TSTP Solution File: LCL415-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : LCL415-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 01:23:30 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.06s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP1411/LCL/LCL415-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 25] [nf = 0] [nu = 9] [ut = 7]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 57] [nf = 4] [nu = 20] [ut = 7]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1155] [nf = 8] [nu = 882] [ut = 39]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3565] [nf = 408] [nu = 2492] [ut = 39]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 49690] [nf = 901] [nu = 37822] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 112080] [nf = 9565] [nu = 74246] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 695166] [nf = 18756] [nu = 449528] [ut = 59]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 14 secs [nr = 1491265] [nf = 91937] [nu = 829389] [ut = 59]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 80 secs [nr = 6852413] [nf = 169021] [nu = 3702426] [ut = 63]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 10917087] [nf = 361198] [nu = 5354663] [ut = 63]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 10917236] [nf = 361198] [nu = 5354741] [ut = 63]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 10917397] [nf = 361208] [nu = 5354819] [ut = 63]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 10954245] [nf = 361218] [nu = 5384737] [ut = 63]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 11002253] [nf = 370739] [nu = 5414655] [ut = 63]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 141 secs [nr = 12925433] [nf = 380500] [nu = 6775865] [ut = 65]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 160 secs [nr = 15572537] [nf = 868206] [nu = 8138530] [ut = 65]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 28846904
% resolvents: 27902229 factors: 944675
% Number of unit clauses generated: 15655288
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 54.27
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2 [2] = 5 [4] = 32 [6] = 16 [8] = 12 [10] = 4
% Total = 71
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 15655288 [2] = 10002688 [3] = 3057086 [4] = 131842
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] is_a_theorem_1 (+)5 (-)66
% ------------------
% Total: (+)5 (-)66
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 71
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 9890670
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 28846904
% Number of unification failures: 112060942
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 330
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 9768907
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 0
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 40
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 11524533
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 1452699
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 63
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 11
% Number of states in UCFA table: 1690
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 3665
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.46
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 38
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 140907846
% ConstructUnitClause() = 11524602
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 50.85 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 96156
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------