TSTP Solution File: LCL445-2 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : LCL445-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:37:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.41s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   19 (   0 equ;  10 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(u,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(v,w,tc_PropLog_Opl(x)),x),tc_PropLog_Opl(x))
    | c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v,u,x),c_PropLog_Othms(w,x),tc_PropLog_Opl(x)) ),
    file('LCL445-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ c_in(u,c_PropLog_Othms(v,w),tc_PropLog_Opl(w))
    | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(u,x,w),c_PropLog_Othms(v,w),tc_PropLog_Opl(w))
    | c_in(x,c_PropLog_Othms(v,w),tc_PropLog_Opl(w)) ),
    file('LCL445-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(u,v,w),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(u,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,w),v,w),v,w),w),c_PropLog_Othms(x,w),tc_PropLog_Opl(w)),
    file('LCL445-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(v,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('LCL445-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('LCL445-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ~ c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('LCL445-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(u,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
    | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(u,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,6]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.2,6.0')] ).

cnf(8,plain,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[4,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:4.0,1.0')] ).

cnf(10,plain,
    c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,1]),
    [iquote('0:Res:5.0,1.0')] ).

cnf(22,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(u,v,w),c_PropLog_Othms(x,w),tc_PropLog_Opl(w))
    | c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(u,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,w),v,w),v,w),c_PropLog_Othms(x,w),tc_PropLog_Opl(w)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,2]),
    [iquote('0:Res:3.0,2.1')] ).

cnf(23,plain,
    ( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(u,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
    | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(u,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[22,7]),
    [iquote('0:Res:22.1,7.1')] ).

cnf(27,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[10,23]),
    [iquote('0:Res:10.0,23.1')] ).

cnf(28,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[27,8]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:27.0,8.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : LCL445-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jul  2 13:08:23 EDT 2022
% 0.19/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.41  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS derived 21 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 20 clauses.
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS allocated 63151 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 13 :
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.41  Formulae used in the proof : cls_PropLog_Odeduction_0 cls_PropLog_Othms_OMP_0 cls_PropLog_Othms__excluded__middle_0 cls_conjecture_0 cls_conjecture_1 cls_conjecture_2
% 0.19/0.41  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------