]),c_0_66]) ).
cnf(c_0_119,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),implies(X2,X2))),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_108,c_0_79]) ).
cnf(c_0_120,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(not(not(implies(implies(esk36_0,esk37_0),implies(implies(esk37_0,not(esk38_0)),implies(esk38_0,not(esk36_0))))))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_110]) ).
cnf(c_0_121,plain,
( is_a_theorem(not(not(X1)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_111,c_0_112]) ).
cnf(c_0_122,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ equivalence_3
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_113,c_0_114]) ).
cnf(c_0_123,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,not(X2)),implies(X2,not(X1)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_116])]) ).
cnf(c_0_124,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X1,X3)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X3)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_117,c_0_66]),c_0_66]) ).
cnf(c_0_125,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,implies(X1,X3))) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_118]) ).
cnf(c_0_126,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X1)),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_99,c_0_119]) ).
cnf(c_0_127,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk36_0,esk37_0),implies(implies(esk37_0,not(esk38_0)),implies(esk38_0,not(esk36_0))))),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_120,c_0_121]) ).
cnf(c_0_128,plain,
( implies(X1,not(X2)) = implies(X2,not(X1))
| ~ equivalence_3 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_122,c_0_123]),c_0_123])]) ).
cnf(c_0_129,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X2)) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_124]) ).
cnf(c_0_130,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(implies(X1,X2),X2))),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_125,c_0_126]) ).
cnf(c_0_131,plain,
( ~ equivalence_3
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk36_0,esk37_0),implies(implies(esk37_0,not(esk38_0)),implies(esk36_0,not(esk38_0))))) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_127,c_0_128]) ).
cnf(c_0_132,plain,
( implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)) = implies(X2,implies(X1,X3))
| ~ equivalence_3 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_122,c_0_118]),c_0_118])]) ).
cnf(c_0_133,plain,
( equivalence_3
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk31_0,esk32_0),implies(implies(esk32_0,esk31_0),equiv(esk31_0,esk32_0)))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_67]) ).
cnf(c_0_134,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,X3),X3),X2)) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_129,c_0_130]) ).
cnf(c_0_135,plain,
( ~ equivalence_3
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk36_0,esk37_0),implies(esk36_0,implies(implies(esk37_0,not(esk38_0)),not(esk38_0))))) ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_131,c_0_132]) ).
cnf(c_0_136,plain,
( equivalence_3
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk31_0,esk32_0),implies(implies(esk32_0,esk31_0),not(implies(implies(esk31_0,esk32_0),not(implies(esk32_0,esk31_0))))))) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_133,c_0_82]) ).
cnf(c_0_137,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,not(implies(X1,not(X2)))))),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_134,c_0_123]) ).
cnf(c_0_138,plain,
~ equivalence_3,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_135,c_0_124]),c_0_130])]) ).
cnf(c_0_139,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_136,c_0_137])]),c_0_138]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : LCL501+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 07:28:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.39/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.39/23.48 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.47 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.50 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.64/56.82 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.64/56.82
% 0.64/56.82 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.64/56.82 # OLD status Res
% 0.64/56.82 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.64/56.82 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_773c90a94152ea2e8c9d3df9c4b1eb6152c40c03 for 23 seconds:
% 0.64/56.82 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,,100,1.0)
% 0.64/56.82 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 0.64/56.82
% 0.64/56.82 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.64/56.82 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.64/56.82 # Parsed axioms : 45
% 0.64/56.82 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 43
% 0.64/56.82 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.64/56.82 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.64/56.82 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.64/56.82 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.64/56.82 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.64/56.82 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.64/56.82 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.64/56.82 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.64/56.82 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Termbank termtop insertions : 551
% 0.64/56.82
% 0.64/56.82 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.64/56.82 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.64/56.82 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.64/56.82 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.64/56.82 # Maximum resident set size: 2740 pages
% 0.64/56.82 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_75515770aeb32f68e33e9fbd9dff93f5a2e34f2e for 23 seconds:
% 0.64/56.82
% 0.64/56.82 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.64/56.82 # OLD status Res
% 0.64/56.82 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.64/56.82 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_6c565d2524e660970ec2a72c26d577f665a55420 for 23 seconds:
% 0.64/56.82 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 0.64/56.82
% 0.64/56.82 # Proof found!
% 0.64/56.82 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.64/56.82 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.64/56.82 # Proof object total steps : 140
% 0.64/56.82 # Proof object clause steps : 93
% 0.64/56.82 # Proof object formula steps : 47
% 0.64/56.82 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.64/56.82 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.64/56.82 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.64/56.82 # Proof object initial clauses used : 32
% 0.64/56.82 # Proof object initial formulas used : 29
% 0.64/56.82 # Proof object generating inferences : 31
% 0.64/56.82 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 78
% 0.64/56.82 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.64/56.82 # Parsed axioms : 45
% 0.64/56.82 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Initial clauses : 74
% 0.64/56.82 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Initial clauses in saturation : 74
% 0.64/56.82 # Processed clauses : 32278
% 0.64/56.82 # ...of these trivial : 1358
% 0.64/56.82 # ...subsumed : 26581
% 0.64/56.82 # ...remaining for further processing : 4339
% 0.64/56.82 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 300164
% 0.64/56.82 # Backward-subsumed : 947
% 0.64/56.82 # Backward-rewritten : 2097
% 0.64/56.82 # Generated clauses : 784739
% 0.64/56.82 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 744162
% 0.64/56.82 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 17823
% 0.64/56.82 # Paramodulations : 784715
% 0.64/56.82 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Current number of processed clauses : 1285
% 0.64/56.82 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 459
% 0.64/56.82 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Negative unit clauses : 180
% 0.64/56.82 # Non-unit-clauses : 646
% 0.64/56.82 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 103327
% 0.64/56.82 # ...number of literals in the above : 226407
% 0.64/56.82 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Current number of archived clauses : 3044
% 0.64/56.82 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3751307
% 0.64/56.82 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2532143
% 0.64/56.82 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 27247
% 0.64/56.82 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 50660
% 0.64/56.82 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # BW rewrite match attempts : 65439
% 0.64/56.82 # BW rewrite match successes : 382
% 0.64/56.82 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.64/56.82 # Termbank termtop insertions : 12557277
% 0.64/56.82
% 0.64/56.82 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.64/56.82 # User time : 9.827 s
% 0.64/56.82 # System time : 0.131 s
% 0.64/56.82 # Total time : 9.958 s
% 0.64/56.82 # Maximum resident set size: 155216 pages
% 0.64/69.48 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.64/69.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.64/69.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.64/69.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.64/69.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.64/69.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.64/69.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.64/69.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.64/69.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.64/69.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.64/69.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.64/69.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.64/69.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.64/69.53 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.64/69.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.64/69.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.64/69.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.64/69.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.64/69.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.64/69.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.64/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.64/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.64/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.64/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.64/69.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.64/69.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.64/69.58 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.64/69.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.64/69.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.64/69.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.64/69.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.64/69.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.64/69.61 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------