TSTP Solution File: LCL455+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : LCL455+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:12:49 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 24 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 19 ( 9 ~; 6 |; 2 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 3 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 2 sgn; 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(r2,axiom,
( r2
<=> ! [X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(X5,or(X4,X5))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZGCWsVc5AO/E---3.1_27289.p',r2) ).
fof(principia_r2,conjecture,
r2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZGCWsVc5AO/E---3.1_27289.p',principia_r2) ).
fof(or_2,axiom,
( or_2
<=> ! [X1,X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(X2,or(X1,X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZGCWsVc5AO/E---3.1_27289.p',or_2) ).
fof(hilbert_or_2,axiom,
or_2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZGCWsVc5AO/E---3.1_27289.p',hilbert_or_2) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X97,X98] :
( ( ~ r2
| is_a_theorem(implies(X98,or(X97,X98))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk47_0,or(esk46_0,esk47_0)))
| r2 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r2])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ r2,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[principia_r2])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X49,X50] :
( ( ~ or_2
| is_a_theorem(implies(X50,or(X49,X50))) )
& ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk23_0,or(esk22_0,esk23_0)))
| or_2 ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[or_2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( r2
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk47_0,or(esk46_0,esk47_0))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ r2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1)))
| ~ or_2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
or_2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[hilbert_or_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(esk47_0,or(esk46_0,esk47_0))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.10 % Problem : LCL455+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 12:05:36 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZGCWsVc5AO/E---3.1_27289.p
% 0.15/0.43 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 27367 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: FGUSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 750s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting U----_207d_00_B07_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 27378 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: FGUSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 750s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 53
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses : 82
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 82
% 0.15/0.43 # Processed clauses : 49
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 14
% 0.15/0.43 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 34
% 0.15/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 20
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 33
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 23
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 9
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 33
% 0.15/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 66
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3817
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1960 pages
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.016 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
% 0.15/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------