TSTP Solution File: LCL496+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : LCL496+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 09:26:24 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 11.37s 2.85s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 11.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  19 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   76 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (  27   ~;  25   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   6 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;  11 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   0 sgn  26   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(modus_ponens,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X1)
          & is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) )
       => is_a_theorem(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens) ).

fof(r4,axiom,
    ( r4
  <=> ! [X4,X5,X6] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X4,or(X5,X6)),or(X5,or(X4,X6)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r4) ).

fof(principia_modus_ponens,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_modus_ponens) ).

fof(principia_r4,axiom,
    r4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_r4) ).

fof(op_implies_or,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_or) ).

fof(principia_op_implies_or,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_op_implies_or) ).

fof(r5,axiom,
    ( r5
  <=> ! [X4,X5,X6] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X5,X6),implies(or(X4,X5),or(X4,X6)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r5) ).

fof(luka_cn1,conjecture,
    cn1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',luka_cn1) ).

fof(principia_r5,axiom,
    r5,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_r5) ).

fof(cn1,axiom,
    ( cn1
  <=> ! [X4,X5,X6] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,X5),implies(implies(X5,X6),implies(X4,X6)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',cn1) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ( ~ modus_ponens
        | ~ is_a_theorem(X7)
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X7,X8))
        | is_a_theorem(X8) )
      & ( is_a_theorem(esk1_0)
        | modus_ponens )
      & ( is_a_theorem(implies(esk1_0,esk2_0))
        | modus_ponens )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(esk2_0)
        | modus_ponens ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_ponens])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X105,X106,X107] :
      ( ( ~ r4
        | is_a_theorem(implies(or(X105,or(X106,X107)),or(X106,or(X105,X107)))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk50_0,or(esk51_0,esk52_0)),or(esk51_0,or(esk50_0,esk52_0))))
        | r4 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r4])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_modus_ponens]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3))))
    | ~ r4 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    r4,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r4]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X123,X124] :
      ( ~ op_implies_or
      | implies(X123,X124) = or(not(X123),X124) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_or])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_implies_or]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X111,X112,X113] :
      ( ( ~ r5
        | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X112,X113),implies(or(X111,X112),or(X111,X113)))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk54_0,esk55_0),implies(or(esk53_0,esk54_0),or(esk53_0,esk55_0))))
        | r5 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r5])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cn1,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[luka_cn1]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(or(X2,or(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2))))
    | ~ r5 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    r5,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r5]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X83,X84,X85] :
      ( ( ~ cn1
        | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X83,X84),implies(implies(X84,X85),implies(X83,X85)))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk39_0,esk40_0),implies(implies(esk40_0,esk41_0),implies(esk39_0,esk41_0))))
        | cn1 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cn1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cn1,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X3)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(or(X2,implies(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( cn1
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk39_0,esk40_0),implies(implies(esk40_0,esk41_0),implies(esk39_0,esk41_0)))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ cn1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,implies(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_24]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X3,X1),implies(X3,X2)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_24]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk39_0,esk40_0),implies(implies(esk40_0,esk41_0),implies(esk39_0,esk41_0)))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : LCL496+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jul  2 15:45:54 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.47  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.20/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.20/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 11.37/2.85  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 11.37/2.85  # No SInE strategy applied
% 11.37/2.85  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 11.37/2.85  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 11.37/2.85  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 11.37/2.85  #
% 11.37/2.85  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 11.37/2.85  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 11.37/2.85  
% 11.37/2.85  # Proof found!
% 11.37/2.85  # SZS status Theorem
% 11.37/2.85  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.37/2.85  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 11.37/2.85  
% 11.37/2.85  # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.37/2.85  # User time                : 0.416 s
% 11.37/2.85  # System time              : 0.017 s
% 11.37/2.85  # Total time               : 0.433 s
% 11.37/2.85  # Maximum resident set size: 7116 pages
% 11.37/2.85  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------