TSTP Solution File: LCL431-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : LCL431-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:24:51 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.52s 0.82s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 2 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_PropLog_Ocompleteness__0__lemma__dest_0,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(X1,X3,X2),c_PropLog_Ohyps(X1,X4,X2),tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))),X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
| ~ c_PropLog_Osat(c_emptyset,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.osSosSXr4b/E---3.1_19362.p',cls_PropLog_Ocompleteness__0__lemma__dest_0) ).
cnf(cls_Set_ODiff__cancel_0,axiom,
c_minus(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)) = c_emptyset,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.osSosSXr4b/E---3.1_19362.p',cls_Set_ODiff__cancel_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_emptyset,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.osSosSXr4b/E---3.1_19362.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_PropLog_Osat(c_emptyset,v_p,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.osSosSXr4b/E---3.1_19362.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_minus(c_PropLog_Ohyps(X1,X3,X2),c_PropLog_Ohyps(X1,X4,X2),tc_set(tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))),X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
| ~ c_PropLog_Osat(c_emptyset,X1,X2) ),
cls_PropLog_Ocompleteness__0__lemma__dest_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
c_minus(X1,X1,tc_set(X2)) = c_emptyset,
cls_Set_ODiff__cancel_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_p,c_PropLog_Othms(c_emptyset,t_a),tc_PropLog_Opl(t_a)),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_in(X1,c_PropLog_Othms(c_emptyset,X2),tc_PropLog_Opl(X2))
| ~ c_PropLog_Osat(c_emptyset,X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
c_PropLog_Osat(c_emptyset,v_p,t_a),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : LCL431-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 12:59:10 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.67 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.67 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.osSosSXr4b/E---3.1_19362.p
% 0.52/0.82 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.52/0.82 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.52/0.82 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.52/0.82 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.52/0.82 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.52/0.82 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.52/0.82 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.52/0.82 # new_bool_3 with pid 19440 completed with status 0
% 0.52/0.82 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.52/0.82 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.52/0.82 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.52/0.82 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.52/0.82 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.52/0.82 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.52/0.82 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.52/0.82 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.52/0.82 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.52/0.82 # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 19443 completed with status 0
% 0.52/0.82 # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.52/0.82 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.52/0.82 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.52/0.82 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.52/0.82 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.52/0.82 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.52/0.82 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.52/0.82 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.52/0.82 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.52/0.82 # Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 0.52/0.82
% 0.52/0.82 # Proof found!
% 0.52/0.82 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.52/0.82 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.52/0.82 # Parsed axioms : 2753
% 0.52/0.82 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2360
% 0.52/0.82 # Initial clauses : 393
% 0.52/0.82 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.52/0.82 # Initial clauses in saturation : 393
% 0.52/0.82 # Processed clauses : 442
% 0.52/0.82 # ...of these trivial : 8
% 0.52/0.82 # ...subsumed : 65
% 0.52/0.82 # ...remaining for further processing : 369
% 0.52/0.82 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.52/0.82 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.52/0.82 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.52/0.82 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.52/0.82 # Generated clauses : 1991
% 0.52/0.82 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1510
% 0.52/0.82 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.52/0.82 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.52/0.82 # Paramodulations : 1967
% 0.52/0.82 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.52/0.82 # NegExts : 0
% 0.52/0.82 # Equation resolutions : 24
% 0.52/0.82 # Total rewrite steps : 673
% 0.52/0.82 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.52/0.82 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.52/0.82 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.52/0.82 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.52/0.82 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.52/0.82 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.52/0.82 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.52/0.82 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.52/0.82 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.52/0.82 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.52/0.82 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.52/0.82 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.52/0.82 # Current number of processed clauses : 361
% 0.52/0.82 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 66
% 0.52/0.82 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.52/0.82 # Negative unit clauses : 19
% 0.52/0.82 # Non-unit-clauses : 274
% 0.52/0.82 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1459
% 0.52/0.82 # ...number of literals in the above : 4248
% 0.52/0.82 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.52/0.82 # Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.52/0.82 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 15297
% 0.52/0.82 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6724
% 0.52/0.82 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 26
% 0.52/0.82 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 465
% 0.52/0.82 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.52/0.82 # BW rewrite match attempts : 26
% 0.52/0.82 # BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.52/0.82 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.52/0.82 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.52/0.82 # Termbank termtop insertions : 56415
% 0.52/0.82
% 0.52/0.82 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.82 # User time : 0.084 s
% 0.52/0.82 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.52/0.82 # Total time : 0.096 s
% 0.52/0.82 # Maximum resident set size: 4332 pages
% 0.52/0.82
% 0.52/0.82 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.82 # User time : 0.116 s
% 0.52/0.82 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.52/0.82 # Total time : 0.129 s
% 0.52/0.82 # Maximum resident set size: 3480 pages
% 0.52/0.82 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------