TSTP Solution File: LCL433-2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LCL433-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:48:05 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.47s 1.88s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (   9 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   42 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   41 (  22   ~;  19   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   15 (   6   >;   9   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (;  53   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ c_in > c_PropLog_Osat > c_insert > c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62 > c_PropLog_Othms > #nlpp > tc_PropLog_Opl > v_xa > v_x > v_F > t_a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(v_x,type,
    v_x: $i ).

tff(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62,type,
    c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(v_xa,type,
    v_xa: $i ).

tff(c_PropLog_Osat,type,
    c_PropLog_Osat: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(t_a,type,
    t_a: $i ).

tff(c_PropLog_Othms,type,
    c_PropLog_Othms: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(c_in,type,
    c_in: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(tc_PropLog_Opl,type,
    tc_PropLog_Opl: $i > $i ).

tff(v_F,type,
    v_F: $i ).

tff(c_insert,type,
    c_insert: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_26,axiom,
    c_PropLog_Osat(c_insert(v_x,v_F,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),v_xa,t_a),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_38,axiom,
    ! [V_p,V_H,T_a,V_q] :
      ( ~ c_PropLog_Osat(c_insert(V_p,V_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)),V_q,T_a)
      | c_PropLog_Osat(V_H,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p,V_q,T_a),T_a) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_58,axiom,
    ! [V_x,V_B,T_a] : c_in(V_x,c_insert(V_x,V_B,T_a),T_a),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_33,axiom,
    ! [V_U] :
      ( c_in(V_U,c_PropLog_Othms(v_F,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
      | ~ c_PropLog_Osat(v_F,V_U,t_a) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_43,axiom,
    ! [V_p,V_H,T_a] :
      ( ~ c_in(V_p,V_H,tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a))
      | c_in(V_p,c_PropLog_Othms(V_H,T_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_56,axiom,
    ! [V_p,V_G,T_a,V_a] :
      ( ~ c_in(V_p,c_PropLog_Othms(V_G,T_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a))
      | c_in(V_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(V_a,V_G,tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)),T_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_51,axiom,
    ! [V_p,V_H,T_a,V_q] :
      ( ~ c_in(V_p,c_PropLog_Othms(V_H,T_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a))
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p,V_q,T_a),c_PropLog_Othms(V_H,T_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a))
      | c_in(V_q,c_PropLog_Othms(V_H,T_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_28,axiom,
    ~ c_in(v_xa,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(v_x,v_F,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    c_PropLog_Osat(c_insert(v_x,v_F,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),v_xa,t_a),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    ! [V_H_27,V_p_28,V_q_29,T_a_30] :
      ( c_PropLog_Osat(V_H_27,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p_28,V_q_29,T_a_30),T_a_30)
      | ~ c_PropLog_Osat(c_insert(V_p_28,V_H_27,tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_30)),V_q_29,T_a_30) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_38]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    c_PropLog_Osat(v_F,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_x,v_xa,t_a),t_a),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_24]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [V_x_17,V_B_18,T_a_19] : c_in(V_x_17,c_insert(V_x_17,V_B_18,T_a_19),T_a_19),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_58]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [V_U_1] :
      ( ~ c_PropLog_Osat(v_F,V_U_1,t_a)
      | c_in(V_U_1,c_PropLog_Othms(v_F,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [V_p_6,V_H_7,T_a_8] :
      ( c_in(V_p_6,c_PropLog_Othms(V_H_7,T_a_8),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_8))
      | ~ c_in(V_p_6,V_H_7,tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_8)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_43]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [V_p_13,V_a_16,V_G_14,T_a_15] :
      ( c_in(V_p_13,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(V_a_16,V_G_14,tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_15)),T_a_15),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_15))
      | ~ c_in(V_p_13,c_PropLog_Othms(V_G_14,T_a_15),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_15)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    ! [V_q_35,V_H_36,T_a_37,V_p_38] :
      ( c_in(V_q_35,c_PropLog_Othms(V_H_36,T_a_37),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_37))
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p_38,V_q_35,T_a_37),c_PropLog_Othms(V_H_36,T_a_37),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_37))
      | ~ c_in(V_p_38,c_PropLog_Othms(V_H_36,T_a_37),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_37)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_139,plain,
    ! [T_a_64,V_q_63,V_G_62,V_a_61,V_p_65] :
      ( c_in(V_q_63,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(V_a_61,V_G_62,tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_64)),T_a_64),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_64))
      | ~ c_in(V_p_65,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(V_a_61,V_G_62,tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_64)),T_a_64),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_64))
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p_65,V_q_63,T_a_64),c_PropLog_Othms(V_G_62,T_a_64),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_64)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_34]) ).

tff(c_221,plain,
    ! [V_p_98,V_G_96,T_a_99,V_q_100,V_a_97] :
      ( c_in(V_q_100,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(V_a_97,V_G_96,tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_99)),T_a_99),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_99))
      | ~ c_in(c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p_98,V_q_100,T_a_99),c_PropLog_Othms(V_G_96,T_a_99),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_99))
      | ~ c_in(V_p_98,c_insert(V_a_97,V_G_96,tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_99)),tc_PropLog_Opl(T_a_99)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_139]) ).

tff(c_259,plain,
    ! [V_q_106,V_a_107,V_p_108] :
      ( c_in(V_q_106,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(V_a_107,v_F,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
      | ~ c_in(V_p_108,c_insert(V_a_107,v_F,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
      | ~ c_PropLog_Osat(v_F,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_p_108,V_q_106,t_a),t_a) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_221]) ).

tff(c_264,plain,
    ! [V_q_109,V_x_110] :
      ( c_in(V_q_109,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(V_x_110,v_F,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a))
      | ~ c_PropLog_Osat(v_F,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(V_x_110,V_q_109,t_a),t_a) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_259]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ~ c_in(v_xa,c_PropLog_Othms(c_insert(v_x,v_F,tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).

tff(c_292,plain,
    ~ c_PropLog_Osat(v_F,c_PropLog_Opl_Oop_A_N_62(v_x,v_xa,t_a),t_a),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_264,c_4]) ).

tff(c_304,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_28,c_292]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : LCL433-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:34:29 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.47/1.88  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.47/1.89  
% 3.47/1.89  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.47/1.91  
% 3.47/1.92  Inference rules
% 3.47/1.92  ----------------------
% 3.47/1.92  #Ref     : 0
% 3.47/1.92  #Sup     : 63
% 3.47/1.92  #Fact    : 0
% 3.47/1.92  #Define  : 0
% 3.47/1.92  #Split   : 1
% 3.47/1.92  #Chain   : 0
% 3.47/1.92  #Close   : 0
% 3.47/1.92  
% 3.47/1.92  Ordering : KBO
% 3.47/1.92  
% 3.47/1.92  Simplification rules
% 3.47/1.92  ----------------------
% 3.47/1.92  #Subsume      : 6
% 3.47/1.92  #Demod        : 1
% 3.47/1.92  #Tautology    : 0
% 3.47/1.92  #SimpNegUnit  : 2
% 3.47/1.92  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.47/1.92  
% 3.47/1.92  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.47/1.92  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.47/1.92  
% 3.47/1.92  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.47/1.92  ----------------------
% 3.47/1.92  Preprocessing        : 0.44
% 3.47/1.92  Parsing              : 0.24
% 3.47/1.92  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.47/1.92  Main loop            : 0.41
% 3.47/1.92  Inferencing          : 0.17
% 3.47/1.92  Reduction            : 0.10
% 3.47/1.92  Demodulation         : 0.07
% 3.47/1.92  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.47/1.92  Subsumption          : 0.11
% 3.47/1.92  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.47/1.92  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.47/1.92  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.47/1.92  Total                : 0.90
% 3.47/1.92  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.47/1.92  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.47/1.92  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.47/1.92  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------