TSTP Solution File: LCL499+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : LCL499+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:48:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.55s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   65 (  27 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  116 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   85 (  34   ~;  29   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   9 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   9 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (  66   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f248,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f142,f161,f247]) ).

fof(f247,plain,
    spl1_4,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f244]) ).

fof(f244,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl1_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f231,f141]) ).

fof(f141,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0)))
    | spl1_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f139]) ).

fof(f139,plain,
    ( spl1_4
  <=> is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0))) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_4])]) ).

fof(f231,plain,
    ! [X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(X2,and(X2,X2))),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f229,f125]) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : implies(X1,X0) = or(not(X1),X0),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f112,f107]) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f32,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_op_implies_or) ).

fof(f112,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ op_implies_or
      | implies(X1,X0) = or(not(X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ( ~ op_implies_or
    | ! [X0,X1] : implies(X1,X0) = or(not(X1),X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f63]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X0,X1] : implies(X1,X0) = or(not(X1),X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f30,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X1,X0] : implies(X0,X1) = or(not(X0),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_implies_or) ).

fof(f229,plain,
    ! [X2] : is_a_theorem(or(not(X2),and(X2,X2))),
    inference(resolution,[],[f187,f195]) ).

fof(f195,plain,
    ! [X2] : is_a_theorem(or(and(X2,X2),not(X2))),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f181,f194]) ).

fof(f194,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X5] : or(and(X3,X4),X5) = implies(implies(X3,not(X4)),X5),
    inference(superposition,[],[f125,f179]) ).

fof(f179,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : not(implies(X1,not(X0))) = and(X1,X0),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f178,f125]) ).

fof(f178,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : and(X1,X0) = not(or(not(X1),not(X0))),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f119,f122]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    op_and,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f33,axiom,
    op_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_op_and) ).

fof(f119,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ op_and
      | and(X1,X0) = not(or(not(X1),not(X0))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f84]) ).

fof(f84,plain,
    ( ~ op_and
    | ! [X0,X1] : and(X1,X0) = not(or(not(X1),not(X0))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f69]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ( op_and
   => ! [X0,X1] : and(X1,X0) = not(or(not(X1),not(X0))) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    ( op_and
   => ! [X1,X0] : and(X0,X1) = not(or(not(X0),not(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',op_and) ).

fof(f181,plain,
    ! [X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X2,not(X2)),not(X2))),
    inference(superposition,[],[f176,f125]) ).

fof(f176,plain,
    ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X0),X0)),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f120,f108]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    r1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f36,axiom,
    r1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_r1) ).

fof(f120,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X0),X0))
      | ~ r1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).

fof(f83,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X0),X0))
    | ~ r1 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f74]) ).

fof(f74,plain,
    ( r1
   => ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X0),X0)) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f49]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ( r1
  <=> ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X0,X0),X0)) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f22,axiom,
    ( ! [X3] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X3,X3),X3))
  <=> r1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r1) ).

fof(f187,plain,
    ! [X6,X5] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(or(X6,X5))
      | is_a_theorem(or(X5,X6)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f162,f143]) ).

fof(f143,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X0),or(X0,X1))),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f102,f106]) ).

fof(f106,plain,
    r3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f38,axiom,
    r3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_r3) ).

fof(f102,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ r3
      | is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X0),or(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f79]) ).

fof(f79,plain,
    ( ~ r3
    | ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X0),or(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f72]) ).

fof(f72,plain,
    ( r3
   => ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X0),or(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f66]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X0),or(X0,X1))) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f24,axiom,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [X4,X3] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X3,X4),or(X4,X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r3) ).

fof(f162,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0))
      | is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f99,f109]) ).

fof(f109,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f35,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_modus_ponens) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
      | is_a_theorem(X0)
      | ~ modus_ponens
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f93]) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ( ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
        | is_a_theorem(X0)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0)) )
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f82]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    ( ! [X1,X0] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | is_a_theorem(X1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1)) )
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f81]) ).

fof(f81,plain,
    ( ! [X1,X0] :
        ( is_a_theorem(X1)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) )
    | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ( modus_ponens
   => ! [X1,X0] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
          & is_a_theorem(X0) )
       => is_a_theorem(X1) ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ( ! [X1,X0] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
          & is_a_theorem(X0) )
       => is_a_theorem(X1) )
  <=> modus_ponens ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',modus_ponens) ).

fof(f161,plain,
    ~ spl1_3,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f121,f135]) ).

fof(f135,plain,
    ( spl1_3
  <=> kn1 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_3])]) ).

fof(f121,plain,
    ~ kn1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ~ kn1,
    inference(flattening,[],[f46]) ).

fof(f46,negated_conjecture,
    ~ kn1,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f45]) ).

fof(f45,conjecture,
    kn1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rosser_kn1) ).

fof(f142,plain,
    ( spl1_3
    | ~ spl1_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f117,f139,f135]) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0)))
    | kn1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f96,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0)))
    | kn1 ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f86,f95]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ( ? [X0] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,and(X0,X0)))
   => ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sK0,and(sK0,sK0))) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f86,plain,
    ( ? [X0] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,and(X0,X0)))
    | kn1 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,and(X0,X0)))
   => kn1 ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f61]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ( kn1
  <=> ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,and(X0,X0))) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    ( kn1
  <=> ! [X3] : is_a_theorem(implies(X3,and(X3,X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kn1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem    : LCL499+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 01:50:00 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.54  % (15817)ott+2_1:1_fsr=off:gsp=on:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.20/0.54  % (15825)ott+10_1:1_tgt=ground:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.20/0.54  % (15825)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.55  % (15825)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.55  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.55  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.55  % (15825)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.55  % (15825)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.55  % (15825)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.55  % (15825)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.55  
% 0.20/0.55  % (15825)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.20/0.55  % (15825)Time elapsed: 0.114 s
% 0.20/0.55  % (15825)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.20/0.55  % (15825)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.55  % (15825)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.55  % (15806)Success in time 0.194 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------