TSTP Solution File: LCL499+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LCL499+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eE3SVd9aDW true

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:59:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 1.02s 0.78s
% Output   : Refutation 1.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   24
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   54 (  26 unt;  12 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (  10 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  200 (  16   ~;  13   |;   1   &; 163   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   8   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   14 (  12 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   0   ^;  45   !;   0   ?;  45   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(op_and_type,type,
    op_and: $o ).

thf(and_type,type,
    and: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(is_a_theorem_type,type,
    is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).

thf(r1_type,type,
    r1: $o ).

thf(or_type,type,
    or: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk__32_type,type,
    sk__32: $i ).

thf(op_implies_or_type,type,
    op_implies_or: $o ).

thf(r3_type,type,
    r3: $o ).

thf(kn1_type,type,
    kn1: $o ).

thf(modus_ponens_type,type,
    modus_ponens: $o ).

thf(implies_type,type,
    implies: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(not_type,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

thf(kn1,axiom,
    ( kn1
  <=> ! [P: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ P @ ( and @ P @ P ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl34,plain,
    ( kn1
    | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ sk__32 @ ( and @ sk__32 @ sk__32 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[kn1]) ).

thf(rosser_kn1,conjecture,
    kn1 ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ kn1,
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[rosser_kn1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl73,plain,
    ~ kn1,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl363,plain,
    ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ sk__32 @ ( and @ sk__32 @ sk__32 ) ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl34,zip_derived_cl73]) ).

thf(principia_op_implies_or,axiom,
    op_implies_or ).

thf(zip_derived_cl60,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[principia_op_implies_or]) ).

thf(op_implies_or,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
        ( ( implies @ X @ Y )
        = ( or @ ( not @ X ) @ Y ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( implies @ X0 @ X1 )
        = ( or @ ( not @ X0 ) @ X1 ) )
      | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[op_implies_or]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl337,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( implies @ X1 @ X0 )
      = ( or @ ( not @ X1 ) @ X0 ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl60,zip_derived_cl58]) ).

thf(principia_r1,axiom,
    r1 ).

thf(zip_derived_cl64,plain,
    r1,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[principia_r1]) ).

thf(r1,axiom,
    ( r1
  <=> ! [P: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( or @ P @ P ) @ P ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl45,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( or @ X0 @ X0 ) @ X0 ) )
      | ~ r1 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[r1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl357,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( or @ X0 @ X0 ) @ X0 ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl64,zip_derived_cl45]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl373,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X0 @ ( not @ X0 ) ) @ ( not @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl337,zip_derived_cl357]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl337_001,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( implies @ X1 @ X0 )
      = ( or @ ( not @ X1 ) @ X0 ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl60,zip_derived_cl58]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl337_002,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( implies @ X1 @ X0 )
      = ( or @ ( not @ X1 ) @ X0 ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl60,zip_derived_cl58]) ).

thf(principia_r3,axiom,
    r3 ).

thf(zip_derived_cl66,plain,
    r3,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[principia_r3]) ).

thf(r3,axiom,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [P: $i,Q: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( or @ P @ Q ) @ ( or @ Q @ P ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( or @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( or @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
      | ~ r3 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[r3]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl359,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( or @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( or @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl66,zip_derived_cl49]) ).

thf(principia_modus_ponens,axiom,
    modus_ponens ).

thf(zip_derived_cl63,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[principia_modus_ponens]) ).

thf(modus_ponens,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
        ( ( ( is_a_theorem @ X )
          & ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) )
       => ( is_a_theorem @ Y ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( is_a_theorem @ X0 )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X1 )
      | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[modus_ponens]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl365,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X1 )
      | ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ X0 ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl63,zip_derived_cl0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl403,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( or @ X0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ ( or @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl359,zip_derived_cl365]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl425,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ ( or @ X0 @ ( not @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl337,zip_derived_cl403]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl554,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X0 @ ( not @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ ( not @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl337,zip_derived_cl425]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl561,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X0 @ ( not @ ( implies @ X0 @ ( not @ X0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl373,zip_derived_cl554]) ).

thf(principia_op_and,axiom,
    op_and ).

thf(zip_derived_cl61,plain,
    op_and,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[principia_op_and]) ).

thf(op_and,axiom,
    ( op_and
   => ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
        ( ( and @ X @ Y )
        = ( not @ ( or @ ( not @ X ) @ ( not @ Y ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( and @ X0 @ X1 )
        = ( not @ ( or @ ( not @ X0 ) @ ( not @ X1 ) ) ) )
      | ~ op_and ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[op_and]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl335,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( and @ X1 @ X0 )
      = ( not @ ( or @ ( not @ X1 ) @ ( not @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl61,zip_derived_cl56]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl337_003,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( implies @ X1 @ X0 )
      = ( or @ ( not @ X1 ) @ X0 ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl60,zip_derived_cl58]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl375,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( and @ X1 @ X0 )
      = ( not @ ( implies @ X1 @ ( not @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl335,zip_derived_cl337]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl569,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X0 @ ( and @ X0 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl561,zip_derived_cl375]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl649,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl363,zip_derived_cl569]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : LCL499+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.eE3SVd9aDW true
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 18:37:23 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.34  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.34  % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.65  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.65  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.65  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.20/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 1.02/0.78  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.02/0.78  % BCE start: 74
% 1.02/0.78  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 1.02/0.78  % PE start: 74
% 1.02/0.78  logic: eq
% 1.02/0.78  % PE eliminated: 42
% 1.02/0.78  % done 81 iterations in 0.066s
% 1.02/0.78  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.02/0.78  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.02/0.78  
% 1.02/0.78  
% 1.02/0.78  % Terminating...
% 1.52/0.84  % Runner terminated.
% 1.52/0.86  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------