TSTP Solution File: LCL500+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : LCL500+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:12:57 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 18
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 69 ( 36 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 124 ( 18 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 94 ( 39 ~; 37 |; 8 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 10 usr; 10 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 11 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 100 ( 6 sgn; 38 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(r5,axiom,
( r5
<=> ! [X4,X5,X6] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X5,X6),implies(or(X4,X5),or(X4,X6)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',r5) ).
fof(op_implies_or,axiom,
( op_implies_or
=> ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',op_implies_or) ).
fof(modus_ponens,axiom,
( modus_ponens
<=> ! [X1,X2] :
( ( is_a_theorem(X1)
& is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) )
=> is_a_theorem(X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',modus_ponens) ).
fof(principia_r5,axiom,
r5,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',principia_r5) ).
fof(principia_op_implies_or,axiom,
op_implies_or,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',principia_op_implies_or) ).
fof(op_and,axiom,
( op_and
=> ! [X1,X2] : and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',op_and) ).
fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
( op_implies_and
=> ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',op_implies_and) ).
fof(principia_modus_ponens,axiom,
modus_ponens,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',principia_modus_ponens) ).
fof(r2,axiom,
( r2
<=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(X5,or(X4,X5))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',r2) ).
fof(op_or,axiom,
( op_or
=> ! [X1,X2] : or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',op_or) ).
fof(principia_op_and,axiom,
op_and,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',principia_op_and) ).
fof(rosser_op_implies_and,axiom,
op_implies_and,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',rosser_op_implies_and) ).
fof(r3,axiom,
( r3
<=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X4,X5),or(X5,X4))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',r3) ).
fof(principia_r2,axiom,
r2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',principia_r2) ).
fof(rosser_op_or,axiom,
op_or,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',rosser_op_or) ).
fof(principia_r3,axiom,
r3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',principia_r3) ).
fof(kn2,axiom,
( kn2
<=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X4,X5),X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',kn2) ).
fof(rosser_kn2,conjecture,
kn2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p',rosser_kn2) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X111,X112,X113] :
( ( ~ r5
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X112,X113),implies(or(X111,X112),or(X111,X113)))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk54_0,esk55_0),implies(or(esk53_0,esk54_0),or(esk53_0,esk55_0))))
| r5 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r5])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X123,X124] :
( ~ op_implies_or
| implies(X123,X124) = or(not(X123),X124) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_or])])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X7,X8] :
( ( ~ modus_ponens
| ~ is_a_theorem(X7)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X7,X8))
| is_a_theorem(X8) )
& ( is_a_theorem(esk1_0)
| modus_ponens )
& ( is_a_theorem(implies(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| modus_ponens )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(esk2_0)
| modus_ponens ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2))))
| ~ r5 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
r5,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r5]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2)
| ~ op_implies_or ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
op_implies_or,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_implies_or]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X119,X120] :
( ~ op_and
| and(X119,X120) = not(or(not(X119),not(X120))) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_and])])]) ).
fof(c_0_26,plain,
! [X121,X122] :
( ~ op_implies_and
| implies(X121,X122) = not(and(X121,not(X122))) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X2)
| ~ modus_ponens
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
modus_ponens,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_modus_ponens]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]) ).
fof(c_0_31,plain,
! [X97,X98] :
( ( ~ r2
| is_a_theorem(implies(X98,or(X97,X98))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk47_0,or(esk46_0,esk47_0)))
| r2 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r2])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_32,plain,
! [X117,X118] :
( ~ op_or
| or(X117,X118) = not(and(not(X117),not(X118))) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_or])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2)))
| ~ op_and ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
op_and,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_and]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2)))
| ~ op_implies_and ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
op_implies_and,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_op_implies_and]) ).
fof(c_0_37,plain,
! [X101,X102] :
( ( ~ r3
| is_a_theorem(implies(or(X101,X102),or(X102,X101))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk48_0,esk49_0),or(esk49_0,esk48_0)))
| r3 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r3])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( is_a_theorem(X1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X3,X1),implies(X3,X2)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1)))
| ~ r2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
r2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r2]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2)))
| ~ op_or ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
and(X1,X2) = not(implies(X1,not(X2))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_30]),c_0_34])]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
op_or,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rosser_op_or]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36])]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1)))
| ~ r3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
r3,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r3]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X1,X3)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X3)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41])]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
not(not(implies(not(X1),not(not(X2))))) = or(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),c_0_44])]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
not(not(implies(X1,not(not(X2))))) = implies(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_43]) ).
fof(c_0_52,plain,
! [X73,X74] :
( ( ~ kn2
| is_a_theorem(implies(and(X73,X74),X73)) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(esk34_0,esk35_0),esk34_0))
| kn2 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kn2])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
~ kn2,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[rosser_kn2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47])]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
implies(not(X1),X2) = or(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
( kn2
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(esk34_0,esk35_0),esk34_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_52]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
~ kn2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(or(X2,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_54]) ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,X1),X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]) ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),X2),or(X2,X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_57]) ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(esk34_0,esk35_0),esk34_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]) ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
( is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X2),X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_57]) ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X1,X2))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]) ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(or(implies(esk34_0,not(esk35_0)),esk34_0)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_43]),c_0_57]) ).
cnf(c_0_67,plain,
is_a_theorem(or(implies(X1,X2),X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]),c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_68,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : LCL500+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 12:44:01 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.liRyHxPWx6/E---3.1_11890.p
% 0.18/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.18/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 11977 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 0.18/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.49 # Search class: FGUSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 750s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting U----_207d_00_B07_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI with pid 11998 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI
% 0.18/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.49 # Search class: FGUSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 750s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 45
% 0.18/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Initial clauses : 74
% 0.18/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 74
% 0.18/0.49 # Processed clauses : 348
% 0.18/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 24
% 0.18/0.49 # ...subsumed : 105
% 0.18/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 219
% 0.18/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 22
% 0.18/0.49 # Generated clauses : 654
% 0.18/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 594
% 0.18/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Paramodulations : 654
% 0.18/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 242
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 136
% 0.18/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 52
% 0.18/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.18/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.18/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 78
% 0.18/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 377
% 0.18/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 667
% 0.18/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 83
% 0.18/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 706
% 0.18/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 704
% 0.18/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 102
% 0.18/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 282
% 0.18/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 170
% 0.18/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 23
% 0.18/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 11448
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49 # User time : 0.019 s
% 0.18/0.49 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.18/0.49 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.18/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1956 pages
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49 # User time : 0.076 s
% 0.18/0.49 # System time : 0.024 s
% 0.18/0.49 # Total time : 0.100 s
% 0.18/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
% 0.18/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------