TSTP Solution File: LCL441-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL441-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:30:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.76s 0.94s
% Output : Refutation 0.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : LCL441-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 16:25:22 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.34 The process was started by sandbox on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.34 Sun Jul 3 16:25:22 2022
% 0.13/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 16935.
% 0.13/0.34
% 0.13/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.13/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.13/0.35 in usable.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.46/0.65 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.46/0.65 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.46/0.65 number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.46/0.65 number of clauses initially in problem: 3
% 0.46/0.65 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 66
% 0.46/0.65 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.46/0.65 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 66
% 0.46/0.65 absolute distinct symbol count: 10
% 0.46/0.65 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.46/0.65 distinct function count: 5
% 0.46/0.65 distinct constant count: 4
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.76/0.94 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/0.94 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.56 sec ----> 6 [hyper,4,1,4] {-} $F.
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Length of proof is 1. Level of proof is 1.
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.76/0.94 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/0.94 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 1 [] {+} -c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_emptyset,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))| -c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a,t_a),c_emptyset,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)).
% 0.76/0.94 2 [] {+} -c_in(A,B,tc_PropLog_Opl(C))|c_in(A,c_PropLog_Othms(B,C),tc_PropLog_Opl(C)).
% 0.76/0.94 3 [] {-} c_in(A,c_insert(A,B,C),C).
% 0.76/0.94 4 [hyper,3,2] {-} c_in(A,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(A,B,tc_PropLog_Opl(C)),C),tc_PropLog_Opl(C)).
% 0.76/0.94 6 [hyper,4,1,4] {-} $F.
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.76/0.94 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 ============ end of search ============
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 0.76/0.94 false clauses given 2
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 FALSE TRUE
% 0.76/0.94 tot: 0 0 (-nan% true)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Process 16935 finished Sun Jul 3 16:25:23 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------