TSTP Solution File: LCL437-2 by Moca---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Moca---0.1
% Problem : LCL437-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : moca.sh %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 13:01:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.39s
% Output : Proof 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL437-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : moca.sh %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 15:24:29 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.39 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.18/0.39 The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p, c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa, c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), v_pa, t_a), t_a), c_PropLog_Othms(v_H, t_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ==> \bottom
% 0.18/0.39 c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p, c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, T_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, T_a), V_p, T_a), c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a))
% 0.18/0.39 c_in(V_q, c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)) ==> c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p, V_q, T_a), c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a))
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 This holds because
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 E:
% 0.18/0.39 c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p, c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, T_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, T_a), V_p, T_a), c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)) = true__
% 0.18/0.39 f1(c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p, c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa, c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), v_pa, t_a), t_a), c_PropLog_Othms(v_H, t_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))) = true__
% 0.18/0.39 f1(true__) = false__
% 0.18/0.39 f2(c_in(V_q, c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)), V_p, V_q, T_a, V_H) = true__
% 0.18/0.39 f2(true__, V_p, V_q, T_a, V_H) = c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p, V_q, T_a), c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a))
% 0.18/0.39 G:
% 0.18/0.39 true__ = false__
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 This holds because
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(Y3, c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0, c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1, c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, Y2), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, Y2), X1, Y2), Y2), Y2), c_PropLog_Othms(Y1, Y2), tc_PropLog_Opl(Y2)) -> true__
% 0.18/0.39 c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(Y3, c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0, c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, Y2), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, Y2), X0, Y2), Y2), c_PropLog_Othms(Y1, Y2), tc_PropLog_Opl(Y2)) -> true__
% 0.18/0.39 c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p, c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, T_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, T_a), V_p, T_a), c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)) -> true__
% 0.18/0.39 f1(c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p, c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa, c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse, t_a), v_pa, t_a), t_a), c_PropLog_Othms(v_H, t_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))) -> true__
% 0.18/0.39 f1(true__) -> false__
% 0.18/0.39 f2(c_in(V_q, c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)), V_p, V_q, T_a, V_H) -> true__
% 0.18/0.39 f2(true__, V_p, V_q, T_a, V_H) -> c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p, V_q, T_a), c_PropLog_Othms(V_H, T_a), tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a))
% 0.18/0.39 false__ -> true__
% 0.18/0.39 with the LPO induced by
% 0.18/0.39 f2 > tc_PropLog_Opl > v_H > c_PropLog_Othms > t_a > c_PropLog_Opl_Ofalse > v_pa > v_p > c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 > c_in > f1 > false__ > true__
% 0.18/0.39
% 0.18/0.39 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.18/0.39
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------