TSTP Solution File: LCL434-2 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : LCL434-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:15:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.36s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
c_in(v_pa,c_insert(v_p,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_pa,c_insert(v_p,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| sPE(v_pa,v_p)
| c_in(v_pa,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OinsertE_0)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_pa,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Oweaken__right_0)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_pa,v_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| c_in(v_pa,c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms_OH_0)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
sPE(c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
sPE(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
sPE(v_pa,v_pa),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
sPE(t_a,t_a),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ sPE(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a))
| ~ sPE(c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a))
| ~ sPE(tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
| c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Othms(v_H,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_PropLog_Othms__I_0)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
( ~ sPE(v_pa,v_p)
| ~ sPE(v_pa,v_pa)
| ~ sPE(t_a,t_a)
| sPE(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_pa,v_pa,t_a),c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_p,v_pa,t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL434-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 12:39:39 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.36 % symbols: 11
% 0.19/0.36 % clauses: 14
% 0.19/0.36 % start clauses: 2
% 0.19/0.36 % iterative deepening steps: 118
% 0.19/0.36 % maximum path limit: 3
% 0.19/0.36 % literal attempts: 15429
% 0.19/0.36 % depth failures: 9531
% 0.19/0.36 % regularity failures: 77
% 0.19/0.36 % tautology failures: 540
% 0.19/0.36 % reductions: 3070
% 0.19/0.36 % extensions: 12187
% 0.19/0.36 % SAT variables: 4693
% 0.19/0.36 % SAT clauses: 4832
% 0.19/0.36 % WalkSAT solutions: 4827
% 0.19/0.36 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.19/0.36 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.36 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------