TSTP Solution File: LCL446-2 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : LCL446-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:15:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.34s
% Output : Proof 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_p,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_p,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OK_0)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_p,t_a),t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OK_0)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(t_a,v_p,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_p,t_a),t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OS_0)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL446-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 12:12:17 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % symbols: 9
% 0.13/0.34 % clauses: 4
% 0.13/0.34 % start clauses: 1
% 0.13/0.34 % iterative deepening steps: 63
% 0.13/0.34 % maximum path limit: 4
% 0.13/0.34 % literal attempts: 307
% 0.13/0.34 % depth failures: 77
% 0.13/0.34 % regularity failures: 7
% 0.13/0.34 % tautology failures: 0
% 0.13/0.34 % reductions: 0
% 0.13/0.34 % extensions: 245
% 0.13/0.34 % SAT variables: 220
% 0.13/0.34 % SAT clauses: 229
% 0.13/0.34 % WalkSAT solutions: 221
% 0.13/0.34 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.13/0.34 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.34 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------