TSTP Solution File: LCL447-2 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : LCL447-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:48:08 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.19s 1.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.62s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 8 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 8 ~; 5 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 9 ( 4 >; 5 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 (; 20 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ c_in > c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 > c_PropLog_Othms > #nlpp > tc_PropLog_Opl > v_q > v_p > v_H > t_a
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62,type,
c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(v_q,type,
v_q: $i ).
tff(t_a,type,
t_a: $i ).
tff(c_PropLog_Othms,type,
c_PropLog_Othms: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(c_in,type,
c_in: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(v_H,type,
v_H: $i ).
tff(tc_PropLog_Opl,type,
tc_PropLog_Opl: $i > $i ).
tff(v_p,type,
v_p: $i ).
tff(f_26,axiom,
c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_30,axiom,
! [V_p,V_q,T_a,V_H] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_q,V_p,T_a),T_a),c_PropLog_Othms(V_H,T_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_38,axiom,
! [V_p,V_H,T_a,V_q] :
( ~ c_in(V_p,c_PropLog_Othms(V_H,T_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a))
| ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p,V_q,T_a),c_PropLog_Othms(V_H,T_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a))
| c_in(V_q,c_PropLog_Othms(V_H,T_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_28,axiom,
~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).
tff(c_6,plain,
! [V_p_1,V_q_2,T_a_3,V_H_4] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p_1,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_q_2,V_p_1,T_a_3),T_a_3),c_PropLog_Othms(V_H_4,T_a_3),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_3)),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_30]) ).
tff(c_10,plain,
! [V_q_13,V_H_14,T_a_15,V_p_16] :
( c_in(V_q_13,c_PropLog_Othms(V_H_14,T_a_15),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_15))
| ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p_16,V_q_13,T_a_15),c_PropLog_Othms(V_H_14,T_a_15),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_15))
| ~ c_in(V_p_16,c_PropLog_Othms(V_H_14,T_a_15),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_15)) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_38]) ).
tff(c_15,plain,
! [V_q_17,V_p_18,T_a_19,V_H_20] :
( c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_q_17,V_p_18,T_a_19),c_PropLog_Othms(V_H_20,T_a_19),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_19))
| ~ c_in(V_p_18,c_PropLog_Othms(V_H_20,T_a_19),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_19)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_10]) ).
tff(c_4,plain,
~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).
tff(c_21,plain,
~ c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_4]) ).
tff(c_26,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_21]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : LCL447-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 14:05:33 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 2.19/1.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.19/1.58
% 2.19/1.58 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.62/1.62
% 2.62/1.62 Inference rules
% 2.62/1.62 ----------------------
% 2.62/1.62 #Ref : 0
% 2.62/1.62 #Sup : 3
% 2.62/1.62 #Fact : 0
% 2.62/1.62 #Define : 0
% 2.62/1.62 #Split : 0
% 2.62/1.62 #Chain : 0
% 2.62/1.62 #Close : 0
% 2.62/1.62
% 2.62/1.62 Ordering : KBO
% 2.62/1.62
% 2.62/1.62 Simplification rules
% 2.62/1.62 ----------------------
% 2.62/1.62 #Subsume : 0
% 2.62/1.62 #Demod : 1
% 2.62/1.62 #Tautology : 1
% 2.62/1.62 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 2.62/1.62 #BackRed : 0
% 2.62/1.62
% 2.62/1.62 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.62/1.62 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.62/1.62
% 2.62/1.62 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.62/1.62 ----------------------
% 2.62/1.62 Preprocessing : 0.39
% 2.62/1.62 Parsing : 0.22
% 2.62/1.62 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.62/1.62 Main loop : 0.14
% 2.62/1.62 Inferencing : 0.07
% 2.62/1.62 Reduction : 0.03
% 2.62/1.62 Demodulation : 0.03
% 2.62/1.62 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.62/1.62 Subsumption : 0.03
% 2.62/1.62 Abstraction : 0.01
% 2.62/1.62 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.62/1.62 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.62/1.62 Total : 0.59
% 2.62/1.62 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.62/1.62 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.62/1.62 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.62/1.62 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------