TSTP Solution File: LCL491+1 by Duper---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Duper---1.0
% Problem : LCL491+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : duper %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 07:09:57 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.56s 3.89s
% Output : Proof 3.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LCL491+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : duper %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 18:47:29 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 3.56/3.89 SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.56/3.89 SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #10 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Iff or_2 (∀ (X Y : Iota), is_a_theorem (implies Y (or X Y)))) True
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #22 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Iff r2 (∀ (P Q : Iota), is_a_theorem (implies Q (or P Q)))) True
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #36 (by assumption #[]): Eq r2 True
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #43 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not or_2) True
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #64 (by clausification #[43]): Eq or_2 False
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #104 (by clausification #[10]): Or (Eq or_2 True) (Eq (∀ (X Y : Iota), is_a_theorem (implies Y (or X Y))) False)
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #106 (by clausification #[104]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq or_2 True) (Eq (Not (∀ (Y : Iota), is_a_theorem (implies Y (or (skS.0 10 a) Y)))) True)
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #107 (by clausification #[106]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq or_2 True) (Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), is_a_theorem (implies Y (or (skS.0 10 a) Y))) False)
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #108 (by clausification #[107]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.56/3.89 Or (Eq or_2 True) (Eq (Not (is_a_theorem (implies (skS.0 11 a a_1) (or (skS.0 10 a) (skS.0 11 a a_1))))) True)
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #109 (by clausification #[108]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.56/3.89 Or (Eq or_2 True) (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies (skS.0 11 a a_1) (or (skS.0 10 a) (skS.0 11 a a_1)))) False)
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #110 (by forward demodulation #[109, 64]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.56/3.89 Or (Eq False True) (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies (skS.0 11 a a_1) (or (skS.0 10 a) (skS.0 11 a a_1)))) False)
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #111 (by clausification #[110]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (is_a_theorem (implies (skS.0 11 a a_1) (or (skS.0 10 a) (skS.0 11 a a_1)))) False
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #124 (by clausification #[22]): Or (Eq r2 False) (Eq (∀ (P Q : Iota), is_a_theorem (implies Q (or P Q))) True)
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #136 (by clausification #[124]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq r2 False) (Eq (∀ (Q : Iota), is_a_theorem (implies Q (or a Q))) True)
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #137 (by clausification #[136]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq r2 False) (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies a (or a_1 a))) True)
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #138 (by forward demodulation #[137, 36]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (is_a_theorem (implies a (or a_1 a))) True)
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #139 (by clausification #[138]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (is_a_theorem (implies a (or a_1 a))) True
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #140 (by superposition #[139, 111]): Eq True False
% 3.56/3.89 Clause #142 (by clausification #[140]): False
% 3.56/3.89 SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------