TSTP Solution File: LCL455+1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : LCL455+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:19:04 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.47s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : LCL455+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 18:47:30 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.47 Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.19/0.47 fof(hilbert_or_2, axiom, or_2).
% 0.19/0.47 fof(or_2, axiom, or_2 <=> ![X, Y]: is_a_theorem(implies(Y, or(X, Y)))).
% 0.19/0.47 fof(principia_r2, conjecture, r2).
% 0.19/0.47 fof(r2, axiom, r2 <=> ![P, Q]: is_a_theorem(implies(Q, or(P, Q)))).
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.19/0.47 http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.19/0.47 We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.19/0.47 fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.19/0.47 C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.19/0.47 where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.19/0.47 variables of u and v.
% 0.19/0.47 A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.19/0.47 input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 Axiom 1 (hilbert_or_2): or_2 = true.
% 0.19/0.47 Axiom 2 (r2): fresh11(X, X) = true.
% 0.19/0.47 Axiom 3 (or_2_1): fresh16(X, X, Y, Z) = true.
% 0.19/0.47 Axiom 4 (or_2_1): fresh16(or_2, true, X, Y) = is_a_theorem(implies(Y, or(X, Y))).
% 0.19/0.47 Axiom 5 (r2): fresh11(is_a_theorem(implies(q4, or(p4, q4))), true) = r2.
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 Goal 1 (principia_r2): r2 = true.
% 0.19/0.47 Proof:
% 0.19/0.47 r2
% 0.19/0.47 = { by axiom 5 (r2) R->L }
% 0.19/0.47 fresh11(is_a_theorem(implies(q4, or(p4, q4))), true)
% 0.19/0.47 = { by axiom 4 (or_2_1) R->L }
% 0.19/0.47 fresh11(fresh16(or_2, true, p4, q4), true)
% 0.19/0.47 = { by axiom 1 (hilbert_or_2) }
% 0.19/0.47 fresh11(fresh16(true, true, p4, q4), true)
% 0.19/0.47 = { by axiom 3 (or_2_1) }
% 0.19/0.47 fresh11(true, true)
% 0.19/0.47 = { by axiom 2 (r2) }
% 0.19/0.47 true
% 0.19/0.47 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------