TSTP Solution File: LCL446-1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : LCL446-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 11:05:35 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 51.75s 7.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 51.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,X2),X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OK_0) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
    | ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
    | c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X2,X3),X3),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,X3),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X2,X3),X3),X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OS_0) ).

cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_p,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_22157,plain,
    c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_p,t_a) = sP0_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_22158,plain,
    c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a) = sP1_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_22159,plain,
    tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a) = sP2_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_22160,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(sP0_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_22159,c_22158,c_22157]) ).

cnf(c_27584,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X2,X3),X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
    | c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,X3),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X2,X3),X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_27587,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X2,X3),X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
    | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
    | c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X2,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_27584,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_27591,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
    | c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X0,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_27587]) ).

cnf(c_27597,plain,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X0,X1),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X1),tc_PropLog_Opl(X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_27591]) ).

cnf(c_31595,plain,
    c_in(sP0_iProver_def,c_PropLog_Othms(X0,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_22157,c_27597]) ).

cnf(c_31637,plain,
    c_in(sP0_iProver_def,c_PropLog_Othms(X0,t_a),sP2_iProver_def),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_31595,c_22159]) ).

cnf(c_31896,plain,
    c_in(sP0_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_22158,c_31637]) ).

cnf(c_31897,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_31896,c_22160]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : LCL446-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Sat Jun 22 10:58:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 51.75/7.73  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 51.75/7.73  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  ------  iProver source info
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  git: date: 2024-06-12 09:56:46 +0000
% 51.75/7.73  git: sha1: 4869ab62f0a3398f9d3a35e6db7918ebd3847e49
% 51.75/7.73  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  ------ Parsing...successful
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 823 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 69 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 69 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 51.75/7.73  ------ Proving...
% 51.75/7.73  ------ Problem Properties 
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  clauses                                 309
% 51.75/7.73  conjectures                             1
% 51.75/7.73  EPR                                     27
% 51.75/7.73  Horn                                    282
% 51.75/7.73  unary                                   84
% 51.75/7.73  binary                                  177
% 51.75/7.73  lits                                    582
% 51.75/7.73  lits eq                                 174
% 51.75/7.73  fd_pure                                 0
% 51.75/7.73  fd_pseudo                               0
% 51.75/7.73  fd_cond                                 21
% 51.75/7.73  fd_pseudo_cond                          43
% 51.75/7.73  AC symbols                              0
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  ------ 
% 51.75/7.73  Current options:
% 51.75/7.73  ------ 
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  ------ Proving...
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 51.75/7.73  
% 51.75/7.73  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------