TSTP Solution File: LCL436-2 by Leo-III---1.7.7

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem  : LCL436-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:30:23 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.77s 1.57s
% Output   : Refutation 2.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   5 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    9 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  138 (   4   ~;   2   |;   0   &; 132   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (  13 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    9 (   9   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (  10 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0   ^;  18   !;   0   ?;  18   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(c_in_type,type,
    c_in: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62_type,type,
    c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62: $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(v_p_type,type,
    v_p: $i ).

thf(v_pa_type,type,
    v_pa: $i ).

thf(v_q_type,type,
    v_q: $i ).

thf(v_r_type,type,
    v_r: $i ).

thf(t_a_type,type,
    t_a: $i ).

thf(c_PropLog_Othms_type,type,
    c_PropLog_Othms: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(v_H_type,type,
    v_H: $i ).

thf(tc_PropLog_Opl_type,type,
    tc_PropLog_Opl: $i > $i ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( c_in @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ v_p @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ v_pa @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ v_q @ v_r @ t_a ) @ t_a ) @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ v_pa @ v_q @ t_a ) @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ v_pa @ v_r @ t_a ) @ t_a ) @ t_a ) @ t_a ) @ ( c_PropLog_Othms @ v_H @ t_a ) @ ( tc_PropLog_Opl @ t_a ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ~ ( c_in @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ v_p @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ v_pa @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ v_q @ v_r @ t_a ) @ t_a ) @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ v_pa @ v_q @ t_a ) @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ v_pa @ v_r @ t_a ) @ t_a ) @ t_a ) @ t_a ) @ ( c_PropLog_Othms @ v_H @ t_a ) @ ( tc_PropLog_Opl @ t_a ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] : ( c_in @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ A @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ B @ C @ D ) @ D ) @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ A @ B @ D ) @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ A @ C @ D ) @ D ) @ D ) @ ( c_PropLog_Othms @ E @ D ) @ ( tc_PropLog_Opl @ D ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OS_0) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] : ( c_in @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ A @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ B @ C @ D ) @ D ) @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ A @ B @ D ) @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ A @ C @ D ) @ D ) @ D ) @ ( c_PropLog_Othms @ E @ D ) @ ( tc_PropLog_Opl @ D ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( c_in @ A @ ( c_PropLog_Othms @ B @ C ) @ ( tc_PropLog_Opl @ C ) )
      | ( c_in @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ D @ A @ C ) @ ( c_PropLog_Othms @ B @ C ) @ ( tc_PropLog_Opl @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Oweaken__right_0) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( c_in @ A @ ( c_PropLog_Othms @ B @ C ) @ ( tc_PropLog_Opl @ C ) )
      | ( c_in @ ( c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 @ D @ A @ C ) @ ( c_PropLog_Othms @ B @ C ) @ ( tc_PropLog_Opl @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[4,6,7]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : LCL436-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu May 18 16:25:31 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.92/0.84  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.17/0.96  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (118ms). 
% 1.17/0.97  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.63/1.17  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.63/1.17  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 1.63/1.17  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.63/1.23  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 2 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.83/1.25  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 2 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.83/1.26  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 1.83/1.26  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.83/1.26  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 2.77/1.57  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 2.77/1.57  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 2.77/1.57  % Time passed: 1050ms (effective reasoning time: 597ms)
% 2.77/1.57  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 2.77/1.57  % Axioms used in derivation (2): cls_PropLog_Othms_OS_0, cls_PropLog_Oweaken__right_0
% 2.77/1.57  % No. of inferences in proof: 7
% 2.77/1.57  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1050 ms resp. 597 ms w/o parsing
% 2.77/1.59  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.77/1.59  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------