TSTP Solution File: LCL444-2 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : LCL444-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 10:22:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 10.81s 11.00s
% Output : CNFRefutation 10.81s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : LCL444-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.10 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.09/0.31 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.31 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.31 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 15:40:40 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.33 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.33 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.15/0.33 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
% 0.15/0.33 #
% 0.15/0.33 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.33 # Number of axioms: 7 Number of unprocessed: 7
% 0.15/0.33 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.15/0.33 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.15/0.33 # Hello from C++
% 9.74/9.93 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 9.74/9.93 # Local unification is enabled...
% 9.74/9.93 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 9.74/9.93 # 7 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 9.74/9.93 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 9.74/9.93 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 9.74/9.93 # Found 3 unit axioms.
% 9.74/9.93 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 9.74/9.93 # 4 extension rule candidate clauses
% 9.74/9.93 # 3 unit axiom clauses
% 9.74/9.93
% 9.74/9.93 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 9.74/9.93 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 10.81/11.00 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 10.81/11.00 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 10.81/11.00 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 10.81/11.00 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 10.81/11.00 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 10.81/11.00 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 10.81/11.00 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 10.81/11.00 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 10.81/11.00 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.81/11.00 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.81/11.00 # Begin clausification derivation
% 10.81/11.00
% 10.81/11.00 # End clausification derivation
% 10.81/11.00 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 10.81/11.00 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (c_in(X1,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X3))).
% 10.81/11.00 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,X2),c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,X2),X1,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)))).
% 10.81/11.00 cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (~c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_q,t_a),v_q,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)))).
% 10.81/11.00 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))|~c_in(X1,X2,tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)))).
% 10.81/11.00 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (c_in(X1,c_insert(X2,X3,X4),X4)|~c_in(X1,X3,X4))).
% 10.81/11.00 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))|~c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X4,X1,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))|~c_in(X4,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)))).
% 10.81/11.00 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X2,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))|~c_in(X2,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X1,X4,tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)))).
% 10.81/11.00 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 10.81/11.00 # Begin printing tableau
% 10.81/11.00 # Found 4 steps
% 10.81/11.00 cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (~c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_q,t_a),v_q,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))), inference(start_rule)).
% 10.81/11.00 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (~c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_q,t_a),v_q,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])).
% 10.81/11.00 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (~c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_q,t_a),v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_10])).
% 10.81/11.00 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (~c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),v_q,t_a),v_q,t_a),c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_26, ...])).
% 10.81/11.00 # End printing tableau
% 10.81/11.00 # SZS output end
% 10.81/11.00 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 10.81/11.00 # Returning from population with 3 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 10.81/11.00 # We now have 3 tableaux to operate on
% 10.81/11.00 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 10.81/11.00 # Proof search is over...
% 10.81/11.00 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------