TSTP Solution File: LCL460+1 by PyRes---1.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.3
% Problem : LCL460+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 13:54:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.49s 0.68s
% Output : Refutation 0.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL460+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 01:05:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.49/0.68 # Version: 1.3
% 0.49/0.68 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.49/0.68 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.49/0.68 fof(rosser_kn2,conjecture,kn2,input).
% 0.49/0.68 fof(c6,negated_conjecture,(~kn2),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[rosser_kn2])).
% 0.49/0.68 fof(c7,negated_conjecture,~kn2,inference(fof_simplification,status(thm),[c6])).
% 0.49/0.68 cnf(c8,negated_conjecture,~kn2,inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c7])).
% 0.49/0.68 fof(hilbert_and_1,axiom,and_1,input).
% 0.49/0.68 cnf(c21,axiom,and_1,inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[hilbert_and_1])).
% 0.49/0.68 fof(and_1,axiom,(and_1<=>(![X]:(![Y]:is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),X))))),input).
% 0.49/0.68 fof(c164,axiom,((~and_1|(![X]:(![Y]:is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),X)))))&((?[X]:(?[Y]:~is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),X))))|and_1)),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[and_1])).
% 0.49/0.68 fof(c165,axiom,((~and_1|(![X92]:(![X93]:is_a_theorem(implies(and(X92,X93),X92)))))&((?[X94]:(?[X95]:~is_a_theorem(implies(and(X94,X95),X94))))|and_1)),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c164])).
% 0.49/0.68 fof(c167,axiom,(![X92]:(![X93]:((~and_1|is_a_theorem(implies(and(X92,X93),X92)))&(~is_a_theorem(implies(and(skolem0041,skolem0042),skolem0041))|and_1)))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c166,axiom,((~and_1|(![X92]:(![X93]:is_a_theorem(implies(and(X92,X93),X92)))))&(~is_a_theorem(implies(and(skolem0041,skolem0042),skolem0041))|and_1)),inference(skolemize,status(esa),[c165])).])).
% 0.49/0.68 cnf(c168,axiom,~and_1|is_a_theorem(implies(and(X172,X171),X172)),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c167])).
% 0.49/0.68 cnf(c222,plain,is_a_theorem(implies(and(X174,X173),X174)),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c168, c21])).
% 0.49/0.68 fof(kn2,axiom,(kn2<=>(![P]:(![Q]:is_a_theorem(implies(and(P,Q),P))))),input).
% 0.49/0.68 fof(c104,axiom,((~kn2|(![P]:(![Q]:is_a_theorem(implies(and(P,Q),P)))))&((?[P]:(?[Q]:~is_a_theorem(implies(and(P,Q),P))))|kn2)),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[kn2])).
% 0.49/0.68 fof(c105,axiom,((~kn2|(![X52]:(![X53]:is_a_theorem(implies(and(X52,X53),X52)))))&((?[X54]:(?[X55]:~is_a_theorem(implies(and(X54,X55),X54))))|kn2)),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c104])).
% 0.49/0.68 fof(c107,axiom,(![X52]:(![X53]:((~kn2|is_a_theorem(implies(and(X52,X53),X52)))&(~is_a_theorem(implies(and(skolem0021,skolem0022),skolem0021))|kn2)))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c106,axiom,((~kn2|(![X52]:(![X53]:is_a_theorem(implies(and(X52,X53),X52)))))&(~is_a_theorem(implies(and(skolem0021,skolem0022),skolem0021))|kn2)),inference(skolemize,status(esa),[c105])).])).
% 0.49/0.68 cnf(c109,axiom,~is_a_theorem(implies(and(skolem0021,skolem0022),skolem0021))|kn2,inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c107])).
% 0.49/0.68 cnf(c227,plain,kn2,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c109, c222])).
% 0.49/0.68 cnf(c228,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c227, c8])).
% 0.49/0.68 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.49/0.68
% 0.49/0.68 # Initial clauses : 91
% 0.49/0.68 # Processed clauses : 54
% 0.49/0.68 # Factors computed : 0
% 0.49/0.68 # Resolvents computed: 18
% 0.49/0.68 # Tautologies deleted: 2
% 0.49/0.68 # Forward subsumed : 11
% 0.49/0.68 # Backward subsumed : 8
% 0.49/0.68 # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.49/0.68 # User time : 0.324 s
% 0.49/0.68 # System time : 0.014 s
% 0.49/0.68 # Total time : 0.338 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------