TSTP Solution File: LCL456+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : LCL456+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:23:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.45s 0.63s
% Output   : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   43 (  32 unt;   0 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   58 (  14 equ;  20 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  10 usr;  10 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   9 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ modus_ponens
    | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
    | is_a_theorem(Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_ponens) ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ modus_tollens
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X),not(Y)),implies(Y,X))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',modus_tollens) ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( ~ implies_1
    | is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',implies_1) ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    ( ~ and_2
    | is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',and_2) ).

cnf(51,axiom,
    ( r3
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or('SKOLEMAAAU48','SKOLEMAAAU49'),or('SKOLEMAAAU49','SKOLEMAAAU48'))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax',r3) ).

cnf(56,axiom,
    ( ~ op_or
    | or(X,Y) = not(and(not(X),not(Y))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_or) ).

cnf(57,axiom,
    ( ~ op_and
    | and(X,Y) = not(or(not(X),not(Y))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_and) ).

cnf(58,axiom,
    ( ~ op_implies_and
    | implies(X,Y) = not(and(X,not(Y))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_and) ).

cnf(59,axiom,
    ( ~ op_implies_or
    | implies(X,Y) = or(not(X),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax',op_implies_or) ).

cnf(61,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_op_or) ).

cnf(62,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

cnf(64,axiom,
    modus_ponens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_modus_ponens) ).

cnf(65,axiom,
    modus_tollens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_modus_tollens) ).

cnf(66,axiom,
    implies_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_implies_1) ).

cnf(70,axiom,
    and_2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+2.ax',hilbert_and_2) ).

cnf(79,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_op_implies_or) ).

cnf(80,axiom,
    op_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_op_and) ).

cnf(81,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',principia_r3) ).

cnf(82,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or('SKOLEMAAAU48','SKOLEMAAAU49'),or('SKOLEMAAAU49','SKOLEMAAAU48'))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[51,81]) ).

cnf(83,plain,
    and(X,Y) = not(or(not(X),not(Y))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[57,80]) ).

cnf(84,plain,
    implies(X,Y) = or(not(X),Y),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[59,79]) ).

cnf(85,plain,
    and(X,Y) = not(implies(X,not(Y))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[83,84,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(95,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),Y)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[18,70]) ).

cnf(101,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[10,66]) ).

cnf(102,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X),not(Y)),implies(Y,X))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[8,65]) ).

cnf(103,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
    | is_a_theorem(Y) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1,64]) ).

cnf(105,plain,
    implies(X,Y) = not(and(X,not(Y))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[58,62]) ).

cnf(106,plain,
    and(X,Y) = not(not(and(X,not(not(Y))))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[85,105,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(114,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(not(and(or('SKOLEMAAAU48','SKOLEMAAAU49'),not(or('SKOLEMAAAU49','SKOLEMAAAU48'))))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[82,105,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(115,plain,
    is_a_theorem(not(and(and(X,Y),not(Y)))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[95,105,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(117,plain,
    is_a_theorem(not(and(X,not(not(and(Y,not(X))))))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[101,105,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(118,plain,
    is_a_theorem(not(and(not(and(not(X),not(not(Y)))),not(not(and(Y,not(X))))))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[102,105,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(125,plain,
    not(and(X,not(Y))) = or(not(X),Y),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[84,105,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(131,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(not(and(X,not(Y))))
    | is_a_theorem(Y) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[103,105,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(139,plain,
    or(X,Y) = not(and(not(X),not(Y))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[56,61]) ).

cnf(140,plain,
    not(and(X,not(Y))) = not(and(not(not(X)),not(Y))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[125,139,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(148,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(not(and(not(and(not('SKOLEMAAAU48'),not('SKOLEMAAAU49'))),not(not(and(not('SKOLEMAAAU49'),not('SKOLEMAAAU48'))))))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[114,139,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(162,plain,
    and(not(not(X)),Y) = and(X,Y),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[106,140,theory(equality)]),106,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(187,plain,
    is_a_theorem(not(and(X,and(not(and(not(Y),not(not(Z)))),and(Z,not(Y)))))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[131,118,117]),106,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(196,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(not(and(not(and(and(X,Y),not(Y))),and(not(and(not('SKOLEMAAAU48'),not('SKOLEMAAAU49'))),and(not('SKOLEMAAAU49'),not('SKOLEMAAAU48')))))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[131,148,115]),106,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(454,plain,
    and(not(and(X,Y)),Z) = and(not(and(X,not(not(Y)))),Z),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[162,106,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(539,plain,
    is_a_theorem(not(and(X,and(not(and(not(Y),Z)),and(Z,not(Y)))))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[187,454,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(540,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[196,539]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : LCL456+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 19:13:59 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T19:14:00
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n013.cluster.edu at 2022-07-03T19:14:00
% 0.45/0.63  
% 0.45/0.63  
% 0.45/0.63  #||
% 0.45/0.63  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/0.63  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.47/0.64  ||#
% 0.47/0.64  
% 0.47/0.64  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.47/0.64  ;       727 formulas have been input or derived (from 75 formulas).
% 0.47/0.64  ;       540 (74%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.47/0.64  ;          226 (42%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.47/0.64  ;          314 (58%) are still being kept.
% 0.47/0.64  ; 
% 0.47/0.64  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.009   6%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.004   3%   Assert                       (53 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.051  33%   Process new row              (652 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.011   7%   Resolution                   (148 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.003   2%   Paramodulation               (74 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (90 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.004   3%   Forward subsumption          (90 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.001   1%   Backward subsumption         (90 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (5 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.023  15%   Forward simplification       (640 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.016  10%   Backward simplification      (540 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.002   1%   Ordering                     (91 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.001   1%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.030  19%   Other
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.155        Total
% 0.47/0.64  ;     0.169        Real time
% 0.47/0.64  ; 
% 0.47/0.64  ; Term-hash-array has 1,819 terms in all.
% 0.47/0.64  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 14 entries (60 at peak, 90 added, 76 deleted).
% 0.47/0.64  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 142 nodes (403 at peak, 679 added, 537 deleted).
% 0.47/0.64  ;  Retrieved 18 possibly forward subsuming rows in 90 calls.
% 0.47/0.64  ;  Retrieved 11 possibly backward subsumed rows in 90 calls.
% 0.47/0.64  ; Path-index has 1,146 entries (1,294 at peak, 2,056 added, 910 deleted).
% 0.47/0.64  ; Path-index has 2,226 nodes (2,238 at peak, 3,254 added, 1,028 deleted).
% 0.47/0.64  ; Trie-index has 1,146 entries (1,294 at peak, 2,056 added, 910 deleted).
% 0.47/0.64  ; Trie-index has 3,498 nodes (4,386 at peak, 7,041 added, 3,543 deleted).
% 0.47/0.64  ; Retrieved 1,305 generalization terms in 5,593 calls.
% 0.47/0.64  ; Retrieved 898 instance terms in 449 calls.
% 0.47/0.64  ; Retrieved 4,871 unifiable terms in 755 calls.
% 0.47/0.64  ; 
% 0.47/0.64  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 27 entries:
% 0.47/0.64  ;    27 with value 0
% 0.47/0.64  ; The agenda of rows to process has 16 entries:
% 0.47/0.64  ;     2 with value 24              1 with value 30               1 with value 34
% 0.47/0.64  ;     3 with value 26              3 with value 31               2 with value 37
% 0.47/0.64  ;     3 with value 29              1 with value 33
% 0.47/0.64  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 3 entries:
% 0.47/0.64  ;     1 with value 23              2 with value 28
% 0.47/0.64  ; The agenda of rows to give has 243 entries:
% 0.47/0.64  ;     4 with value (4 14)         18 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 35)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     1 with value (4 15)         13 with value (4 26)          11 with value (4 36)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     4 with value (4 16)         27 with value (4 27)           5 with value (4 37)
% 0.47/0.64  ;    21 with value (4 17)         15 with value (4 28)           1 with value (4 38)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     4 with value (4 18)         10 with value (4 29)           1 with value (4 39)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     6 with value (4 19)          3 with value (4 30)          10 with value (4 40)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     7 with value (4 20)          9 with value (4 31)           1 with value (4 42)
% 0.47/0.64  ;    10 with value (4 21)          1 with value (4 32)           5 with value (4 43)
% 0.47/0.64  ;    10 with value (4 22)          6 with value (4 33)           1 with value (4 44)
% 0.47/0.64  ;     7 with value (4 23)          3 with value (4 34)           8 with value (4 46)
% 0.47/0.64  ;    20 with value (4 24)
% 0.47/0.64  Evaluation took:
% 0.47/0.64    0.17 seconds of real time
% 0.47/0.64    0.162605 seconds of user run time
% 0.47/0.64    0.006897 seconds of system run time
% 0.47/0.64    [Run times include 0.012 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.47/0.64    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.47/0.64    0 page faults and
% 0.47/0.64    14,680,224 bytes consed.
% 0.47/0.64  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.64  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-03T19:14:00
% 0.47/0.64  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.64  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------