TSTP Solution File: LCL456+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : LCL456+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:12:49 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  25 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   65 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  17   ~;  14   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   7 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (   0 sgn;  24   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(op_implies_or,axiom,
    ( op_implies_or
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8Xs2XazSsH/E---3.1_15363.p',op_implies_or) ).

fof(op_implies_and,axiom,
    ( op_implies_and
   => ! [X1,X2] : implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8Xs2XazSsH/E---3.1_15363.p',op_implies_and) ).

fof(op_and,axiom,
    ( op_and
   => ! [X1,X2] : and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8Xs2XazSsH/E---3.1_15363.p',op_and) ).

fof(principia_op_implies_or,axiom,
    op_implies_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8Xs2XazSsH/E---3.1_15363.p',principia_op_implies_or) ).

fof(op_or,axiom,
    ( op_or
   => ! [X1,X2] : or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8Xs2XazSsH/E---3.1_15363.p',op_or) ).

fof(hilbert_op_implies_and,axiom,
    op_implies_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8Xs2XazSsH/E---3.1_15363.p',hilbert_op_implies_and) ).

fof(principia_op_and,axiom,
    op_and,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8Xs2XazSsH/E---3.1_15363.p',principia_op_and) ).

fof(hilbert_op_or,axiom,
    op_or,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8Xs2XazSsH/E---3.1_15363.p',hilbert_op_or) ).

fof(modus_tollens,axiom,
    ( modus_tollens
  <=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X2),not(X1)),implies(X1,X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8Xs2XazSsH/E---3.1_15363.p',modus_tollens) ).

fof(hilbert_modus_tollens,axiom,
    modus_tollens,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8Xs2XazSsH/E---3.1_15363.p',hilbert_modus_tollens) ).

fof(r3,axiom,
    ( r3
  <=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(or(X4,X5),or(X5,X4))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8Xs2XazSsH/E---3.1_15363.p',r3) ).

fof(principia_r3,conjecture,
    r3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8Xs2XazSsH/E---3.1_15363.p',principia_r3) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X123,X124] :
      ( ~ op_implies_or
      | implies(X123,X124) = or(not(X123),X124) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_or])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X121,X122] :
      ( ~ op_implies_and
      | implies(X121,X122) = not(and(X121,not(X122))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_and])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X119,X120] :
      ( ~ op_and
      | and(X119,X120) = not(or(not(X119),not(X120))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_and])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2)
    | ~ op_implies_or ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    op_implies_or,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_implies_or]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X117,X118] :
      ( ~ op_or
      | or(X117,X118) = not(and(not(X117),not(X118))) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_or])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( implies(X1,X2) = not(and(X1,not(X2)))
    | ~ op_implies_and ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    op_implies_and,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_implies_and]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2)))
    | ~ op_and ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    or(not(X1),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    op_and,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_and]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( or(X1,X2) = not(and(not(X1),not(X2)))
    | ~ op_or ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    not(and(X1,not(X2))) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    op_or,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_op_or]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X15,X16] :
      ( ( ~ modus_tollens
        | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X16),not(X15)),implies(X15,X16))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(esk6_0),not(esk5_0)),implies(esk5_0,esk6_0)))
        | modus_tollens ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[modus_tollens])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    not(implies(X1,not(X2))) = and(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    implies(not(X1),X2) = or(X1,X2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)))
    | ~ modus_tollens ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    modus_tollens,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_modus_tollens]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    not(or(X1,not(X2))) = and(not(X1),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X101,X102] :
      ( ( ~ r3
        | is_a_theorem(implies(or(X101,X102),or(X102,X101))) )
      & ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk48_0,esk49_0),or(esk49_0,esk48_0)))
        | r3 ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r3])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r3,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[principia_r3])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,not(X2)),implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_28]),c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    implies(or(X1,not(X2)),X3) = or(and(not(X1),X2),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( r3
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk48_0,esk49_0),or(esk49_0,esk48_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    is_a_theorem(or(and(not(X1),X2),implies(X2,X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    or(and(X1,not(X2)),X3) = implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(or(esk48_0,esk49_0),or(esk49_0,esk48_0))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_28]),c_0_39]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : LCL456+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 12:47:37 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.8Xs2XazSsH/E---3.1_15363.p
% 0.19/0.50  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 15441 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FGUSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 750s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting U----_207d_00_B07_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with pid 15456 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FGUSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 750s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 53
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 82
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 82
% 0.19/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 191
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 27
% 0.19/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 11
% 0.19/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 153
% 0.19/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.19/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 416
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 333
% 0.19/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 416
% 0.19/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 268
% 0.19/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 91
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 63
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.19/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 24
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 275
% 0.19/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 357
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 62
% 0.19/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 147
% 0.19/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 147
% 0.19/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 10
% 0.19/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28
% 0.19/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 34
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 8382
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.016 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1964 pages
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.057 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.014 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.071 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
% 0.19/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------