%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem  : LCL438-2 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality:r
% Format   : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command  : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2794MHz
% Memory   : 1003MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4
% CPULimit : 600s

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output   : Assurance 0.0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /tmp/SystemOnTPTP29151/LCL/LCL438-2+noeq.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
% 
% prove-all-passes started
% 
% detected problem class: hne
% detected subclass: small
% detected subclass: short
% 
% strategies selected: 
% (hyper 29 #f 4 5)
% (binary-unit 11 #f 4 5)
% (binary-double 17 #f 4 5)
% (hyper 29 #f)
% (binary-unit 34 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 40 #f)
% (binary 17 #t)
% (binary-order 29 #f)
% (binary-posweight-order 111 #f 4 5)
% (binary-posweight-order 283 #f)
% 
% 
% ********* EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED *********
% 
% 
% timer checkpoints: c(5,40,0,10,0,0)
% 
% 
% START OF PROOF
% 6 [] -c_in(c_^prop^log_^opl_^oop_^a_^n_62(X,Y,Z),c_^prop^log_^othms(U,Z),tc_^prop^log_^opl(Z)) | -c_in(X,c_^prop^log_^othms(U,Z),tc_^prop^log_^opl(Z)) | c_in(Y,c_^prop^log_^othms(U,Z),tc_^prop^log_^opl(Z)).
% 7 [] c_in(c_^prop^log_^opl_^oop_^a_^n_62(c_^prop^log_^opl_^oop_^a_^n_62(X,c_^prop^log_^opl_^oop_^a_^n_62(Y,Z,U),U),c_^prop^log_^opl_^oop_^a_^n_62(c_^prop^log_^opl_^oop_^a_^n_62(X,Y,U),c_^prop^log_^opl_^oop_^a_^n_62(X,Z,U),U),U),c_^prop^log_^othms(V,U),tc_^prop^log_^opl(U)).
% 8 [] c_in(c_^prop^log_^opl_^oop_^a_^n_62(v_p,c_^prop^log_^opl_^oop_^a_^n_62(v_pa,v_q,t_a),t_a),c_^prop^log_^othms(v_^h,t_a),tc_^prop^log_^opl(t_a)).
% 9 [] c_in(c_^prop^log_^opl_^oop_^a_^n_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_^prop^log_^othms(v_^h,t_a),tc_^prop^log_^opl(t_a)).
% 10 [] -c_in(c_^prop^log_^opl_^oop_^a_^n_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_^prop^log_^othms(v_^h,t_a),tc_^prop^log_^opl(t_a)).
% 21 [hyper:6,7,8] c_in(c_^prop^log_^opl_^oop_^a_^n_62(c_^prop^log_^opl_^oop_^a_^n_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_^prop^log_^opl_^oop_^a_^n_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),t_a),c_^prop^log_^othms(v_^h,t_a),tc_^prop^log_^opl(t_a)).
% 23 [hyper:6,21,cut:9] c_in(c_^prop^log_^opl_^oop_^a_^n_62(v_p,v_q,t_a),c_^prop^log_^othms(v_^h,t_a),tc_^prop^log_^opl(t_a)).
% 28 [hyper:10,23] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
% 
% Proof found by the following strategy:
% 
% using hyperresolution
% not using sos strategy
% using positive unit paramodulation strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% clause length limited to 5
% clause depth limited to 4
% seconds given: 29
% 
% 
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
% 
% Global statistics over all passes: 
% 
%  given clauses:    7
%  derived clauses:   24
%  kept clauses:      4
%  kept size sum:     58
%  kept mid-nuclei:   12
%  kept new demods:   0
%  forw unit-subs:    2
%  forw double-subs: 0
%  forw overdouble-subs: 0
%  backward subs:     0
%  fast unit cutoff:  2
%  full unit cutoff:  0
%  dbl  unit cutoff:  0
%  real runtime  :  0.1
%  process. runtime:  0.0
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics: 
%  tried:           0
%  length fails:    0
%  strength fails:  0
%  predlist fails:  0
%  aux str. fails:  0
%  by-lit fails:    0
%  full subs tried: 0
%  full subs fail:  0
% 
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/tmp/SystemOnTPTP29151/LCL/LCL438-2+noeq.in")
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------