TSTP Solution File: LCL441-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : LCL441-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:12:45 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(v_a,v_tt,t_a)
| ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a,t_a),c_emptyset,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ubJZjJQz5Q/E---3.1_3128.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_PropLog_Othms_OH_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ubJZjJQz5Q/E---3.1_3128.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OH_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_OinsertCI_1,axiom,
c_in(X1,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ubJZjJQz5Q/E---3.1_3128.p',cls_Set_OinsertCI_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(v_a,v_tt,t_a)
| ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_emptyset,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ubJZjJQz5Q/E---3.1_3128.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(v_a,v_tt,t_a)
| ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a,t_a),c_emptyset,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
cls_PropLog_Othms_OH_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
c_in(X1,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X3),
cls_Set_OinsertCI_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(v_a,v_tt,t_a)
| ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Ovar(v_a,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_emptyset,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_a,v_tt,t_a),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.17 % Problem : LCL441-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.18 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.17/0.38 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.38 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.17/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 12:44:21 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.56 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ubJZjJQz5Q/E---3.1_3128.p
% 0.23/0.59 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.23/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # new_bool_3 with pid 3208 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.23/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.59 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.59 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 100s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 3212 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.23/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.59 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.59 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.59 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 100s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.59 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.59 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.59
% 0.23/0.59 # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.59 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.59 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.59 # Parsed axioms : 1377
% 0.23/0.59 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1296
% 0.23/0.59 # Initial clauses : 81
% 0.23/0.59 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.23/0.59 # Initial clauses in saturation : 80
% 0.23/0.59 # Processed clauses : 135
% 0.23/0.59 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # ...subsumed : 7
% 0.23/0.59 # ...remaining for further processing : 127
% 0.23/0.59 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.23/0.59 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.23/0.59 # Generated clauses : 8
% 0.23/0.59 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.23/0.59 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Paramodulations : 4
% 0.23/0.59 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.23/0.59 # Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.59 # Current number of processed clauses : 53
% 0.23/0.59 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.23/0.59 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 0.23/0.59 # Non-unit-clauses : 35
% 0.23/0.59 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19
% 0.23/0.59 # ...number of literals in the above : 42
% 0.23/0.59 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Current number of archived clauses : 74
% 0.23/0.59 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 961
% 0.23/0.59 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 958
% 0.23/0.59 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.23/0.59 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 0.23/0.59 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # BW rewrite match attempts : 14
% 0.23/0.59 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.23/0.59 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.59 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9316
% 0.23/0.59
% 0.23/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.59 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.23/0.59 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.59 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.23/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 2796 pages
% 0.23/0.59
% 0.23/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.59 # User time : 0.025 s
% 0.23/0.59 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.23/0.59 # Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.23/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 2412 pages
% 0.23/0.59 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.23/0.60 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------