TSTP Solution File: LCL398-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LCL398-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZDUZzReXSu true

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:59:31 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.72s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : LCL398-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.14/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ZDUZzReXSu true
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 18:59:31 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.69  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.72  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.21/0.72  % BCE start: 5
% 0.21/0.72  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.21/0.72  % PE start: 5
% 0.21/0.72  logic: neq
% 0.21/0.72  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.21/0.72  % done 13 iterations in 0.011s
% 0.21/0.72  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.21/0.72  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.72  thf(y_type, type, y: $i).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(not_type, type, not: $i > $i).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(x_type, type, x: $i).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(cn_3, axiom,
% 0.21/0.72    (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ ( not @ X ) @ Y ) ))).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.21/0.72      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.72          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X1)))),
% 0.21/0.72      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_3])).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 0.21/0.72    (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) | ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) | 
% 0.21/0.72     ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.21/0.72      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.72         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.21/0.72          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.21/0.72          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.21/0.72      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 0.21/0.72      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.72         (~ (is_a_theorem @ X1) |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 0.21/0.72      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(prove_cn_64, conjecture,
% 0.21/0.72    (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( not @ ( implies @ x @ x ) ) @ y ))).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.72    (~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( not @ ( implies @ x @ x ) ) @ y ) )),
% 0.21/0.72    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_cn_64])).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.21/0.72      (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (not @ (implies @ x @ x)) @ y))),
% 0.21/0.72      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain, (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ x @ x))),
% 0.21/0.72      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(cn_2, axiom,
% 0.21/0.72    (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( not @ X ) @ X ) @ X ))).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.21/0.72      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.72          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0) @ X0))),
% 0.21/0.72      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_2])).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.21/0.72      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.72          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X1)))),
% 0.21/0.72      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_3])).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(cn_1, axiom,
% 0.21/0.72    (is_a_theorem @
% 0.21/0.72     ( implies @
% 0.21/0.72       ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ 
% 0.21/0.72       ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ Z ) @ ( implies @ X @ Z ) ) ))).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.21/0.72      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.72          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.21/0.72           (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ 
% 0.21/0.72            (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 0.21/0.72      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_1])).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.21/0.72      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.72         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.21/0.72          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.21/0.72          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.21/0.72      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.21/0.72      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.72         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.21/0.72          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 0.21/0.72              (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.21/0.72      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.21/0.72      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.72         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.21/0.72          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 0.21/0.72          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 0.21/0.72      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 0.21/0.72      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.72         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.21/0.72          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 0.21/0.72          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.21/0.72      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 0.21/0.72      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.72         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X0) @ X2))
% 0.21/0.72          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.21/0.72      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain,
% 0.21/0.72      (![X0 : $i]:  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X0))),
% 0.21/0.72      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl12])).
% 0.21/0.72  thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain, ($false),
% 0.21/0.72      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl22])).
% 0.21/0.72  
% 0.21/0.72  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.72  
% 0.21/0.72  
% 0.21/0.72  % Terminating...
% 0.21/0.76  % Runner terminated.
% 1.37/0.77  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------