TSTP Solution File: LCL493+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : LCL493+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 09:26:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.05s 2.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   20
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   62 (  36 unt;   0 nHn;  31 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   95 (  16 equ;  36 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  11 usr;  11 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   84 (   7 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_38,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_38) ).

cnf(i_0_52,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_52) ).

cnf(i_0_70,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2))))
    | ~ r5 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_70) ).

cnf(i_0_60,plain,
    r5,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_60) ).

cnf(i_0_44,plain,
    ( or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_44) ).

cnf(i_0_55,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_55) ).

cnf(i_0_64,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1)))
    | ~ r2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_64) ).

cnf(i_0_57,plain,
    r2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_57) ).

cnf(i_0_66,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1)))
    | ~ r3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_66) ).

cnf(i_0_58,plain,
    r3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_58) ).

cnf(i_0_43,plain,
    ( not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_43) ).

cnf(i_0_21,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_21) ).

cnf(i_0_45,plain,
    ( not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) = or(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_or ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_45) ).

cnf(i_0_22,plain,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_22) ).

cnf(i_0_41,plain,
    ( not(or(not(X1),not(X2))) = and(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_and ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_41) ).

cnf(i_0_53,plain,
    op_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_53) ).

cnf(i_0_42,plain,
    ( and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) = equiv(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_equiv ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_42) ).

cnf(i_0_54,plain,
    op_equiv,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_54) ).

cnf(i_0_13,plain,
    ( equivalence_1
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(esk13_0,esk14_0),implies(esk13_0,esk14_0))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_13) ).

cnf(i_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equivalence_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xu1eqdyh/lgb.p',i_0_19) ).

cnf(c_0_91,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1)) ),
    i_0_38 ).

cnf(c_0_92,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    i_0_52 ).

cnf(c_0_93,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2))))
    | ~ r5 ),
    i_0_70 ).

cnf(c_0_94,plain,
    r5,
    i_0_60 ).

cnf(c_0_95,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_92])]) ).

cnf(c_0_96,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_94])]) ).

cnf(c_0_97,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X1,X3)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_96]) ).

cnf(c_0_98,plain,
    ( or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    i_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_99,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    i_0_55 ).

cnf(c_0_100,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(or(X1,X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_97]) ).

cnf(c_0_101,plain,
    or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_98,c_0_99])]) ).

cnf(c_0_102,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1)))
    | ~ r2 ),
    i_0_64 ).

cnf(c_0_103,plain,
    r2,
    i_0_57 ).

cnf(c_0_104,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1)))
    | ~ r3 ),
    i_0_66 ).

cnf(c_0_105,plain,
    r3,
    i_0_58 ).

cnf(c_0_106,plain,
    ( not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    i_0_43 ).

cnf(c_0_107,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    i_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_108,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X3))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_100,c_0_101]),c_0_101]) ).

cnf(c_0_109,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_102,c_0_103])]) ).

cnf(c_0_110,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_104,c_0_105])]) ).

cnf(c_0_111,plain,
    ( not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) = or(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_or ),
    i_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_112,plain,
    not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_106,c_0_107])]) ).

cnf(c_0_113,plain,
    op_or,
    i_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_114,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(X3,X1),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_108,c_0_109]) ).

cnf(c_0_115,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_110,c_0_101]) ).

cnf(c_0_116,plain,
    implies(not(X1),X2) = or(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_111,c_0_112]),c_0_113])]) ).

cnf(c_0_117,plain,
    ( not(or(not(X1),not(X2))) = and(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_and ),
    i_0_41 ).

cnf(c_0_118,plain,
    op_and,
    i_0_53 ).

cnf(c_0_119,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(or(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_110]) ).

cnf(c_0_120,plain,
    is_a_theorem(or(X1,implies(X1,X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_114,c_0_115]),c_0_116]) ).

cnf(c_0_121,plain,
    not(implies(X1,not(X2))) = and(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_117,c_0_101]),c_0_118])]) ).

cnf(c_0_122,plain,
    is_a_theorem(or(implies(X1,X2),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_119,c_0_120]) ).

cnf(c_0_123,plain,
    or(implies(X1,not(X2)),X3) = implies(and(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_116,c_0_121]) ).

cnf(c_0_124,plain,
    ( and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) = equiv(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_equiv ),
    i_0_42 ).

cnf(c_0_125,plain,
    op_equiv,
    i_0_54 ).

cnf(c_0_126,plain,
    ( equivalence_1
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(esk13_0,esk14_0),implies(esk13_0,esk14_0))) ),
    i_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_127,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equivalence_1,
    i_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_128,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_122,c_0_123]) ).

cnf(c_0_129,plain,
    and(implies(X1,X2),implies(X2,X1)) = equiv(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_124,c_0_125])]) ).

cnf(c_0_130,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(esk13_0,esk14_0),implies(esk13_0,esk14_0))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_126,c_0_127]) ).

cnf(c_0_131,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X1,X2),implies(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_128,c_0_129]) ).

cnf(c_0_132,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_130,c_0_131])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : LCL493+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jul  2 15:13:54 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.47  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.20/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.20/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.05/2.58  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.05/2.58  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.05/2.58  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.05/2.58  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 8.05/2.58  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.05/2.58  #
% 8.05/2.58  # Preprocessing time       : 0.026 s
% 8.05/2.58  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.05/2.58  
% 8.05/2.58  # Proof found!
% 8.05/2.58  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.05/2.58  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.05/2.58  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.05/2.58  
% 8.05/2.58  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.05/2.58  # User time                : 0.143 s
% 8.05/2.58  # System time              : 0.014 s
% 8.05/2.58  # Total time               : 0.156 s
% 8.05/2.58  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.05/2.58  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------