TSTP Solution File: LCL434-2 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : LCL434-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 11:05:31 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.97s 1.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_pa,c_insert(v_p,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
| c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OH_0) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X0,X1),c_PropLog_Othms(X2,X1),tc_PropLog_Opl(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms__I_0) ).
cnf(c_53,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
| c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X3,X0,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Oweaken__right_0) ).
cnf(c_54,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_insert(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| X0 = X1
| c_in(X0,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OinsertE_0) ).
cnf(c_98,plain,
c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_99,plain,
c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_100,plain,
tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_101,plain,
c_insert(v_p,v_H,sP2_iProver_def) = sP3_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_102,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(sP0_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_100,c_99,c_98]) ).
cnf(c_103,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_pa,sP3_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_101]) ).
cnf(c_264,plain,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X0,t_a),sP1_iProver_def,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_52]) ).
cnf(c_266,plain,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X0,t_a),sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_264,c_100]) ).
cnf(c_272,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| c_in(X0,sP1_iProver_def,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_274,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,v_H,sP2_iProver_def)
| c_in(X0,sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_272,c_100]) ).
cnf(c_288,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,sP3_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def)
| X0 = v_p
| c_in(X0,v_H,sP2_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_54]) ).
cnf(c_298,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,t_a),sP1_iProver_def,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_53]) ).
cnf(c_303,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def)
| c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,t_a),sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_298,c_99,c_100]) ).
cnf(c_323,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_pa,sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def)
| c_in(sP0_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_303]) ).
cnf(c_324,plain,
~ c_in(v_pa,sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_323,c_102]) ).
cnf(c_331,plain,
( v_pa = v_p
| c_in(v_pa,v_H,sP2_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_288]) ).
cnf(c_338,plain,
( v_pa = v_p
| c_in(v_pa,sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_331,c_274]) ).
cnf(c_339,plain,
v_pa = v_p,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_338,c_324]) ).
cnf(c_342,plain,
c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_pa,t_a) = sP0_iProver_def,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_339]) ).
cnf(c_351,plain,
c_in(sP0_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_342,c_266]) ).
cnf(c_353,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_351,c_102]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : LCL434-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 22 14:23:24 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.97/1.19 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.97/1.19 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19 ------ iProver source info
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19 git: date: 2024-06-12 09:56:46 +0000
% 1.97/1.19 git: sha1: 4869ab62f0a3398f9d3a35e6db7918ebd3847e49
% 1.97/1.19 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19 ------ Parsing...successful
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.97/1.19 ------ Proving...
% 1.97/1.19 ------ Problem Properties
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19 clauses 10
% 1.97/1.19 conjectures 2
% 1.97/1.19 EPR 2
% 1.97/1.19 Horn 9
% 1.97/1.19 unary 7
% 1.97/1.19 binary 2
% 1.97/1.19 lits 14
% 1.97/1.19 lits eq 5
% 1.97/1.19 fd_pure 0
% 1.97/1.19 fd_pseudo 0
% 1.97/1.19 fd_cond 0
% 1.97/1.19 fd_pseudo_cond 1
% 1.97/1.19 AC symbols 0
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19 ------
% 1.97/1.19 Current options:
% 1.97/1.19 ------
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19 ------ Proving...
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.97/1.19
% 1.97/1.19
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------