TSTP Solution File: LCL439-2 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : LCL439-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:42:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.57s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 8 ~; 5 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 19 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f34,plain,
$false,
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f5,f25,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X1] :
( c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OH_0) ).
fof(f25,plain,
~ c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(v_p,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f10,f8,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms__notE_0) ).
fof(f8,plain,
! [X0] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X0,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f6,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X3,X1,X4,X5] :
( c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X5,X4,tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X4,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Oweaken__left__insert_0) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f10,plain,
~ c_in(v_q,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(v_p,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f7,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(X1,X2,tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)),X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3))
| c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,X3),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X3),tc_PropLog_Opl(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Odeduction_0) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X3,X6,X7] : c_in(X6,c_insert(X6,X7,X3),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OinsertCI_1) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : LCL439-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.21/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.21/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 02:04:20 EDT 2022
% 0.21/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.54 % (6427)lrs+10_5:1_br=off:fde=none:nwc=3.0:sd=1:sgt=10:sos=on:ss=axioms:urr=on:i=34:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/34Mi)
% 0.21/0.55 % (6423)lrs+10_1:1_kws=precedence:lwlo=on:tgt=ground:i=99966:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99966Mi)
% 0.21/0.56 % (6431)lrs+1011_1:1_atotf=0.0306256:ep=RST:mep=off:nm=0:sos=all:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.56 % (6426)lrs+10_1:1_bd=off:drc=off:lcm=reverse:nwc=5.0:sd=1:sgt=16:spb=goal_then_units:ss=axioms:to=lpo:i=43:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/43Mi)
% 0.21/0.56 % (6431)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.56 % (6431)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.56 % (6431)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.56 % (6431)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.56 % (6431)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.56 % (6431)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.56
% 0.21/0.56 % (6431)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.21/0.56 % (6431)Time elapsed: 0.128 s
% 0.21/0.56 % (6431)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.21/0.56 % (6431)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.56 % (6431)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57 % (6427)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.57 % (6427)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.57 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.57 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.57 % (6427)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57 % (6427)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.57 % (6427)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.57 % (6427)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 % (6427)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.21/0.57 % (6427)Time elapsed: 0.150 s
% 0.21/0.57 % (6427)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.57 % (6427)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57 % (6427)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57 % (6422)Success in time 0.211 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------