TSTP Solution File: LCL436-2 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : LCL436-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 13:46:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.44s 0.98s
% Output : Refutation 0.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : LCL436-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 15:23:53 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.44/0.98 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.44/0.98 Process 4183 was started by sandbox on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.44/0.98 Mon Jul 4 15:23:53 2022
% 0.44/0.98 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_4030_n008.cluster.edu".
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_4030_n008.cluster.edu
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.44/0.98 set(auto2).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.44/0.98 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.44/0.98 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.44/0.98 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.98 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.44/0.98 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.44/0.98 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.44/0.98 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.44/0.98 clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (3 formulas)
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 Auto_denials:
% 0.44/0.98 % copying label cls_conjecture_0 to answer in negative clause
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % Assigning unary symbol tc_PropLog_Opl kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (10).
% 0.44/0.98 Function symbol KB weights: t_a=1. v_H=1. v_p=1. v_pa=1. v_q=1. v_r=1. c_PropLog_Othms=1. c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62=1. tc_PropLog_Opl=0.
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.44/0.98 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.44/0.98 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds: cls_conjecture_0.
% 0.44/0.98 % Length of proof is 5.
% 0.44/0.98 % Level of proof is 2.
% 0.44/0.98 % Maximum clause weight is 28.000.
% 0.44/0.98 % Given clauses 3.
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 1 c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(A,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(B,C,D),D),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(A,B,D),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(A,C,D),D),D),c_PropLog_Othms(E,D),tc_PropLog_Opl(D)) # label(cls_PropLog_Othms_OS_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 2 -c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_q,v_r,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_r,t_a),t_a),t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) # label(cls_conjecture_0) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(cls_conjecture_0). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 3 -c_in(A,c_PropLog_Othms(B,C),tc_PropLog_Opl(C)) | c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(D,A,C),c_PropLog_Othms(B,C),tc_PropLog_Opl(C)) # label(cls_PropLog_Oweaken__right_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98 4 -c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_q,v_r,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_q,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_r,t_a),t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) # answer(cls_conjecture_0). [resolve(3,b,2,a)].
% 0.44/0.98 5 $F # answer(cls_conjecture_0). [resolve(4,a,1,a)].
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 Given=3. Generated=4. Kept=4. proofs=1.
% 0.44/0.98 Usable=3. Sos=0. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=3. Hints=0.
% 0.44/0.98 Megabytes=0.04.
% 0.44/0.98 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.44/0.98 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.44/0.98
% 0.44/0.98 Process 4183 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jul 4 15:23:53 2022
% 0.44/0.98 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------