TSTP Solution File: LCL429-2 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : LCL429-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 01:33:14 EST 2010
% Result : GaveUp 0.42s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP659/LCL/LCL429-2+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ........ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 7] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 11] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 15] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 19] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 23] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 27] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 31] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 35] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 39] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 47] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 51] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 55] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 59] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 63] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 67] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 71] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 75] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 79] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 83] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 87] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 91] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 95] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 99] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 103] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 107] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 111] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 115] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 116] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 118] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 126] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 138] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 168] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 198] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 228] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 258] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 288] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 318] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 348] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 378] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 408] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 438] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 468] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 498] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 528] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 558] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 588] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 618] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 648] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 678] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 708] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 738] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 768] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 798] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 828] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 858] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 888] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 918] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 5]
% GIVE UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 918
% resolvents: 918 factors: 0
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 5
% Total = 5
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 118 [3] = 220 [4] = 580
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c_in_3 (+)1 (-)1
% [1] c_lessequals_3 (+)3 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)4 (-)1
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 5
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 35
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 918
% Number of unification failures: 3824
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 1
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 4424
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 60
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 11
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 38
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 5
% Number of states in UCFA table: 118
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 118
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.00
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 51
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 4742
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: inf
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 1 secs
% CPU time: 0.41 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------