TSTP Solution File: LCL447-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : LCL447-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:24:56 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0,axiom,
( c_in(X4,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X4,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LjyXTM3t9V/E---3.1_6128.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0) ).
cnf(cls_PropLog_Othms_OK_0,axiom,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X2,X1,X3),X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LjyXTM3t9V/E---3.1_6128.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OK_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LjyXTM3t9V/E---3.1_6128.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LjyXTM3t9V/E---3.1_6128.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( c_in(X4,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X4,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X2,X1,X3),X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),
cls_PropLog_Othms_OK_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X2,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| ~ c_in(X2,c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.11 % Problem : LCL447-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 13:08:19 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.51 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LjyXTM3t9V/E---3.1_6128.p
% 0.17/0.54 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.54 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.54 # new_bool_1 with pid 6208 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.17/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.54 # Search class: FHUSF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.54 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 6210 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.17/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.54 # Search class: FHUSF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.54 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.54
% 0.17/0.54 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.54 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.54 # Parsed axioms : 1371
% 0.17/0.54 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1364
% 0.17/0.54 # Initial clauses : 7
% 0.17/0.54 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.17/0.54 # Processed clauses : 16
% 0.17/0.54 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # ...remaining for further processing : 16
% 0.17/0.54 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Generated clauses : 7
% 0.17/0.54 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.17/0.54 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Paramodulations : 5
% 0.17/0.54 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.17/0.54 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.17/0.54 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.54 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.54 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.54 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.54 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.54 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.17/0.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.17/0.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.17/0.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.17/0.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.17/0.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 3
% 0.17/0.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 7
% 0.17/0.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11
% 0.17/0.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.17/0.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.17/0.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7968
% 0.17/0.54
% 0.17/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.54 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.54 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.54 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.17/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 2844 pages
% 0.17/0.54
% 0.17/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.54 # User time : 0.020 s
% 0.17/0.54 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.17/0.54 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 0.17/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 2400 pages
% 0.17/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------