TSTP Solution File: LCL445-2 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : LCL445-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:42:34 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   14 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    8 (   5   ~;   3   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f14,f11]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_q,t_a),v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f6,f8,f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
      | ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
      | c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f1,f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X1,X2,tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
      | c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Odeduction_0) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(v_p,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,X3),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,X3),X0,X3),X0,X3),X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms__excluded__middle_0) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_q,t_a),v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f3,f12,f5]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f2,f4]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ~ c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : LCL445-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 01:59:25 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.49  % (16076)lrs+10_5:1_br=off:fde=none:nwc=3.0:sd=1:sgt=10:sos=on:ss=axioms:urr=on:i=34:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/34Mi)
% 0.20/0.49  % (16093)lrs+10_1:7_av=off:awrs=converge:awrsf=40:br=off:bsd=on:cond=on:drc=off:nwc=3.0:plsq=on:plsqc=1:s2a=on:s2agt=16:to=lpo:urr=on:i=6:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (16084)lrs+10_1:1_drc=off:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=5:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/5Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (16080)lrs+1011_1:1_atotf=0.0306256:ep=RST:mep=off:nm=0:sos=all:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (16076)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.50  % (16076)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.50  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.50  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50  % (16076)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  % (16076)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.50  % (16076)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.50  % (16076)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  % (16076)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.20/0.50  % (16076)Time elapsed: 0.091 s
% 0.20/0.50  % (16076)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.50  % (16076)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  % (16076)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  % (16064)Success in time 0.143 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------