TSTP Solution File: LCL446-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL446-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:30:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.40s
% Output : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : LCL446-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 12:32:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Mon Jul 4 12:32:37 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 21785.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.13/0.36 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.13/0.36 in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.13/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 4
% 0.13/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 50
% 0.13/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.13/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 7
% 0.13/0.39 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.13/0.39 distinct function count: 3
% 0.13/0.39 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.13/0.40 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.40 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.01 sec ----> 16 [binary,15.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Length of proof is 6. Level of proof is 5.
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.13/0.40 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.40 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 1 [] {+} -c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_p,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)).
% 0.13/0.40 2 [] {+} -c_in(A,c_PropLog_Othms(B,C),tc_PropLog_Opl(C))| -c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(A,D,C),c_PropLog_Othms(B,C),tc_PropLog_Opl(C))|c_in(D,c_PropLog_Othms(B,C),tc_PropLog_Opl(C)).
% 0.13/0.40 3 [] {-} c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(A,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(B,A,C),C),c_PropLog_Othms(D,C),tc_PropLog_Opl(C)).
% 0.13/0.40 4 [] {-} c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(A,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(B,C,D),D),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(A,B,D),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(A,C,D),D),D),c_PropLog_Othms(E,D),tc_PropLog_Opl(D)).
% 0.13/0.40 5 [hyper,3,2,3] {-} c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(A,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(B,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(C,B,D),D),D),c_PropLog_Othms(E,D),tc_PropLog_Opl(D)).
% 0.13/0.40 6 [hyper,5,2,3] {-} c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(A,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(B,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(C,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(D,C,E),E),E),E),c_PropLog_Othms(F,E),tc_PropLog_Opl(E)).
% 0.13/0.40 7 [hyper,6,2,3] {-} c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(A,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(B,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(C,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(D,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(E,D,F),F),F),F),F),c_PropLog_Othms(G,F),tc_PropLog_Opl(F)).
% 0.13/0.40 8 [hyper,7,2,3] {-} c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(A,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(B,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(C,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(D,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(E,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(F,E,G),G),G),G),G),G),c_PropLog_Othms(H,G),tc_PropLog_Opl(G)).
% 0.13/0.40 11 [hyper,4,2,3] {-} c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(A,B,C),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(A,A,C),C),c_PropLog_Othms(D,C),tc_PropLog_Opl(C)).
% 0.13/0.40 15 [hyper,11,2,8] {-} c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(A,A,B),c_PropLog_Othms(C,B),tc_PropLog_Opl(B)).
% 0.13/0.40 16 [binary,15.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.13/0.40 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 ============ end of search ============
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 0.13/0.40 false clauses given 7
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 FALSE TRUE
% 0.13/0.40 19 1 0
% 0.13/0.40 28 2 0
% 0.13/0.40 34 1 0
% 0.13/0.40 tot: 4 0 (0.0% true)
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Process 21785 finished Mon Jul 4 12:32:37 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------