%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : LCL435-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:48:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    6 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   3   ~;   1   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f4,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,X2),X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OK_0) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_q,v_pa,t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f3,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_q,v_pa,t_a),t_a),t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X1,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
      | ~ c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(X3,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Oweaken__right_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : LCL435-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 02:22:00 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.50  % (364)ott+10_1:32_abs=on:br=off:urr=ec_only:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/50Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (365)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/37Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (365)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.50  % (365)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.50  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.50  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50  % (365)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  % (365)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.50  % (365)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.50  % (365)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  % (365)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.20/0.50  % (365)Time elapsed: 0.093 s
% 0.20/0.50  % (365)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.20/0.50  % (365)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  % (365)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  % (362)Success in time 0.154 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------