TSTP Solution File: LCL414+1 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : LCL414+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 12:52:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  24 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   84 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   77 (  34   ~;  27   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  113 (  10 sgn  56   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thm147,conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [P,Q] :
          ( ~ a_truth(implies(P,Q))
          | ~ a_truth(P)
          | a_truth(Q) )
      & ! [P,Q] : a_truth(implies(P,implies(Q,P)))
      & ! [P,Q,R] : a_truth(implies(implies(P,implies(Q,R)),implies(implies(P,Q),implies(P,R))))
      & ! [P,Q] : a_truth(implies(implies(not(P),not(Q)),implies(Q,P)))
      & ? [A] : ~ a_truth(implies(A,A)) ) ).

fof(subgoal_0,plain,
    ( ( ! [P,Q] :
          ( ~ a_truth(implies(P,Q))
          | ~ a_truth(P)
          | a_truth(Q) )
      & ! [P,Q] : a_truth(implies(P,implies(Q,P)))
      & ! [P,Q,R] : a_truth(implies(implies(P,implies(Q,R)),implies(implies(P,Q),implies(P,R))))
      & ! [P,Q] : a_truth(implies(implies(not(P),not(Q)),implies(Q,P))) )
   => ! [A] : a_truth(implies(A,A)) ),
    inference(strip,[],[thm147]) ).

fof(negate_0_0,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [P,Q] :
            ( ~ a_truth(implies(P,Q))
            | ~ a_truth(P)
            | a_truth(Q) )
        & ! [P,Q] : a_truth(implies(P,implies(Q,P)))
        & ! [P,Q,R] : a_truth(implies(implies(P,implies(Q,R)),implies(implies(P,Q),implies(P,R))))
        & ! [P,Q] : a_truth(implies(implies(not(P),not(Q)),implies(Q,P))) )
     => ! [A] : a_truth(implies(A,A)) ),
    inference(negate,[],[subgoal_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_0,plain,
    ( ? [A] : ~ a_truth(implies(A,A))
    & ! [P,Q] : a_truth(implies(P,implies(Q,P)))
    & ! [P,Q] : a_truth(implies(implies(not(P),not(Q)),implies(Q,P)))
    & ! [P,Q] :
        ( ~ a_truth(P)
        | ~ a_truth(implies(P,Q))
        | a_truth(Q) )
    & ! [P,Q,R] : a_truth(implies(implies(P,implies(Q,R)),implies(implies(P,Q),implies(P,R)))) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[negate_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_1,plain,
    ? [A] : ~ a_truth(implies(A,A)),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_2,plain,
    ~ a_truth(implies(skolemFOFtoCNF_A,skolemFOFtoCNF_A)),
    inference(skolemize,[],[normalize_0_1]) ).

fof(normalize_0_3,plain,
    ! [P,Q] : a_truth(implies(P,implies(Q,P))),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_4,plain,
    ! [P,Q] : a_truth(implies(P,implies(Q,P))),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_3]) ).

fof(normalize_0_5,plain,
    ! [P,Q] :
      ( ~ a_truth(P)
      | ~ a_truth(implies(P,Q))
      | a_truth(Q) ),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_6,plain,
    ! [P,Q] :
      ( ~ a_truth(P)
      | ~ a_truth(implies(P,Q))
      | a_truth(Q) ),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_5]) ).

fof(normalize_0_7,plain,
    ! [P,Q] : a_truth(implies(implies(not(P),not(Q)),implies(Q,P))),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_8,plain,
    ! [P,Q] : a_truth(implies(implies(not(P),not(Q)),implies(Q,P))),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_7]) ).

fof(normalize_0_9,plain,
    ! [P,Q,R] : a_truth(implies(implies(P,implies(Q,R)),implies(implies(P,Q),implies(P,R)))),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_10,plain,
    ! [P,Q,R] : a_truth(implies(implies(P,implies(Q,R)),implies(implies(P,Q),implies(P,R)))),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_9]) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    ~ a_truth(implies(skolemFOFtoCNF_A,skolemFOFtoCNF_A)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_2]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    a_truth(implies(P,implies(Q,P))),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    a_truth(implies(X_7,implies(Q,X_7))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_1:[bind(P,$fot(X_7))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(P)
    | ~ a_truth(implies(P,Q))
    | a_truth(Q) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_6]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(X_7)
    | ~ a_truth(implies(X_7,implies(Q,X_7)))
    | a_truth(implies(Q,X_7)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_3:[bind(P,$fot(X_7)),bind(Q,$fot(implies(Q,X_7)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(X_7)
    | a_truth(implies(Q,X_7)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( a_truth(implies(X_7,implies(Q,X_7))) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(implies(implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_55),implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_56)))
    | a_truth(implies(Q,implies(implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_55),implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_56)))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_5:[bind(X_7,$fot(implies(implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_55),implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_56))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    a_truth(implies(implies(not(P),not(Q)),implies(Q,P))),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_8]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    a_truth(implies(implies(not(X_54),not(X_53)),implies(X_53,X_54))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_7:[bind(P,$fot(X_54)),bind(Q,$fot(X_53))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    a_truth(implies(implies(P,implies(Q,R)),implies(implies(P,Q),implies(P,R)))),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_10]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(implies(P,implies(Q,R)))
    | ~ a_truth(implies(implies(P,implies(Q,R)),implies(implies(P,Q),implies(P,R))))
    | a_truth(implies(implies(P,Q),implies(P,R))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_3:[bind(P,$fot(implies(P,implies(Q,R)))),bind(Q,$fot(implies(implies(P,Q),implies(P,R))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(implies(P,implies(Q,R)))
    | a_truth(implies(implies(P,Q),implies(P,R))) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( a_truth(implies(implies(P,implies(Q,R)),implies(implies(P,Q),implies(P,R)))) )],[refute_0_9,refute_0_10]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(implies(implies(not(X_54),not(X_53)),implies(X_53,X_54)))
    | a_truth(implies(implies(implies(not(X_54),not(X_53)),X_53),implies(implies(not(X_54),not(X_53)),X_54))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_11:[bind(P,$fot(implies(not(X_54),not(X_53)))),bind(Q,$fot(X_53)),bind(R,$fot(X_54))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    a_truth(implies(implies(implies(not(X_54),not(X_53)),X_53),implies(implies(not(X_54),not(X_53)),X_54))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( a_truth(implies(implies(not(X_54),not(X_53)),implies(X_53,X_54))) )],[refute_0_8,refute_0_12]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    a_truth(implies(implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_55),implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_56))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_13:[bind(X_53,$fot(X_55)),bind(X_54,$fot(X_56))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    a_truth(implies(Q,implies(implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_55),implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_56)))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( a_truth(implies(implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_55),implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_56))) )],[refute_0_14,refute_0_6]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    a_truth(implies(X_74,implies(implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_55),implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_56)))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_15:[bind(Q,$fot(X_74))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(implies(X_58,X_57))
    | ~ a_truth(implies(implies(X_58,X_57),implies(X_58,X_58)))
    | a_truth(implies(X_58,X_58)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_3:[bind(P,$fot(implies(X_58,X_57))),bind(Q,$fot(implies(X_58,X_58)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
    a_truth(implies(X_54,implies(X_53,X_54))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_1:[bind(P,$fot(X_54)),bind(Q,$fot(X_53))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(implies(X_54,implies(X_53,X_54)))
    | a_truth(implies(implies(X_54,X_53),implies(X_54,X_54))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_11:[bind(P,$fot(X_54)),bind(Q,$fot(X_53)),bind(R,$fot(X_54))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
    a_truth(implies(implies(X_54,X_53),implies(X_54,X_54))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( a_truth(implies(X_54,implies(X_53,X_54))) )],[refute_0_18,refute_0_19]) ).

cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
    a_truth(implies(implies(X_58,X_57),implies(X_58,X_58))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_20:[bind(X_53,$fot(X_57)),bind(X_54,$fot(X_58))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(implies(X_58,X_57))
    | a_truth(implies(X_58,X_58)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( a_truth(implies(implies(X_58,X_57),implies(X_58,X_58))) )],[refute_0_21,refute_0_17]) ).

cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ a_truth(implies(X_74,implies(implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_55),implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_56))))
    | a_truth(implies(X_74,X_74)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_22:[bind(X_57,$fot(implies(implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_55),implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_56)))),bind(X_58,$fot(X_74))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_24,plain,
    a_truth(implies(X_74,X_74)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( a_truth(implies(X_74,implies(implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_55),implies(implies(not(X_56),not(X_55)),X_56)))) )],[refute_0_16,refute_0_23]) ).

cnf(refute_0_25,plain,
    a_truth(implies(skolemFOFtoCNF_A,skolemFOFtoCNF_A)),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_24:[bind(X_74,$fot(skolemFOFtoCNF_A))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( a_truth(implies(skolemFOFtoCNF_A,skolemFOFtoCNF_A)) )],[refute_0_25,refute_0_0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : LCL414+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 03:57:19 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.36  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------