TSTP Solution File: LCL488+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : LCL488+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 09:26:22 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 4.35s 2.11s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   46 (  28 unt;   0 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   69 (  13 equ;  26 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   9 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_64,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1)))
    | ~ r2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0s7sv4ny/input.p',i_0_64) ).

cnf(i_0_57,plain,
    r2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0s7sv4ny/input.p',i_0_57) ).

cnf(i_0_44,plain,
    ( or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0s7sv4ny/input.p',i_0_44) ).

cnf(i_0_55,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0s7sv4ny/input.p',i_0_55) ).

cnf(i_0_43,plain,
    ( not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0s7sv4ny/input.p',i_0_43) ).

cnf(i_0_21,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0s7sv4ny/input.p',i_0_21) ).

cnf(i_0_38,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0s7sv4ny/input.p',i_0_38) ).

cnf(i_0_52,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0s7sv4ny/input.p',i_0_52) ).

cnf(i_0_66,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1)))
    | ~ r3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0s7sv4ny/input.p',i_0_66) ).

cnf(i_0_58,plain,
    r3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0s7sv4ny/input.p',i_0_58) ).

cnf(i_0_45,plain,
    ( not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) = or(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_or ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0s7sv4ny/input.p',i_0_45) ).

cnf(i_0_22,plain,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0s7sv4ny/input.p',i_0_22) ).

cnf(i_0_41,plain,
    ( not(or(not(X1),not(X2))) = and(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_and ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0s7sv4ny/input.p',i_0_41) ).

cnf(i_0_53,plain,
    op_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0s7sv4ny/input.p',i_0_53) ).

cnf(i_0_3,plain,
    ( and_2
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk4_0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0s7sv4ny/input.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ and_2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0s7sv4ny/input.p',i_0_19) ).

cnf(c_0_83,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1)))
    | ~ r2 ),
    i_0_64 ).

cnf(c_0_84,plain,
    r2,
    i_0_57 ).

cnf(c_0_85,plain,
    ( or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    i_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_86,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    i_0_55 ).

cnf(c_0_87,plain,
    ( not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    i_0_43 ).

cnf(c_0_88,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    i_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_89,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1)) ),
    i_0_38 ).

cnf(c_0_90,plain,
    modus_ponens,
    i_0_52 ).

cnf(c_0_91,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1)))
    | ~ r3 ),
    i_0_66 ).

cnf(c_0_92,plain,
    r3,
    i_0_58 ).

cnf(c_0_93,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_84])]) ).

cnf(c_0_94,plain,
    or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_86])]) ).

cnf(c_0_95,plain,
    ( not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) = or(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_or ),
    i_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_96,plain,
    not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_88])]) ).

cnf(c_0_97,plain,
    op_or,
    i_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_98,plain,
    ( not(or(not(X1),not(X2))) = and(X1,X2)
    | ~ op_and ),
    i_0_41 ).

cnf(c_0_99,plain,
    op_and,
    i_0_53 ).

cnf(c_0_100,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_90])]) ).

cnf(c_0_101,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_92])]) ).

cnf(c_0_102,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_94]) ).

cnf(c_0_103,plain,
    implies(not(X1),X2) = or(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_96]),c_0_97])]) ).

cnf(c_0_104,plain,
    not(implies(X1,not(X2))) = and(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_98,c_0_94]),c_0_99])]) ).

cnf(c_0_105,plain,
    ( and_2
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk4_0)) ),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_106,negated_conjecture,
    ~ and_2,
    i_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_107,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(or(X1,X2))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(or(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_100,c_0_101]) ).

cnf(c_0_108,plain,
    is_a_theorem(or(X1,implies(X2,not(X1)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_102,c_0_103]) ).

cnf(c_0_109,plain,
    or(implies(X1,not(X2)),X3) = implies(and(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_103,c_0_104]) ).

cnf(c_0_110,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(and(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk4_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_105,c_0_106]) ).

cnf(c_0_111,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(and(X1,X2),X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_108]),c_0_109]) ).

cnf(c_0_112,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_110,c_0_111])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11  % Problem  : LCL488+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.02/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 04:54:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.44  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.44  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.18/0.44  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.18/0.44  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 4.35/2.11  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 4.35/2.11  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 4.35/2.11  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 4.35/2.11  
% 4.35/2.11  # Proof found!
% 4.35/2.11  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.35/2.11  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.35/2.11  # Proof object total steps             : 46
% 4.35/2.11  # Proof object clause steps            : 30
% 4.35/2.11  # Proof object formula steps           : 16
% 4.35/2.11  # Proof object conjectures             : 2
% 4.35/2.11  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 4.35/2.11  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 1
% 4.35/2.11  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 16
% 4.35/2.11  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 16
% 4.35/2.11  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 4.35/2.11  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 20
% 4.35/2.11  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.35/2.11  # Parsed axioms                        : 74
% 4.35/2.11  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 4.35/2.11  # Initial clauses                      : 74
% 4.35/2.11  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 4.35/2.11  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 74
% 4.35/2.11  # Processed clauses                    : 346
% 4.35/2.11  # ...of these trivial                  : 15
% 4.35/2.11  # ...subsumed                          : 92
% 4.35/2.11  # ...remaining for further processing  : 239
% 4.35/2.11  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 4.35/2.11  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 4.35/2.11  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 4.35/2.11  # Backward-rewritten                   : 14
% 4.35/2.11  # Generated clauses                    : 1332
% 4.35/2.11  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1211
% 4.35/2.11  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 6
% 4.35/2.11  # Paramodulations                      : 1332
% 4.35/2.11  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 4.35/2.11  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 4.35/2.11  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 4.35/2.11  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 4.35/2.11  # Current number of processed clauses  : 223
% 4.35/2.11  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 49
% 4.35/2.11  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 4.35/2.11  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 4.35/2.11  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 172
% 4.35/2.11  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 903
% 4.35/2.11  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1733
% 4.35/2.11  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 4.35/2.11  # Current number of archived clauses   : 16
% 4.35/2.11  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6323
% 4.35/2.11  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6221
% 4.35/2.11  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 96
% 4.35/2.11  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 285
% 4.35/2.11  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 4.35/2.11  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 76
% 4.35/2.11  # BW rewrite match successes           : 13
% 4.35/2.11  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 4.35/2.11  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 4.35/2.11  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 18488
% 4.35/2.11  
% 4.35/2.11  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.35/2.11  # User time                : 0.029 s
% 4.35/2.11  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 4.35/2.11  # Total time               : 0.031 s
% 4.35/2.11  # ...preprocessing         : 0.012 s
% 4.35/2.11  # ...main loop             : 0.019 s
% 4.35/2.11  # Maximum resident set size: 7136 pages
% 4.35/2.11  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------