TSTP Solution File: LCL434-2 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : LCL434-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:48:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   46 (  22   ~;  22   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   3 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (  26   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f89,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f41,f50,f88]) ).

fof(f88,plain,
    ~ spl4_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f87]) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f86,f10]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ~ c_in(sF0,sF1,sF2),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f2,f9,f8,f7]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a) = sF0,
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a) = sF1,
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a) = sF2,
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f86,plain,
    ( c_in(sF0,sF1,sF2)
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f81,f7]) ).

fof(f81,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,v_pa,t_a),sF1,sF2)
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f31,f53]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ( c_in(v_pa,sF1,sF2)
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f52,f8]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ( c_in(v_pa,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),sF2)
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f36,f18]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(X0,X1,sF2)
      | c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(X1,t_a),sF2) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f3,f9]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(X0,X1,tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
      | c_in(X0,c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OH_0) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ( c_in(v_pa,v_H,sF2)
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ( spl4_1
  <=> c_in(v_pa,v_H,sF2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_1])]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(X0,sF1,sF2)
      | c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,t_a),sF1,sF2) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f30,f9]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,t_a),sF1,sF2)
      | ~ c_in(X0,sF1,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f28,f9]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X1,X0,t_a),sF1,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
      | ~ c_in(X0,sF1,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f5,f8]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ c_in(X3,c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
      | c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X3,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Oweaken__right_0) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ~ spl4_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f49]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f47,f10]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ( c_in(sF0,sF1,sF2)
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f15,f44]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ( sF0 = c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_pa,t_a)
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f7,f40]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ( v_pa = v_p
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ( spl4_2
  <=> v_pa = v_p ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_2])]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X0] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X0,t_a),sF1,sF2),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f13,f9]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X0] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X0,t_a),sF1,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(superposition,[],[f4,f8]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(X0,X0,X2),c_PropLog_Othms(X1,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms__I_0) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f32,f38,f34]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ( v_pa = v_p
    | c_in(v_pa,v_H,sF2) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f26,f12]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    c_in(v_pa,sF3,sF2),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f1,f9,f11,f9]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    c_insert(v_p,v_H,sF2) = sF3,
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    c_in(v_pa,c_insert(v_p,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_in(X0,sF3,sF2)
      | v_p = X0
      | c_in(X0,v_H,sF2) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f6,f11]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ c_in(X4,c_insert(X5,X6,X2),X2)
      | X4 = X5
      | c_in(X4,X6,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OinsertE_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : LCL434-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 02:09:59 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.50  % (15910)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (15926)ott+10_1:1_tgt=ground:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (15910)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.51  % (15909)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (15919)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.19/0.51  % (15910)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.51  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.51  % (15910)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51  % (15910)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.51  % (15910)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.51  % (15910)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.51  
% 0.19/0.51  % (15910)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.19/0.51  % (15910)Time elapsed: 0.109 s
% 0.19/0.51  % (15910)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.19/0.51  % (15910)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51  % (15910)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51  % (15903)Success in time 0.164 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------