TSTP Solution File: LCL494+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LCL494+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:48:14 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 10.06s 3.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :  111
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  153 (  38 unt;  92 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   89 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   48 (  20   ~;  16   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (   6   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   34 (  32 usr;  32 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   60 (  60 usr;  55 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   73 (;  73   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ is_a_theorem > or > implies > equiv > and > #nlpp > not > substitution_of_equivalents > r5 > r4 > r3 > r2 > r1 > or_3 > or_2 > or_1 > op_or > op_implies_or > op_implies_and > op_equiv > op_and > modus_tollens > modus_ponens > kn3 > kn2 > kn1 > implies_3 > implies_2 > implies_1 > equivalence_3 > equivalence_2 > equivalence_1 > cn3 > cn2 > cn1 > and_3 > and_2 > and_1 > #skF_33 > #skF_41 > #skF_52 > #skF_49 > #skF_20 > #skF_18 > #skF_17 > #skF_11 > #skF_31 > #skF_15 > #skF_25 > #skF_55 > #skF_38 > #skF_36 > #skF_54 > #skF_43 > #skF_19 > #skF_40 > #skF_48 > #skF_7 > #skF_37 > #skF_10 > #skF_16 > #skF_47 > #skF_26 > #skF_53 > #skF_14 > #skF_51 > #skF_5 > #skF_45 > #skF_46 > #skF_39 > #skF_6 > #skF_13 > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1 > #skF_21 > #skF_9 > #skF_32 > #skF_50 > #skF_8 > #skF_30 > #skF_42 > #skF_4 > #skF_22 > #skF_29 > #skF_28 > #skF_35 > #skF_24 > #skF_27 > #skF_23 > #skF_44 > #skF_12 > #skF_34

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(implies_2,type,
    implies_2: $o ).

tff(r1,type,
    r1: $o ).

tff(equiv,type,
    equiv: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_33',type,
    '#skF_33': $i ).

tff('#skF_41',type,
    '#skF_41': $i ).

tff(r3,type,
    r3: $o ).

tff('#skF_52',type,
    '#skF_52': $i ).

tff(equivalence_2,type,
    equivalence_2: $o ).

tff('#skF_49',type,
    '#skF_49': $i ).

tff(and_2,type,
    and_2: $o ).

tff('#skF_20',type,
    '#skF_20': $i ).

tff(op_implies_or,type,
    op_implies_or: $o ).

tff('#skF_18',type,
    '#skF_18': $i ).

tff('#skF_17',type,
    '#skF_17': $i ).

tff(r5,type,
    r5: $o ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': $i ).

tff(kn3,type,
    kn3: $o ).

tff('#skF_31',type,
    '#skF_31': $i ).

tff('#skF_15',type,
    '#skF_15': $i ).

tff('#skF_25',type,
    '#skF_25': $i ).

tff(cn2,type,
    cn2: $o ).

tff('#skF_55',type,
    '#skF_55': $i ).

tff(r4,type,
    r4: $o ).

tff('#skF_38',type,
    '#skF_38': $i ).

tff('#skF_36',type,
    '#skF_36': $i ).

tff('#skF_54',type,
    '#skF_54': $i ).

tff('#skF_43',type,
    '#skF_43': $i ).

tff(op_and,type,
    op_and: $o ).

tff('#skF_19',type,
    '#skF_19': $i ).

tff('#skF_40',type,
    '#skF_40': $i ).

tff('#skF_48',type,
    '#skF_48': $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff('#skF_37',type,
    '#skF_37': $i ).

tff(and_3,type,
    and_3: $o ).

tff(is_a_theorem,type,
    is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).

tff(op_implies_and,type,
    op_implies_and: $o ).

tff(equivalence_1,type,
    equivalence_1: $o ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': $i ).

tff(kn2,type,
    kn2: $o ).

tff('#skF_16',type,
    '#skF_16': $i ).

tff(equivalence_3,type,
    equivalence_3: $o ).

tff(and_1,type,
    and_1: $o ).

tff('#skF_47',type,
    '#skF_47': $i ).

tff(cn1,type,
    cn1: $o ).

tff('#skF_26',type,
    '#skF_26': $i ).

tff('#skF_53',type,
    '#skF_53': $i ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': $i ).

tff('#skF_51',type,
    '#skF_51': $i ).

tff(or_1,type,
    or_1: $o ).

tff(implies_3,type,
    implies_3: $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff('#skF_45',type,
    '#skF_45': $i ).

tff('#skF_46',type,
    '#skF_46': $i ).

tff('#skF_39',type,
    '#skF_39': $i ).

tff(or,type,
    or: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(modus_tollens,type,
    modus_tollens: $o ).

tff(r2,type,
    r2: $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': $i ).

tff(not,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff(modus_ponens,type,
    modus_ponens: $o ).

tff(op_or,type,
    op_or: $o ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff(substitution_of_equivalents,type,
    substitution_of_equivalents: $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff('#skF_21',type,
    '#skF_21': $i ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i ).

tff('#skF_32',type,
    '#skF_32': $i ).

tff(op_equiv,type,
    op_equiv: $o ).

tff('#skF_50',type,
    '#skF_50': $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i ).

tff('#skF_30',type,
    '#skF_30': $i ).

tff('#skF_42',type,
    '#skF_42': $i ).

tff(or_3,type,
    or_3: $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff('#skF_22',type,
    '#skF_22': $i ).

tff(kn1,type,
    kn1: $o ).

tff('#skF_29',type,
    '#skF_29': $i ).

tff('#skF_28',type,
    '#skF_28': $i ).

tff('#skF_35',type,
    '#skF_35': $i ).

tff('#skF_24',type,
    '#skF_24': $i ).

tff('#skF_27',type,
    '#skF_27': $i ).

tff('#skF_23',type,
    '#skF_23': $i ).

tff(and,type,
    and: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(implies_1,type,
    implies_1: $o ).

tff('#skF_44',type,
    '#skF_44': $i ).

tff(implies,type,
    implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(cn3,type,
    cn3: $o ).

tff(or_2,type,
    or_2: $o ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': $i ).

tff('#skF_34',type,
    '#skF_34': $i ).

tff(f_263,axiom,
    op_equiv,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_equiv) ).

tff(f_214,axiom,
    ( op_equiv
   => ! [X,Y] : ( equiv(X,Y) = and(implies(X,Y),implies(Y,X)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_equiv) ).

tff(f_244,axiom,
    op_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_op_and) ).

tff(f_243,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_op_implies_or) ).

tff(f_210,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X,Y] : ( implies(X,Y) = or(not(X),Y) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_or) ).

tff(f_202,axiom,
    ( op_and
   => ! [X,Y] : ( and(X,Y) = not(or(not(X),not(Y))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_and) ).

tff(f_261,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_or) ).

tff(f_262,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

tff(f_206,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X,Y] : ( implies(X,Y) = not(and(X,not(Y))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).

tff(f_198,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X,Y] : ( or(X,Y) = not(and(not(X),not(Y))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_or) ).

tff(f_250,axiom,
    r2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_r2) ).

tff(f_155,axiom,
    ( r2
  <=> ! [P,Q] : is_a_theorem(implies(Q,or(P,Q))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r2) ).

tff(f_251,axiom,
    r3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_r3) ).

tff(f_159,axiom,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [P,Q] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,Q),or(Q,P))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r3) ).

tff(f_247,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax',principia_modus_ponens) ).

tff(f_60,axiom,
    ( modus_ponens
  <=> ! [X,Y] :
        ( ( is_a_theorem(X)
          & is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y)) )
       => is_a_theorem(Y) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens) ).

tff(f_92,axiom,
    ( and_2
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',and_2) ).

tff(f_265,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equivalence_2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hilbert_equivalence_2) ).

tff(f_116,axiom,
    ( equivalence_2
  <=> ! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X,Y),implies(Y,X))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',equivalence_2) ).

tff(c_146,plain,
    op_equiv,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_263]) ).

tff(c_120,plain,
    ! [X_64,Y_65] :
      ( ( and(implies(X_64,Y_65),implies(Y_65,X_64)) = equiv(X_64,Y_65) )
      | ~ op_equiv ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_214]) ).

tff(c_6616,plain,
    ! [X_474,Y_475] : ( and(implies(X_474,Y_475),implies(Y_475,X_474)) = equiv(X_474,Y_475) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_146,c_120]) ).

tff(c_124,plain,
    op_and,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_244]) ).

tff(c_122,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_243]) ).

tff(c_118,plain,
    ! [X_62,Y_63] :
      ( ( or(not(X_62),Y_63) = implies(X_62,Y_63) )
      | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_210]) ).

tff(c_153,plain,
    ! [X_62,Y_63] : ( or(not(X_62),Y_63) = implies(X_62,Y_63) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_122,c_118]) ).

tff(c_114,plain,
    ! [X_58,Y_59] :
      ( ( not(or(not(X_58),not(Y_59))) = and(X_58,Y_59) )
      | ~ op_and ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_202]) ).

tff(c_2549,plain,
    ! [X_245,Y_246] : ( not(implies(X_245,not(Y_246))) = and(X_245,Y_246) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_124,c_153,c_114]) ).

tff(c_142,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_261]) ).

tff(c_144,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_262]) ).

tff(c_116,plain,
    ! [X_60,Y_61] :
      ( ( not(and(X_60,not(Y_61))) = implies(X_60,Y_61) )
      | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_206]) ).

tff(c_155,plain,
    ! [X_60,Y_61] : ( not(and(X_60,not(Y_61))) = implies(X_60,Y_61) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_144,c_116]) ).

tff(c_112,plain,
    ! [X_56,Y_57] :
      ( ( not(and(not(X_56),not(Y_57))) = or(X_56,Y_57) )
      | ~ op_or ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_198]) ).

tff(c_159,plain,
    ! [X_56,Y_57] : ( implies(not(X_56),Y_57) = or(X_56,Y_57) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_142,c_155,c_112]) ).

tff(c_2570,plain,
    ! [X_245,Y_246,Y_57] : ( or(implies(X_245,not(Y_246)),Y_57) = implies(and(X_245,Y_246),Y_57) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2549,c_159]) ).

tff(c_2471,plain,
    ! [X_235,Y_236] : ( or(not(X_235),Y_236) = implies(X_235,Y_236) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_122,c_118]) ).

tff(c_132,plain,
    r2,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_250]) ).

tff(c_98,plain,
    ! [Q_47,P_46] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(Q_47,or(P_46,Q_47)))
      | ~ r2 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_155]) ).

tff(c_173,plain,
    ! [Q_47,P_46] : is_a_theorem(implies(Q_47,or(P_46,Q_47))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_132,c_98]) ).

tff(c_2488,plain,
    ! [Y_237,X_238] : is_a_theorem(implies(Y_237,implies(X_238,Y_237))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2471,c_173]) ).

tff(c_2495,plain,
    ! [X_56,X_238] : is_a_theorem(or(X_56,implies(X_238,not(X_56)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_159,c_2488]) ).

tff(c_134,plain,
    r3,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_251]) ).

tff(c_102,plain,
    ! [P_48,Q_49] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(P_48,Q_49),or(Q_49,P_48)))
      | ~ r3 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_159]) ).

tff(c_2654,plain,
    ! [P_255,Q_256] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(P_255,Q_256),or(Q_256,P_255))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_134,c_102]) ).

tff(c_128,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_247]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [Y_2,X_1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(Y_2)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_1,Y_2))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X_1)
      | ~ modus_ponens ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_60]) ).

tff(c_201,plain,
    ! [Y_2,X_1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(Y_2)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_1,Y_2))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X_1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_128,c_2]) ).

tff(c_2741,plain,
    ! [Q_259,P_260] :
      ( is_a_theorem(or(Q_259,P_260))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(or(P_260,Q_259)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2654,c_201]) ).

tff(c_2754,plain,
    ! [X_238,X_56] : is_a_theorem(or(implies(X_238,not(X_56)),X_56)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2495,c_2741]) ).

tff(c_5872,plain,
    ! [X_238,X_56] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X_238,X_56),X_56)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2570,c_2754]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    ( and_2
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and('#skF_16','#skF_17'),'#skF_17')) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_92]) ).

tff(c_207,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and('#skF_16','#skF_17'),'#skF_17')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_36]) ).

tff(c_6081,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_5872,c_207]) ).

tff(c_6082,plain,
    and_2,
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_36]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    ! [X_16,Y_17] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(and(X_16,Y_17),Y_17))
      | ~ and_2 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_92]) ).

tff(c_6100,plain,
    ! [X_16,Y_17] : is_a_theorem(implies(and(X_16,Y_17),Y_17)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6082,c_38]) ).

tff(c_6625,plain,
    ! [X_474,Y_475] : is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X_474,Y_475),implies(Y_475,X_474))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6616,c_6100]) ).

tff(c_148,plain,
    ~ equivalence_2,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_265]) ).

tff(c_60,plain,
    ( equivalence_2
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv('#skF_29','#skF_30'),implies('#skF_30','#skF_29'))) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_116]) ).

tff(c_187,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv('#skF_29','#skF_30'),implies('#skF_30','#skF_29'))),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_148,c_60]) ).

tff(c_6650,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6625,c_187]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : LCL494+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 14:23:46 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 10.06/3.38  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.06/3.39  
% 10.06/3.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 10.30/3.43  
% 10.30/3.43  Inference rules
% 10.30/3.43  ----------------------
% 10.30/3.43  #Ref     : 0
% 10.30/3.43  #Sup     : 1580
% 10.30/3.43  #Fact    : 0
% 10.30/3.43  #Define  : 0
% 10.30/3.43  #Split   : 77
% 10.30/3.43  #Chain   : 0
% 10.30/3.43  #Close   : 0
% 10.30/3.43  
% 10.30/3.43  Ordering : KBO
% 10.30/3.43  
% 10.30/3.43  Simplification rules
% 10.30/3.43  ----------------------
% 10.30/3.43  #Subsume      : 187
% 10.30/3.43  #Demod        : 483
% 10.30/3.43  #Tautology    : 242
% 10.30/3.43  #SimpNegUnit  : 25
% 10.30/3.43  #BackRed      : 17
% 10.30/3.43  
% 10.30/3.43  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 10.30/3.43  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 10.30/3.43  
% 10.30/3.43  Timing (in seconds)
% 10.30/3.43  ----------------------
% 10.30/3.43  Preprocessing        : 0.65
% 10.30/3.43  Parsing              : 0.34
% 10.30/3.43  CNF conversion       : 0.05
% 10.30/3.43  Main loop            : 1.69
% 10.30/3.43  Inferencing          : 0.56
% 10.30/3.43  Reduction            : 0.59
% 10.30/3.44  Demodulation         : 0.40
% 10.30/3.44  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 10.30/3.44  Subsumption          : 0.34
% 10.30/3.44  Abstraction          : 0.05
% 10.30/3.44  MUC search           : 0.00
% 10.30/3.44  Cooper               : 0.00
% 10.30/3.44  Total                : 2.40
% 10.30/3.44  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 10.30/3.44  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 10.30/3.44  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 10.30/3.44  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------